auth path whitelisting - #5765
Conversation
…iew maintenance (#5693) * feat: support matview_refresh_interval "off" to disable logstore matview maintenance The materialized views back only the dashboard UI. Deployments that run Bifrost headless behind their own observability stack pay the REFRESH MATERIALIZED VIEW CONCURRENTLY cost for views nothing reads, and the 5s floor means the interval alone cannot turn maintenance off. With "off" (or a non-positive duration) the logs store skips view creation, the initial refresh, and the periodic refresher entirely. matViewsReady stays false, so dashboard queries fall back to the raw tables, and the runtime self-heal path cannot re-arm maintenance since it only triggers from matview-path queries. * fix: guard matview self-heal when maintenance is disabled Review follow-up: carry the resolved disabled state onto the store so triggerMatViewSelfHeal cannot recreate views the configuration says must not exist, and make the schema/docs explicit that a zero duration also disables (positive sub-5s values still clamp up).
<!-- This is an auto-generated comment: release notes by coderabbit.ai --> ## Summary by CodeRabbit * **Bug Fixes** * Improved token parameter compatibility handling to preserve alternative formats when the primary option is unsupported. * **Chores** * Version updated to 2.0.0. * Enhanced load testing configuration for more reliable builds. <!-- end of auto-generated comment: release notes by coderabbit.ai -->
## Summary Briefly explain the purpose of this PR and the problem it solves. ## Changes - What was changed and why - Any notable design decisions or trade-offs ## Type of change - [ ] Bug fix - [ ] Feature - [ ] Refactor - [ ] Documentation - [ ] Chore/CI ## Affected areas - [ ] Core (Go) - [ ] Transports (HTTP) - [ ] Providers/Integrations - [ ] Plugins - [ ] UI (React) - [ ] Docs ## How to test Describe the steps to validate this change. Include commands and expected outcomes. ```sh # Core/Transports go version go test ./... # UI cd ui pnpm i || npm i pnpm test || npm test pnpm build || npm run build ``` If adding new configs or environment variables, document them here. ## Screenshots/Recordings If UI changes, add before/after screenshots or short clips. ## Breaking changes - [ ] Yes - [ ] No If yes, describe impact and migration instructions. ## Related issues Link related issues and discussions. Example: Closes #123 ## Security considerations Note any security implications (auth, secrets, PII, sandboxing, etc.). ## Checklist - [ ] I read `docs/contributing/README.md` and followed the guidelines - [ ] I added/updated tests where appropriate - [ ] I updated documentation where needed - [ ] I verified builds succeed (Go and UI) - [ ] I verified the CI pipeline passes locally if applicable
## Summary Adds a `THIRD_PARTY_NOTICES.md` file to formally document third-party components used in Bifrost that carry license terms requiring explicit attribution — specifically MPL-2.0 licensed dependencies and embedded source code derived from external projects. ## Changes - Introduces `THIRD_PARTY_NOTICES.md` to attribute: - Embedded source code in `framework/migrator/migrator.go` derived from `go-gormigrate/gormigrate` (MIT) - Go binary dependencies carrying MPL-2.0 terms: `github.com/cyphar/filepath-securejoin` and `github.com/hashicorp/go-version` - npm build-time devDependencies carrying MPL-2.0 terms: `lightningcss` (never shipped to end users) and `dompurify` (Apache-2.0 option elected) - All MPL-2.0 components are used unmodified and combined as a "Larger Work" per MPL-2.0 Section 3.3; no Bifrost source files are themselves MPL-licensed. ## Type of change - [ ] Bug fix - [ ] Feature - [ ] Refactor - [x] Documentation - [ ] Chore/CI ## Affected areas - [ ] Core (Go) - [ ] Transports (HTTP) - [ ] Providers/Integrations - [ ] Plugins - [ ] UI (React) - [x] Docs ## How to test No functional changes — review the file contents to confirm accuracy of license attributions against the listed upstream repositories. ## Breaking changes - [ ] Yes - [x] No ## Related issues N/A ## Security considerations This change has no security implications. It is a legal/compliance attribution document only. ## Checklist - [ ] I read `docs/contributing/README.md` and followed the guidelines - [ ] I added/updated tests where appropriate - [x] I updated documentation where needed - [x] I verified builds succeed (Go and UI) - [ ] I verified the CI pipeline passes locally if applicable
## Summary Briefly explain the purpose of this PR and the problem it solves. ## Changes - What was changed and why - Any notable design decisions or trade-offs ## Type of change - [ ] Bug fix - [ ] Feature - [ ] Refactor - [ ] Documentation - [ ] Chore/CI ## Affected areas - [ ] Core (Go) - [ ] Transports (HTTP) - [ ] Providers/Integrations - [ ] Plugins - [ ] UI (React) - [ ] Docs ## How to test Describe the steps to validate this change. Include commands and expected outcomes. ```sh # Core/Transports go version go test ./... # UI cd ui pnpm i || npm i pnpm test || npm test pnpm build || npm run build ``` If adding new configs or environment variables, document them here. ## Screenshots/Recordings If UI changes, add before/after screenshots or short clips. ## Breaking changes - [ ] Yes - [ ] No If yes, describe impact and migration instructions. ## Related issues Link related issues and discussions. Example: Closes #123 ## Security considerations Note any security implications (auth, secrets, PII, sandboxing, etc.). ## Checklist - [ ] I read `docs/contributing/README.md` and followed the guidelines - [ ] I added/updated tests where appropriate - [ ] I updated documentation where needed - [ ] I verified builds succeed (Go and UI) - [ ] I verified the CI pipeline passes locally if applicable
## Summary Briefly explain the purpose of this PR and the problem it solves. ## Changes - What was changed and why - Any notable design decisions or trade-offs ## Type of change - [ ] Bug fix - [ ] Feature - [ ] Refactor - [ ] Documentation - [ ] Chore/CI ## Affected areas - [ ] Core (Go) - [ ] Transports (HTTP) - [ ] Providers/Integrations - [ ] Plugins - [ ] UI (React) - [ ] Docs ## How to test Describe the steps to validate this change. Include commands and expected outcomes. ```sh # Core/Transports go version go test ./... # UI cd ui pnpm i || npm i pnpm test || npm test pnpm build || npm run build ``` If adding new configs or environment variables, document them here. ## Screenshots/Recordings If UI changes, add before/after screenshots or short clips. ## Breaking changes - [ ] Yes - [ ] No If yes, describe impact and migration instructions. ## Related issues Link related issues and discussions. Example: Closes #123 ## Security considerations Note any security implications (auth, secrets, PII, sandboxing, etc.). ## Checklist - [ ] I read `docs/contributing/README.md` and followed the guidelines - [ ] I added/updated tests where appropriate - [ ] I updated documentation where needed - [ ] I verified builds succeed (Go and UI) - [ ] I verified the CI pipeline passes locally if applicable
## Summary Briefly explain the purpose of this PR and the problem it solves. ## Changes - What was changed and why - Any notable design decisions or trade-offs ## Type of change - [ ] Bug fix - [ ] Feature - [ ] Refactor - [ ] Documentation - [ ] Chore/CI ## Affected areas - [ ] Core (Go) - [ ] Transports (HTTP) - [ ] Providers/Integrations - [ ] Plugins - [ ] UI (React) - [ ] Docs ## How to test Describe the steps to validate this change. Include commands and expected outcomes. ```sh # Core/Transports go version go test ./... # UI cd ui pnpm i || npm i pnpm test || npm test pnpm build || npm run build ``` If adding new configs or environment variables, document them here. ## Screenshots/Recordings If UI changes, add before/after screenshots or short clips. ## Breaking changes - [ ] Yes - [ ] No If yes, describe impact and migration instructions. ## Related issues Link related issues and discussions. Example: Closes #123 ## Security considerations Note any security implications (auth, secrets, PII, sandboxing, etc.). ## Checklist - [ ] I read `docs/contributing/README.md` and followed the guidelines - [ ] I added/updated tests where appropriate - [ ] I updated documentation where needed - [ ] I verified builds succeed (Go and UI) - [ ] I verified the CI pipeline passes locally if applicable
## Summary Bumps several Go dependencies to their latest patch/minor versions across all modules in the repository. ## Changes - `github.com/aws/aws-sdk-go-v2/service/s3`: `v1.97.3` → `v1.99.0` - `github.com/aws/aws-sdk-go-v2/config`: `v1.32.11` → `v1.32.14` - `github.com/aws/aws-sdk-go-v2/internal/ini`: `v1.8.5` → `v1.8.6` - `github.com/weaviate/weaviate`: `v1.36.5` → `v1.38.0` - `github.com/buger/jsonparser`: `v1.1.2` → `v1.2.0` - `github.com/go-openapi/spec`: `v0.22.2` → `v0.22.3` - `github.com/google/cel-go`: `v0.28.1` → `v0.29.0` - `github.com/stretchr/objx`: `v0.5.3` added as an indirect dependency ## Type of change - [ ] Bug fix - [ ] Feature - [ ] Refactor - [ ] Documentation - [x] Chore/CI ## Affected areas - [x] Core (Go) - [x] Transports (HTTP) - [ ] Providers/Integrations - [x] Plugins - [ ] UI (React) - [ ] Docs ## How to test ```sh go test ./... ``` ## Breaking changes - [ ] Yes - [x] No ## Related issues ## Security considerations None. All changes are dependency version bumps with no security-sensitive modifications. ## Checklist - [ ] I read `docs/contributing/README.md` and followed the guidelines - [ ] I added/updated tests where appropriate - [ ] I updated documentation where needed - [ ] I verified builds succeed (Go and UI) - [ ] I verified the CI pipeline passes locally if applicable
|
No actionable comments were generated in the recent review. 🎉 ℹ️ Recent review info⚙️ Run configurationConfiguration used: Path: .coderabbit.yaml Review profile: CHILL Plan: Pro Plus Run ID: 📒 Files selected for processing (2)
🚧 Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (2)
📝 WalkthroughSummary by CodeRabbit
WalkthroughThe authentication middleware now matches whitelist entries against ChangesAuthentication path matching
Estimated code review effort: 2 (Simple) | ~10 minutes Possibly related PRs
Suggested reviewers: 🚥 Pre-merge checks | ✅ 5✅ Passed checks (5 passed)
✨ Finishing Touches📝 Generate docstrings
🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)
Warning There were issues while running some tools. Please review the errors and either fix the tool's configuration or disable the tool if it's a critical failure. 🔧 golangci-lint (2.12.2)level=error msg="[linters_context] typechecking error: pattern ./...: directory prefix . does not contain main module or its selected dependencies" Comment |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 1
🤖 Prompt for all review comments with AI agents
Verify each finding against current code. Fix only still-valid issues, skip the
rest with a brief reason, keep changes minimal, and validate.
Inline comments:
In `@transports/bifrost-http/handlers/middlewares_test.go`:
- Around line 765-766: Update the traversal-path test case in the middleware
test table to use double percent encoding for each dot and slash component, such
as the proposed %25-prefixed form, so it exercises two decoding passes while
preserving the expected rejection behavior.
🪄 Autofix (Beta)
Fix all unresolved CodeRabbit comments on this PR:
- Push a commit to this branch (recommended)
- Create a new PR with the fixes
ℹ️ Review info
⚙️ Run configuration
Configuration used: Path: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro Plus
Run ID: 392560bf-8ebd-46e0-92e2-44a764328afb
📒 Files selected for processing (2)
transports/bifrost-http/handlers/middlewares.gotransports/bifrost-http/handlers/middlewares_test.go
1ca7677 to
37e58b8
Compare
The merge-base changed after approval.
244a01d to
ce1b2a6
Compare

Summary
Fixes an authentication bypass vulnerability where percent-encoded path traversal sequences (e.g.
..%2F) could be used to reach protected API endpoints without authentication. Becausefasthttp/routerdispatches routes using the raw, still-encodedPathOriginal(), a request like/api/providers/..%2Fskills%2Fserve%2Fmaliciousis matched by the router as a single opaque segment against the protected/api/providers/{provider}route. However, the previous whitelist check usedctx.Path(), which decodes and normalizes the path first — making the same request appear to be the whitelisted/api/skills/serve/maliciousprefix, allowing it to sail through unauthenticated.Changes
ctx.Request.URI().PathOriginal()(the raw, percent-encoded path) instead ofctx.Path()(the decoded, dot-segment-collapsed path), keeping the auth decision congruent with how the router dispatches the request.TestAuthMiddleware_EncodedTraversalDoesNotBypassAuth) covering the exact PoC traversal pattern, variations with different whitelisted prefixes, doubly-encoded dot segments, and a sanity check confirming that legitimate unencoded whitelisted routes still bypass auth correctly.Type of change
Affected areas
How to test
The new regression test should pass, confirming that encoded traversal requests return
401 Unauthorizedand that legitimate whitelisted routes continue to bypass auth as expected.Breaking changes
Security considerations
This is a security fix for an authentication bypass. Requests using percent-encoded path traversal sequences to make a protected route appear whitelisted are now correctly blocked. Any client relying on encoded traversal paths to access protected endpoints without credentials will receive
401 Unauthorized. Legitimate clients using properly formed, unencoded paths are unaffected.Checklist
docs/contributing/README.mdand followed the guidelines