fix: hide provider and key action buttons based on RBAC permissions - #3296
Conversation
📝 WalkthroughSummary by CodeRabbit
WalkthroughThree workspace UI files now conditionally render elements based on RBAC permissions. The config layout route determines required access level from the current pathname and gates data fetching accordingly. The provider page hides the create dropdown when access is denied. The provider keys table hides add and row action controls when the user lacks corresponding permissions. ChangesPermission-Based UI Rendering
Estimated code review effort🎯 2 (Simple) | ⏱️ ~12 minutes Poem
🚥 Pre-merge checks | ✅ 4 | ❌ 1❌ Failed checks (1 warning)
✅ Passed checks (4 passed)
✏️ Tip: You can configure your own custom pre-merge checks in the settings. ✨ Finishing Touches📝 Generate docstrings
🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)
Tip 💬 Introducing Slack Agent: The best way for teams to turn conversations into code.Slack Agent is built on CodeRabbit's deep understanding of your code, so your team can collaborate across the entire SDLC without losing context.
Built for teams:
One agent for your entire SDLC. Right inside Slack. Comment |
c442cd8 to
ca274f9
Compare
cdf8e9c to
4b78c15
Compare
ca274f9 to
2d17490
Compare
4b78c15 to
d690f0d
Compare
d690f0d to
9585ac6
Compare
2d17490 to
641ad72
Compare
Confidence Score: 4/5Safe to merge — the changes only affect UI rendering logic and introduce no new data mutations or server-side access paths. The RBAC guard in the config layout correctly routes to different permission checks based on pathname, and the conditional rendering in the providers views is straightforward. The only issues are cosmetic: two No files require special attention; the redundant Important Files Changed
Reviews (1): Last reviewed commit: "fix: RBAc checks for model provider page" | Re-trigger Greptile |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🧹 Nitpick comments (3)
ui/app/workspace/providers/views/modelProviderKeysTableView.tsx (2)
155-155: 💤 Low valueClarify or remove the empty
onClickhandler.The table row has an empty
onClickhandler (onClick={() => { }}). If this is intentional to prevent event bubbling or for future use, consider adding a comment. Otherwise, remove it for clarity.🤖 Prompt for AI Agents
Verify each finding against current code. Fix only still-valid issues, skip the rest with a brief reason, keep changes minimal, and validate. In `@ui/app/workspace/providers/views/modelProviderKeysTableView.tsx` at line 155, The table row contains an empty onClick handler (onClick={() => { }}) which is ambiguous; either remove the handler entirely from the row element to avoid needless no-op code, or replace it with a brief explanatory comment and a named no-op function (e.g., rowClickPlaceholder) if it intentionally prevents event bubbling or is reserved for future behavior; locate the row element in modelProviderKeysTableView's render/JSX (the row with onClick={() => { }}) and apply one of these changes so the intent is explicit.
109-120: ⚡ Quick winRemove redundant
disabledprop.The "Add new key" button now renders only when
hasUpdateProviderAccessistrue, so thedisabled={!hasUpdateProviderAccess}prop on line 111 will always evaluate todisabled={false}and can be removed.♻️ Simplified code
{!isKeyless && hasUpdateProviderAccess ? ( <Button - disabled={!hasUpdateProviderAccess} data-testid="add-key-btn" onClick={() => { handleAddKey(); }} > <PlusIcon className="h-4 w-4" /> Add new {entityLabel} </Button> ) : null}🤖 Prompt for AI Agents
Verify each finding against current code. Fix only still-valid issues, skip the rest with a brief reason, keep changes minimal, and validate. In `@ui/app/workspace/providers/views/modelProviderKeysTableView.tsx` around lines 109 - 120, The Button rendering includes a redundant disabled prop because the conditional already ensures it only renders when hasUpdateProviderAccess is true; remove the disabled={!hasUpdateProviderAccess} prop from the Button component in modelProviderKeysTableView.tsx (the JSX block that references isKeyless, hasUpdateProviderAccess, Button, handleAddKey, and entityLabel) so the Button is rendered without the unnecessary disabled attribute.ui/app/workspace/providers/page.tsx (1)
243-251: ⚡ Quick winRemove redundant
disabledprop.Since
AddProviderDropdownnow renders only whenhasProviderCreateAccessistrue, thedisabled={!hasProviderCreateAccess}prop on line 245 will always evaluate todisabled={false}and can be removed. The same applies to line 143 in the empty state.♻️ Simplified code
{hasProviderCreateAccess ? <div className="pb-4"> <AddProviderDropdown - disabled={!hasProviderCreateAccess} existingInSidebar={existingInSidebarNames} knownProviders={knownProviders} onSelectKnownProvider={handleSelectKnownProvider} onAddCustomProvider={() => setShowCustomProviderSheet(true)} /> </div> : null}And similarly at line 142–149:
<AddProviderDropdown - disabled={!hasProviderCreateAccess} existingInSidebar={existingInSidebarNames} knownProviders={knownProviders} onSelectKnownProvider={handleSelectKnownProvider} onAddCustomProvider={() => setShowCustomProviderSheet(true)} variant="empty" />🤖 Prompt for AI Agents
Verify each finding against current code. Fix only still-valid issues, skip the rest with a brief reason, keep changes minimal, and validate. In `@ui/app/workspace/providers/page.tsx` around lines 243 - 251, The AddProviderDropdown is only rendered when hasProviderCreateAccess is true, so remove the redundant disabled={!hasProviderCreateAccess} prop from the AddProviderDropdown instances (the one in the provider list block and the one in the empty state block); keep all other props (existingInSidebarNames, knownProviders, onSelectKnownProvider, onAddCustomProvider which calls setShowCustomProviderSheet) unchanged.
🤖 Prompt for all review comments with AI agents
Verify each finding against current code. Fix only still-valid issues, skip the
rest with a brief reason, keep changes minimal, and validate.
Nitpick comments:
In `@ui/app/workspace/providers/page.tsx`:
- Around line 243-251: The AddProviderDropdown is only rendered when
hasProviderCreateAccess is true, so remove the redundant
disabled={!hasProviderCreateAccess} prop from the AddProviderDropdown instances
(the one in the provider list block and the one in the empty state block); keep
all other props (existingInSidebarNames, knownProviders, onSelectKnownProvider,
onAddCustomProvider which calls setShowCustomProviderSheet) unchanged.
In `@ui/app/workspace/providers/views/modelProviderKeysTableView.tsx`:
- Line 155: The table row contains an empty onClick handler (onClick={() => {
}}) which is ambiguous; either remove the handler entirely from the row element
to avoid needless no-op code, or replace it with a brief explanatory comment and
a named no-op function (e.g., rowClickPlaceholder) if it intentionally prevents
event bubbling or is reserved for future behavior; locate the row element in
modelProviderKeysTableView's render/JSX (the row with onClick={() => { }}) and
apply one of these changes so the intent is explicit.
- Around line 109-120: The Button rendering includes a redundant disabled prop
because the conditional already ensures it only renders when
hasUpdateProviderAccess is true; remove the disabled={!hasUpdateProviderAccess}
prop from the Button component in modelProviderKeysTableView.tsx (the JSX block
that references isKeyless, hasUpdateProviderAccess, Button, handleAddKey, and
entityLabel) so the Button is rendered without the unnecessary disabled
attribute.
ℹ️ Review info
⚙️ Run configuration
Configuration used: Organization UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
Run ID: 164b6794-ba9f-46ee-bbc2-eada2820d66d
📒 Files selected for processing (3)
ui/app/workspace/config/layout.tsxui/app/workspace/providers/page.tsxui/app/workspace/providers/views/modelProviderKeysTableView.tsx
Merge activity
|
…3296) ## Summary Improves RBAC enforcement across the configuration and providers UI by hiding action controls entirely when the user lacks the required permissions, rather than rendering them in a disabled state. ## Changes - The config layout now checks the current route to determine which RBAC resource to evaluate — `APIKeys` for `/workspace/config/api-keys` routes and `Settings` for all others, so users without API key access are not incorrectly blocked from other config pages. - The "Add Provider" dropdown is now conditionally rendered only when the user has provider create access, instead of always rendering with a disabled state. - The "Add new key" button in the model provider keys table is now hidden entirely when the user lacks update access, rather than being rendered as disabled. - The per-row actions dropdown menu (Edit/Delete) in the model provider keys table is now hidden entirely when the user has neither update nor delete access. ## Type of change - [ ] Bug fix - [x] Feature - [ ] Refactor - [ ] Documentation - [ ] Chore/CI ## Affected areas - [ ] Core (Go) - [ ] Transports (HTTP) - [ ] Providers/Integrations - [ ] Plugins - [x] UI (React) - [ ] Docs ## How to test 1. Log in as a user with restricted RBAC permissions (no `APIKeys` view access, no provider create/update/delete access). 2. Navigate to `/workspace/config/api-keys` — the no-permission view should be shown. 3. Navigate to another config page — it should load normally. 4. Navigate to the Providers page — the "Add Provider" dropdown should not be visible. 5. Open a provider's key table — the "Add new key" button and the per-row actions menu should not be visible. 6. Log in as a user with full access and verify all controls appear and function as expected. ```sh cd ui pnpm i || npm i pnpm build || npm run build ``` ## Screenshots/Recordings If UI changes, add before/after screenshots or short clips. ## Breaking changes - [ ] Yes - [x] No ## Related issues Link related issues and discussions. ## Security considerations These changes tighten UI-level RBAC enforcement by ensuring that action controls are not rendered at all for unauthorized users, reducing the surface area for accidental or misleading interactions. Server-side authorization remains the authoritative enforcement layer. ## Checklist - [ ] I read `docs/contributing/README.md` and followed the guidelines - [ ] I added/updated tests where appropriate - [ ] I updated documentation where needed - [ ] I verified builds succeed (Go and UI) - [ ] I verified the CI pipeline passes locally if applicable
…3296) ## Summary Improves RBAC enforcement across the configuration and providers UI by hiding action controls entirely when the user lacks the required permissions, rather than rendering them in a disabled state. ## Changes - The config layout now checks the current route to determine which RBAC resource to evaluate — `APIKeys` for `/workspace/config/api-keys` routes and `Settings` for all others, so users without API key access are not incorrectly blocked from other config pages. - The "Add Provider" dropdown is now conditionally rendered only when the user has provider create access, instead of always rendering with a disabled state. - The "Add new key" button in the model provider keys table is now hidden entirely when the user lacks update access, rather than being rendered as disabled. - The per-row actions dropdown menu (Edit/Delete) in the model provider keys table is now hidden entirely when the user has neither update nor delete access. ## Type of change - [ ] Bug fix - [x] Feature - [ ] Refactor - [ ] Documentation - [ ] Chore/CI ## Affected areas - [ ] Core (Go) - [ ] Transports (HTTP) - [ ] Providers/Integrations - [ ] Plugins - [x] UI (React) - [ ] Docs ## How to test 1. Log in as a user with restricted RBAC permissions (no `APIKeys` view access, no provider create/update/delete access). 2. Navigate to `/workspace/config/api-keys` — the no-permission view should be shown. 3. Navigate to another config page — it should load normally. 4. Navigate to the Providers page — the "Add Provider" dropdown should not be visible. 5. Open a provider's key table — the "Add new key" button and the per-row actions menu should not be visible. 6. Log in as a user with full access and verify all controls appear and function as expected. ```sh cd ui pnpm i || npm i pnpm build || npm run build ``` ## Screenshots/Recordings If UI changes, add before/after screenshots or short clips. ## Breaking changes - [ ] Yes - [x] No ## Related issues Link related issues and discussions. ## Security considerations These changes tighten UI-level RBAC enforcement by ensuring that action controls are not rendered at all for unauthorized users, reducing the surface area for accidental or misleading interactions. Server-side authorization remains the authoritative enforcement layer. ## Checklist - [ ] I read `docs/contributing/README.md` and followed the guidelines - [ ] I added/updated tests where appropriate - [ ] I updated documentation where needed - [ ] I verified builds succeed (Go and UI) - [ ] I verified the CI pipeline passes locally if applicable
…3296) ## Summary Improves RBAC enforcement across the configuration and providers UI by hiding action controls entirely when the user lacks the required permissions, rather than rendering them in a disabled state. ## Changes - The config layout now checks the current route to determine which RBAC resource to evaluate — `APIKeys` for `/workspace/config/api-keys` routes and `Settings` for all others, so users without API key access are not incorrectly blocked from other config pages. - The "Add Provider" dropdown is now conditionally rendered only when the user has provider create access, instead of always rendering with a disabled state. - The "Add new key" button in the model provider keys table is now hidden entirely when the user lacks update access, rather than being rendered as disabled. - The per-row actions dropdown menu (Edit/Delete) in the model provider keys table is now hidden entirely when the user has neither update nor delete access. ## Type of change - [ ] Bug fix - [x] Feature - [ ] Refactor - [ ] Documentation - [ ] Chore/CI ## Affected areas - [ ] Core (Go) - [ ] Transports (HTTP) - [ ] Providers/Integrations - [ ] Plugins - [x] UI (React) - [ ] Docs ## How to test 1. Log in as a user with restricted RBAC permissions (no `APIKeys` view access, no provider create/update/delete access). 2. Navigate to `/workspace/config/api-keys` — the no-permission view should be shown. 3. Navigate to another config page — it should load normally. 4. Navigate to the Providers page — the "Add Provider" dropdown should not be visible. 5. Open a provider's key table — the "Add new key" button and the per-row actions menu should not be visible. 6. Log in as a user with full access and verify all controls appear and function as expected. ```sh cd ui pnpm i || npm i pnpm build || npm run build ``` ## Screenshots/Recordings If UI changes, add before/after screenshots or short clips. ## Breaking changes - [ ] Yes - [x] No ## Related issues Link related issues and discussions. ## Security considerations These changes tighten UI-level RBAC enforcement by ensuring that action controls are not rendered at all for unauthorized users, reducing the surface area for accidental or misleading interactions. Server-side authorization remains the authoritative enforcement layer. ## Checklist - [ ] I read `docs/contributing/README.md` and followed the guidelines - [ ] I added/updated tests where appropriate - [ ] I updated documentation where needed - [ ] I verified builds succeed (Go and UI) - [ ] I verified the CI pipeline passes locally if applicable
…hropic (#3420) * feat: add granular RBAC checks for API keys, inference, metrics, and filter inaccessible sidebar items (#3295) ## Summary This PR improves RBAC granularity in the sidebar by introducing dedicated resource types for `APIKeys`, `Inference`, and `Metrics`, and fixes sidebar visibility logic so that items and groups are hidden when the user lacks access rather than relying on broader, less specific permissions. ## Changes - Added three new `RbacResource` enum values: `APIKeys`, `Inference`, and `Metrics` to the fallback RBAC context. - The API Keys sidebar item now gates access via the new `hasAPIKeyAccess` (`RbacResource.APIKeys`) check instead of the generic `hasSettingsAccess`. - The MCP Logs sidebar item now correctly gates access via `hasMCPGatewayAccess` instead of the unrelated `hasLogsAccess`. - Introduced an `accessibleItems` memoized computation that filters out sidebar items and entire groups whose sub-items are all inaccessible, ensuring users never see empty navigation sections. Previously, access filtering only happened during search. - Removed unused imports (`PanelLeft`, `PanelRight`, `cn`). ## Type of change - [ ] Bug fix - [x] Feature - [x] Refactor - [ ] Documentation - [ ] Chore/CI ## Affected areas - [ ] Core (Go) - [ ] Transports (HTTP) - [ ] Providers/Integrations - [ ] Plugins - [x] UI (React) - [ ] Docs ## How to test 1. Log in as a user with restricted RBAC permissions that exclude `APIKeys` and/or `Settings`. 2. Verify the API Keys entry under the Config section is hidden for users without `APIKeys` view permission. 3. Verify the MCP Logs entry is hidden for users without `MCPGateway` view permission. 4. Verify that sidebar groups with no accessible sub-items are hidden entirely rather than showing an empty group. 5. Verify that users with full access see no change in sidebar behavior. ```sh cd ui pnpm i || npm i pnpm build || npm run build ``` ## Screenshots/Recordings _Add before/after screenshots showing sidebar items hidden for restricted users._ ## Breaking changes - [ ] Yes - [x] No ## Related issues _Link related issues here._ ## Security considerations Access control checks for API Keys management are now scoped to a dedicated `APIKeys` RBAC resource rather than the broader `Settings` resource, reducing the risk of unintended access to key management for users who have settings visibility but should not manage API keys. ## Checklist - [ ] I read `docs/contributing/README.md` and followed the guidelines - [ ] I added/updated tests where appropriate - [ ] I updated documentation where needed - [ ] I verified builds succeed (Go and UI) - [ ] I verified the CI pipeline passes locally if applicable * fix: hide provider and key action buttons based on RBAC permissions (#3296) ## Summary Improves RBAC enforcement across the configuration and providers UI by hiding action controls entirely when the user lacks the required permissions, rather than rendering them in a disabled state. ## Changes - The config layout now checks the current route to determine which RBAC resource to evaluate — `APIKeys` for `/workspace/config/api-keys` routes and `Settings` for all others, so users without API key access are not incorrectly blocked from other config pages. - The "Add Provider" dropdown is now conditionally rendered only when the user has provider create access, instead of always rendering with a disabled state. - The "Add new key" button in the model provider keys table is now hidden entirely when the user lacks update access, rather than being rendered as disabled. - The per-row actions dropdown menu (Edit/Delete) in the model provider keys table is now hidden entirely when the user has neither update nor delete access. ## Type of change - [ ] Bug fix - [x] Feature - [ ] Refactor - [ ] Documentation - [ ] Chore/CI ## Affected areas - [ ] Core (Go) - [ ] Transports (HTTP) - [ ] Providers/Integrations - [ ] Plugins - [x] UI (React) - [ ] Docs ## How to test 1. Log in as a user with restricted RBAC permissions (no `APIKeys` view access, no provider create/update/delete access). 2. Navigate to `/workspace/config/api-keys` — the no-permission view should be shown. 3. Navigate to another config page — it should load normally. 4. Navigate to the Providers page — the "Add Provider" dropdown should not be visible. 5. Open a provider's key table — the "Add new key" button and the per-row actions menu should not be visible. 6. Log in as a user with full access and verify all controls appear and function as expected. ```sh cd ui pnpm i || npm i pnpm build || npm run build ``` ## Screenshots/Recordings If UI changes, add before/after screenshots or short clips. ## Breaking changes - [ ] Yes - [x] No ## Related issues Link related issues and discussions. ## Security considerations These changes tighten UI-level RBAC enforcement by ensuring that action controls are not rendered at all for unauthorized users, reducing the surface area for accidental or misleading interactions. Server-side authorization remains the authoritative enforcement layer. ## Checklist - [ ] I read `docs/contributing/README.md` and followed the guidelines - [ ] I added/updated tests where appropriate - [ ] I updated documentation where needed - [ ] I verified builds succeed (Go and UI) - [ ] I verified the CI pipeline passes locally if applicable * fix: hide delete log button instead of disabling it when user lacks delete access (#3314) ## Summary The delete button in log tables was always rendered (just disabled) for users without delete access. This PR hides the actions column entirely when the user lacks delete permissions, and fixes the RBAC resource check for MCP logs to use the correct `MCPGateway` resource instead of `Logs`. ## Changes - The actions column in both the workspace logs and MCP logs tables is now conditionally included in the column definitions only when `hasDeleteAccess` is `true`, rather than always rendering a disabled button. - The delete button styling was updated to use more visible destructive colors (`text-destructive/60 border-destructive/60`) instead of the previous muted secondary foreground styles. - The RBAC resource used to gate delete access on the MCP logs page was corrected from `RbacResource.Logs` to `RbacResource.MCPGateway`. ## Type of change - [x] Bug fix - [ ] Feature - [ ] Refactor - [ ] Documentation - [ ] Chore/CI ## Affected areas - [ ] Core (Go) - [ ] Transports (HTTP) - [ ] Providers/Integrations - [ ] Plugins - [x] UI (React) - [ ] Docs ## How to test 1. Log in as a user **without** delete access on Logs or MCPGateway resources. 2. Navigate to the workspace logs page and the MCP logs page. 3. Verify the delete button/column is not visible. 4. Log in as a user **with** delete access. 5. Verify the delete button appears and is functional. ```sh cd ui pnpm i pnpm test pnpm build ``` ## Screenshots/Recordings Before: Delete button rendered but disabled for users without access. After: Delete column is hidden entirely for users without delete access. ## Breaking changes - [ ] Yes - [x] No ## Related issues ## Security considerations The RBAC fix ensures MCP log deletion is gated on the correct `MCPGateway` resource permission, preventing users with only `Logs` delete access from incorrectly being granted delete access to MCP logs. ## Checklist - [ ] I read `docs/contributing/README.md` and followed the guidelines - [ ] I added/updated tests where appropriate - [ ] I updated documentation where needed - [ ] I verified builds succeed (Go and UI) - [ ] I verified the CI pipeline passes locally if applicable * feat: add `MCPLogs` RBAC resource and enforce access control on MCP logs route and sidebar (#3316) ## Summary Introduces a dedicated `MCPLogs` RBAC resource, decoupling MCP log access control from the `MCPGateway` resource. This allows permissions for viewing and deleting MCP logs to be managed independently from gateway-level permissions. ## Changes - Added `MCPLogs` as a new `RbacResource` enum value in the fallback RBAC context. - The MCP Logs route now checks `MCPLogs` view permission and renders a `NoPermissionView` when access is denied, rather than rendering the page unconditionally. - Delete access on the MCP Logs page now checks `RbacResource.MCPLogs` instead of `RbacResource.MCPGateway`. - The sidebar MCP Logs entry now uses `hasMCPLogsAccess` (derived from `RbacResource.MCPLogs`) to control visibility, rather than reusing `hasMCPGatewayAccess`. ## Type of change - [ ] Bug fix - [x] Feature - [ ] Refactor - [ ] Documentation - [ ] Chore/CI ## Affected areas - [ ] Core (Go) - [ ] Transports (HTTP) - [ ] Providers/Integrations - [ ] Plugins - [x] UI (React) - [ ] Docs ## How to test 1. Configure a role that has `MCPGateway` access but **no** `MCPLogs` access. 2. Log in as a user with that role and navigate to the MCP Logs page — the `NoPermissionView` should be displayed and the sidebar entry should be hidden. 3. Grant the role `MCPLogs` view access and confirm the page and sidebar entry become accessible. 4. Verify that delete functionality on the MCP Logs page is gated by `MCPLogs` delete permission independently of `MCPGateway` delete permission. ```sh cd ui pnpm i || npm i pnpm test || npm test pnpm build || npm run build ``` ## Screenshots/Recordings N/A ## Breaking changes - [x] Yes - [ ] No Any role configuration that previously relied on `MCPGateway` permissions to grant access to MCP Logs will need to be updated to explicitly grant `MCPLogs` permissions. ## Related issues N/A ## Security considerations Access to MCP log data (which may contain sensitive tool execution details) is now enforced by a dedicated RBAC resource, reducing the risk of unintended access through overly broad `MCPGateway` permissions. ## Checklist - [ ] I read `docs/contributing/README.md` and followed the guidelines - [ ] I added/updated tests where appropriate - [ ] I updated documentation where needed - [ ] I verified builds succeed (Go and UI) - [ ] I verified the CI pipeline passes locally if applicable * feat: add `MCPToolGroups` RBAC resource and separate access control from `MCPGateway` (#3319) ## Summary Introduces a dedicated `MCPToolGroups` RBAC resource to allow fine-grained access control over the MCP Tool Groups section, independent of the broader `MCPGateway` resource. ## Changes - Added `MCPToolGroups` as a new `RbacResource` enum value in the fallback RBAC context. - Updated the MCP Tool Groups route layout to check `MCPToolGroups` view permission instead of `MCPGateway`. - Updated the sidebar so the "Tool Groups" sub-item uses `hasMCPToolGroupsAccess`, while the parent MCP nav item remains visible if the user has access to either `MCPGateway` or `MCPToolGroups`. ## Type of change - [ ] Bug fix - [x] Feature - [ ] Refactor - [ ] Documentation - [ ] Chore/CI ## Affected areas - [ ] Core (Go) - [ ] Transports (HTTP) - [ ] Providers/Integrations - [ ] Plugins - [x] UI (React) - [ ] Docs ## How to test 1. Configure a role that has access to `MCPGateway` but not `MCPToolGroups`. Verify the "Tool Groups" sidebar item is hidden and navigating to `/workspace/mcp-tool-groups` shows the no-permission view. 2. Configure a role with access to `MCPToolGroups` but not `MCPGateway`. Verify the "Tool Groups" sidebar item is visible and accessible, while other MCP Gateway sections remain restricted. 3. Configure a role with access to both. Verify all MCP sub-items are visible and accessible. ```sh cd ui pnpm i || npm i pnpm build || npm run build ``` ## Breaking changes - [ ] Yes - [x] No ## Related issues ## Security considerations Access to the MCP Tool Groups page is now governed by its own RBAC resource (`MCPToolGroups`), allowing enterprise deployments to restrict tool group management independently from MCP Gateway configuration. ## Checklist - [ ] I read `docs/contributing/README.md` and followed the guidelines - [ ] I added/updated tests where appropriate - [ ] I updated documentation where needed - [ ] I verified builds succeed (Go and UI) - [ ] I verified the CI pipeline passes locally if applicable * fix: remove 100-item upper limit on paginated teams query (#3323) ## Summary Removes the upper bound limit cap of 100 on paginated team queries, allowing callers to request more than 100 teams per page. ## Changes - Removed the `limit > 100` guard in `GetTeamsPaginated` that was silently capping the page size to 100. This allows consumers to specify larger page sizes when needed. ## Type of change - [ ] Bug fix - [x] Feature - [ ] Refactor - [ ] Documentation - [ ] Chore/CI ## Affected areas - [x] Core (Go) - [ ] Transports (HTTP) - [ ] Providers/Integrations - [ ] Plugins - [ ] UI (React) - [ ] Docs ## How to test ```sh go test ./... ``` Verify that a call to `GetTeamsPaginated` with a `limit` greater than 100 returns the expected number of results rather than being silently truncated to 100. ## Screenshots/Recordings N/A ## Breaking changes - [ ] Yes - [x] No ## Related issues ## Security considerations Removing the page size cap could allow large queries that put additional load on the database. Callers should ensure reasonable limits are enforced at the API layer if unbounded queries are a concern. ## Checklist - [ ] I read `docs/contributing/README.md` and followed the guidelines - [ ] I added/updated tests where appropriate - [ ] I updated documentation where needed - [ ] I verified builds succeed (Go and UI) - [ ] I verified the CI pipeline passes locally if applicable * feat: extend mcp plugin interface for list tools, ping and connections (#3389) ## Summary Briefly explain the purpose of this PR and the problem it solves. ## Changes - What was changed and why - Any notable design decisions or trade-offs ## Type of change - [ ] Bug fix - [ ] Feature - [ ] Refactor - [ ] Documentation - [ ] Chore/CI ## Affected areas - [ ] Core (Go) - [ ] Transports (HTTP) - [ ] Providers/Integrations - [ ] Plugins - [ ] UI (React) - [ ] Docs ## How to test Describe the steps to validate this change. Include commands and expected outcomes. ```sh # Core/Transports go version go test ./... # UI cd ui pnpm i || npm i pnpm test || npm test pnpm build || npm run build ``` If adding new configs or environment variables, document them here. ## Screenshots/Recordings If UI changes, add before/after screenshots or short clips. ## Breaking changes - [ ] Yes - [ ] No If yes, describe impact and migration instructions. ## Related issues Link related issues and discussions. Example: Closes #123 ## Security considerations Note any security implications (auth, secrets, PII, sandboxing, etc.). ## Checklist - [ ] I read `docs/contributing/README.md` and followed the guidelines - [ ] I added/updated tests where appropriate - [ ] I updated documentation where needed - [ ] I verified builds succeed (Go and UI) - [ ] I verified the CI pipeline passes locally if applicable * package bumps (#3422) ## Summary Bumps several Go dependencies to their latest patch versions across all modules in the repository. ## Changes - `github.com/aws/aws-sdk-go-v2/aws/protocol/eventstream` upgraded from `v1.7.8` → `v1.7.10` - `github.com/aws/smithy-go` upgraded from `v1.24.2` → `v1.25.1` - `github.com/jackc/pgx/v5` upgraded from `v5.9.1` → `v5.9.2` ## Type of change - [ ] Bug fix - [ ] Feature - [ ] Refactor - [ ] Documentation - [x] Chore/CI ## Affected areas - [x] Core (Go) - [x] Transports (HTTP) - [ ] Providers/Integrations - [x] Plugins - [ ] UI (React) - [ ] Docs ## How to test ```sh go test ./... ``` ## Breaking changes - [ ] Yes - [x] No ## Security considerations No security implications. These are routine patch-level dependency upgrades with no API surface changes. ## Checklist - [ ] I read `docs/contributing/README.md` and followed the guidelines - [ ] I added/updated tests where appropriate - [ ] I updated documentation where needed - [x] I verified builds succeed (Go and UI) - [ ] I verified the CI pipeline passes locally if applicable * fix: fixes model passthrough prefix stripping in advisor tool for anthropic --------- Co-authored-by: Suresh Chaudhary <83772622+impoiler@users.noreply.github.com> Co-authored-by: Pratham Mishra <99235987+Pratham-Mishra04@users.noreply.github.com> Co-authored-by: Akshay Deo <akshay@akshaydeo.com>

Summary
Improves RBAC enforcement across the configuration and providers UI by hiding action controls entirely when the user lacks the required permissions, rather than rendering them in a disabled state.
Changes
APIKeysfor/workspace/config/api-keysroutes andSettingsfor all others, so users without API key access are not incorrectly blocked from other config pages.Type of change
Affected areas
How to test
APIKeysview access, no provider create/update/delete access)./workspace/config/api-keys— the no-permission view should be shown.Screenshots/Recordings
If UI changes, add before/after screenshots or short clips.
Breaking changes
Related issues
Link related issues and discussions.
Security considerations
These changes tighten UI-level RBAC enforcement by ensuring that action controls are not rendered at all for unauthorized users, reducing the surface area for accidental or misleading interactions. Server-side authorization remains the authoritative enforcement layer.
Checklist
docs/contributing/README.mdand followed the guidelines