Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

refactor(test): performance and code readbility improvements #36

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Jul 25, 2023

Conversation

fabienzucchet
Copy link
Collaborator

@fabienzucchet fabienzucchet commented Jul 24, 2023

Various code improvements:

  • make file splitting into chunks linear instead of quadratic
  • cleaner code for generating test reports

@github-actions
Copy link
Contributor

github-actions bot commented Jul 24, 2023

LOGAF Level 2 - /home/runner/work/code-review-gpt/code-review-gpt/src/review/prompt/constructPrompt.ts

1. Error Handling: The readFiles function currently logs an error message and continues execution when a file fails to be processed. This could lead to unexpected behavior later in the code if the error is not properly handled. Consider throwing the error to halt execution, or handle the error in a way that the rest of the code can safely continue.

try {
  const fileContent = await readFile(fileName, "utf8");
  files.push({ fileName, fileContent });
} catch (error) {
  throw new Error(`Failed to process file ${fileName}: ${error}`);
}

2. Performance: The splitFilesIntoBatches function could be optimized. Currently, it iterates over the files array and checks the size of each file individually. Consider calculating the size of all files beforehand and storing them in a separate array or map. This would reduce the number of times the getSizeOfReviewFile function is called.


LOGAF Level 3 - /home/runner/work/code-review-gpt/code-review-gpt/src/test/run/generateTestReport.ts

1. Code Duplication: The generateTestReport and displayDetailedReport functions both contain similar code for generating a report. Consider creating a helper function to generate a report to reduce code duplication.

const generateReport = (testCase: TestCase, review: string, similarReview: string) => `
 > Test case snippet: ${testCase.snippet}

===============================================================================

 > Review:
${review}
===============================================================================

> Similar review:
${similarReview}

`;

2. Magic Numbers: The determineTestResult function uses magic numbers (1, 2). Consider defining these numbers as constants at the top of your file to improve readability and maintainability.

const MAX_SIMILARITY_SCORE = 1;
const WARNING_THRESHOLD_MULTIPLIER = 2;

3. Error Handling: The formatTestResult function throws an error for an unknown test result. Consider defining a default case in the switch statement to handle unknown test results gracefully.


🚫🔄🔢


Powered by Code Review GPT

@github-actions
Copy link
Contributor

github-actions bot commented Jul 24, 2023

Test results summary:

✅ [PASS] - Test case: Bad variable name
✅ [PASS] - Test case: Exposed secret
✅ [PASS] - Test case: Too many nested loops
✅ [PASS] - Test case: Unawaited Promise

SUMMARY: ✅ PASS: 4 - ⚠️ WARN: 0 - ❌ FAIL: 0


Tests Powered by Code Review GPT

@fabienzucchet fabienzucchet force-pushed the refactor/test/code-improvements-for-test branch 7 times, most recently from 7e6fc88 to bd6155a Compare July 24, 2023 16:54
@fabienzucchet fabienzucchet force-pushed the refactor/test/code-improvements-for-test branch from bd6155a to 539092b Compare July 24, 2023 16:57
@fabienzucchet fabienzucchet merged commit e7867ec into main Jul 25, 2023
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants