Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Feat/quick demo #256

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Sep 7, 2023
Merged

Feat/quick demo #256

merged 2 commits into from
Sep 7, 2023

Conversation

mattzcarey
Copy link
Owner

No description provided.

@mattzcarey mattzcarey merged commit 9a5c871 into main Sep 7, 2023
@mattzcarey mattzcarey deleted the feat/quick-demo branch September 7, 2023 13:07
@github-actions
Copy link
Contributor

github-actions bot commented Sep 7, 2023

Risk Level 2 - /home/runner/work/code-review-gpt/code-review-gpt/services/web-app/src/app/installation/page.tsx

The risk score for this pull request is 2.

The changes in this pull request add an import statement for InstallationInstructions from ../../lib/installation and use it in the ReactMarkdown component. The code appears to be adding installation instructions to a page.

Suggestions:

  1. It is recommended to add a comment or documentation explaining the purpose of the InstallationInstructions and how it should be used.

Example:

// Import the installation instructions from the lib
import { InstallationInstructions } from \"../../lib/installation\";

// Use the InstallationInstructions in the ReactMarkdown component
<ReactMarkdown className=\"markdown\" children={InstallationInstructions} />
  1. Consider using a more descriptive variable or constant name instead of InstallationInstructions to improve code readability.

Example:

import { installationInstructions } from \"../../lib/installation\";

<ReactMarkdown className=\"markdown\" children={installationInstructions} />

🔍📝👍


Powered by Code Review GPT

@github-actions
Copy link
Contributor

github-actions bot commented Sep 7, 2023

Test results summary:

✅ [PASS] - Test case: Bad variable name
❌ [FAIL] - Test case: Exposed secret
✅ [PASS] - Test case: Too many nested loops
⚠️ [WARN] - Test case: Unawaited Promise

SUMMARY: ✅ PASS: 2 - ⚠️ WARN: 1 - ❌ FAIL: 1


Tests Powered by Code Review GPT

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant