Feat/update api key

[lizacullis]

Validation:

Update Api Key Button:

Update Api Key dialog:

Hashed value before change:

Hashed value after change

[github-actions]

Risk Level 2 - /home/runner/work/code-review-gpt/code-review-gpt/services/core/functions/update-user/index.ts

• The request does not contain a body as expected. This could lead to unexpected behavior if the code relies on the body being present. Consider adding proper error handling or validation for this case.
• The request body does not contain the expected data. This could lead to unexpected behavior if the code relies on the apiKey and email being present. Consider adding proper error handling or validation for this case.
• The code is using the deprecated conditions option in the update method of the UserEntity. Consider updating the code to use the recommended approach for conditional updates.
• The error message returned when updating the user is not informative and could make troubleshooting difficult. Consider providing a more detailed error message to help identify the issue.

---

Risk Level 2 - /home/runner/work/code-review-gpt/code-review-gpt/services/web-app/src/components/buttons/updateApiKey.tsx

The code changes in this file have a low risk to the code base. The changes add a new component called 'UpdateAPIKey' which is a form for updating an API key. The code follows SOLID principles and is readable and clean. No potential bugs or performance issues were found.

---

Risk Level 3 - /home/runner/work/code-review-gpt/code-review-gpt/services/web-app/src/app/profile/page.tsx

• The code is missing error handling for the getUser API request. Consider adding proper error handling to handle failed requests.
• The code is missing error handling for the updateUser API request. Consider adding proper error handling to handle failed requests.
• The code is using console.log to log error messages. Consider using a proper logging library or displaying error messages to the user for better error handling and troubleshooting.
• The code is using the deprecated useAxios hook. Consider updating the code to use the recommended approach for making API requests.
• The code is using the deprecated next-auth/react package. Consider updating the code to use the recommended approach for session management.
• The code is using the deprecated next/image package. Consider updating the code to use the recommended approach for image optimization.
• The code is using the deprecated JSON.parse method to parse the response data. Consider updating the code to use the recommended approach for parsing JSON data.
• The code is missing proper loading state handling. Consider adding a loading state indicator while the data is being fetched.
• The code is missing proper error state handling. Consider displaying an error message to the user when the data cannot be retrieved.
• The code is directly accessing the data property of the response object without proper null checks. Consider adding null checks to avoid potential errors.
• The code is directly accessing the user property of the session object without proper null checks. Consider adding null checks to avoid potential errors.
• The code is directly accessing the email property of the user object without proper null checks. Consider adding null checks to avoid potential errors.
• The code is directly accessing the pictureUrl property of the user object without proper null checks. Consider adding null checks to avoid potential errors.
• The code is directly accessing the repos property of the user object without proper null checks. Consider adding null checks to avoid potential errors.
• The code is using a custom UpdateAPIKey component without providing its implementation. Consider adding the implementation of the UpdateAPIKey component or removing the import if it is not used.

---

🔍🔧🚨

---

Powered by Code Review GPT

[github-actions]

Test results summary:

✅ [PASS] - Test case: Bad variable name
❌ [FAIL] - Test case: Exposed secret
✅ [PASS] - Test case: Too many nested loops
⚠️ [WARN] - Test case: Unawaited Promise

SUMMARY: ✅ PASS: 2 - ⚠️ WARN: 1 - ❌ FAIL: 1

---

Tests Powered by Code Review GPT

[lizacullis]

This is temporary and will be changed in the next ticket

[mattzcarey]

Generally prefer to use tailwind utility classes rather than custom CSS but looks good.

[lizacullis]

Okay! Will remember that for future! Mostly did this because it was the example given my radix!