Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

[NPM Packaging] Use Risk level instead of LOGAF #80

Closed
mattzcarey opened this issue Aug 2, 2023 · 0 comments · Fixed by #95
Closed

[NPM Packaging] Use Risk level instead of LOGAF #80

mattzcarey opened this issue Aug 2, 2023 · 0 comments · Fixed by #95
Assignees
@mattzcarey

Comments

@mattzcarey
Copy link
Owner

mattzcarey commented Aug 2, 2023 •
edited
Loading

Description:
Some formatting with the comment to make it look nicer.

No one knows what LOGAF means. Use Risk and rate 1 low -> 5 high.
Also add Review to the sign off
@mattzcarey mattzcarey converted this from a draft issue Aug 2, 2023
@mattzcarey mattzcarey self-assigned this Aug 2, 2023
@ChristianN1234 ChristianN1234 moved this from Daily goals to Sprint Backlog in Code Review GPT Roadmap Aug 4, 2023
@mattzcarey mattzcarey changed the title [NPM Packaging] Use Severity level instead of LOGAF [NPM Packaging] Use Risk level instead of LOGAF Aug 6, 2023
@mattzcarey mattzcarey moved this from Sprint Backlog to Code Review in Code Review GPT Roadmap Aug 6, 2023
@mattzcarey mattzcarey mentioned this issue Aug 6, 2023
Merged
@github-project-automation github-project-automation bot moved this from Code Review to Done in Code Review GPT Roadmap Aug 7, 2023
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees

@mattzcarey mattzcarey

Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.

feat(): reviewType and new prompt construction method mattzcarey/code-review-gpt
1 participant
@mattzcarey