-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 136
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Add gitlab support #192
Add gitlab support #192
Conversation
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Thanks for submitting this PR!
I am requesting some changes here and also I think the CI_MERGE_REQUEST_ID
or CI_MERGE_REQUEST_IID
should be covered to get the Merge Request ID (corresponding to PR number)
I didn't really understand what you meant by: |
Your PR introduces use of Can you please verify? |
Co-authored-by: gdm85 <[email protected]>
Co-authored-by: gdm85 <[email protected]>
I work by mirroring my github to gitlab so I can't really verify that super easily. What did you have in mind, I'll do my best? |
I created a temporary repo to test this fork, I always got an ambigious message of a
Pipeline example: https://gitlab.com/agmore1/testgoveralls/-/jobs/850406137 |
That sounds like a bug in coveralls.io itself; cc @nickmerwin @agamm please update your project to use
I think what we need here is the MR ID, so that coveralls.io can link back to GitLab with the right reference. Similarly, for GitHub it's the PR number not the unique PR ID across all projects. |
I tried updating from master but there were no new changes, I did change the merge request id to Seems to still fail: |
@gdm85 any update? |
@agamm that |
Fixes #191