-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 11
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Simplify Field API using generics #44
Merged
Merged
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Are the different |
wiggin77
reviewed
Nov 10, 2023
wiggin77
reviewed
Nov 10, 2023
wiggin77
reviewed
Nov 10, 2023
wiggin77
reviewed
Nov 10, 2023
wiggin77
reviewed
Nov 10, 2023
wiggin77
reviewed
Nov 10, 2023
wiggin77
reviewed
Nov 10, 2023
wiggin77
reviewed
Nov 10, 2023
wiggin77
approved these changes
Nov 10, 2023
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
LGTM 👍 Some minor typos to fix.
Co-authored-by: Doug Lauder <[email protected]>
Co-authored-by: Doug Lauder <[email protected]>
hanzei
added
4: Reviews Complete
All reviewers have approved the pull request
Do Not Merge/Awaiting PR
Awaiting another pull request before merging (e.g. server changes)
and removed
2: Dev Review
Requires review by a core committer
labels
Nov 13, 2023
Thanks for the review @wiggin77 👍 Can we merge the PR? |
hanzei
removed
the
Do Not Merge/Awaiting PR
Awaiting another pull request before merging (e.g. server changes)
label
Nov 13, 2023
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Summary
Internally,
logr
threads typed that allow Type conversions to "higher" types the same. E.g. anint32
get converted into anint64
anyway.By adding generics field functions for each "class" of types, the API becomes simpler to read and use. No type conversions are needed on the callers' side.
All field functions also allow the usage of type definition without type conversions from the caller.
To summarize:
Int
replacesInt32
andInt64
Uint
replacesUint32
andUint64
Float
replacesFloat32
andFloat64
I thought about consolidating the fields even further, but that adds problems with
gojay
.Based on top of #43
Ticket Link
None