This repository has been archived by the owner on Apr 26, 2024. It is now read-only.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Implement MSC2176: Updated redaction rules #8984
Implement MSC2176: Updated redaction rules #8984
Changes from 5 commits
32e3692
8893bd6
2d09478
402aabb
f8f5b03
1f35bb9
8ae3273
479f333
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Jump to
There are no files selected for viewing
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Note that this is really matrix-org/matrix-spec-proposals#2174. I suspect further changes are needed to support this although I'm not 100% sure what.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Looks like this covers the requirements for MSC2176. Any further changes can be in a separate MSC2174 impl.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
The only odd thing about this is that currently a redaction event doesn't have the redacts keyword, so I think this will generally raise an exception. (Note that the tests somewhat skip this by manually creating an event that does have the proper keyword.)
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I'm not sure MSC2174 actually requires this.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Ah, I think I misread the
add_fields
code, I was afraid it would break unless MSC2174 was implemented, but it should be OK.MSC2174 doesn't require this, but MSC2176 requires it "assuming that MSC2174 is merged".