This repository has been archived by the owner on Apr 26, 2024. It is now read-only.
-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 2.1k
Implement MSC2176: Updated redaction rules #8984
Merged
Merged
Changes from 7 commits
Commits
Show all changes
8 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
32e3692
Add a new room version for MSC2176.
clokep 8893bd6
Update the redaction logic from MSC2176.
clokep 2d09478
Re-organize tests a bit.
clokep 402aabb
Add changelog.
clokep f8f5b03
Merge remote-tracking branch 'origin/develop' into clokep/msc2176
clokep 1f35bb9
Review comments.
clokep 8ae3273
Remove a space.
clokep 479f333
Clarify comments.
clokep File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change |
---|---|---|
@@ -0,0 +1 @@ | ||
Implement [MSC2176](https://github.com/matrix-org/matrix-doc/pull/2176) in an experimental room version. |
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Oops, something went wrong.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Note that this is really matrix-org/matrix-spec-proposals#2174. I suspect further changes are needed to support this although I'm not 100% sure what.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Looks like this covers the requirements for MSC2176. Any further changes can be in a separate MSC2174 impl.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
The only odd thing about this is that currently a redaction event doesn't have the redacts keyword, so I think this will generally raise an exception. (Note that the tests somewhat skip this by manually creating an event that does have the proper keyword.)
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I'm not sure MSC2174 actually requires this.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Ah, I think I misread the
add_fields
code, I was afraid it would break unless MSC2174 was implemented, but it should be OK.MSC2174 doesn't require this, but MSC2176 requires it "assuming that MSC2174 is merged".