-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 2.1k
Ratelimit cross user room key share requests. #8957
Conversation
1797e64
to
142ee5a
Compare
There's some open questions here so requesting review on it, although I'm not quite sure it is ready for merging. |
@erikjohnston I've made some updates, let me know if this looks better. It is much closer to #8675 now. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Yeah, this looks good! I should say that I do think it would be good to rate limit EDUs more broadly, but it's a bit complicated to work out the correct strategy for the various types.
a4568fb
to
d36c7b0
Compare
I think the failing builds are due to not updating the sytest config. We should settle on reasonable defaults first before updating it. |
@erikjohnston Any idea of how to get this? Is there something in grafana we can check? |
I think I'd probably look in the logs (or DB) to see what the usual pattern was. I'm OK with us having quite a high burst count, as the major issue was when we sent tonnes. |
Looking at the logs it does not seem uncommon for a client to send several hundred of these requests per second (sometimes sustained for a few seconds). There are also instances of several thousands sends per second (again sometimes sustained for for a few seconds). So maybe something like a 50 per second, burst count of 500? I'm not sure if that sounds too high. |
Err, wow. What's happening there? I thought you should only send key share requests to your own devices? Are these accounts with huge numbers of devices? |
Oh wait, those numbers are all |
Looking just at the What were you thinking of as a "high" burst count? |
@erikjohnston I'm not really sure where to go with this one -- I can share the data I have with you though and see what you think? |
Ugh, I really don't know TBH. I thought that cross user room key requests should be relatively rare, so I have no idea if a high burst count makes sense. OTOH, they shouldn't be toooo important so getting the value wrong isn't the end of the world, plus we only really need to protect from out of control clients. I think next steps are:
|
I had a discussion with @callahad where he suggested lowering these to a level we're comfortable with since it is better than the status-quo of dropping them. |
e363c53
to
4f72389
Compare
Co-authored-by: Erik Johnston <[email protected]>
Synapse 1.29.0 (2021-03-08) =========================== Note that synapse now expects an `X-Forwarded-Proto` header when used with a reverse proxy. Please see [UPGRADE.rst](UPGRADE.rst#upgrading-to-v1290) for more details on this change. No significant changes. Synapse 1.29.0rc1 (2021-03-04) ============================== Features -------- - Add rate limiters to cross-user key sharing requests. ([\#8957](matrix-org/synapse#8957)) - Add `order_by` to the admin API `GET /_synapse/admin/v1/users/<user_id>/media`. Contributed by @dklimpel. ([\#8978](matrix-org/synapse#8978)) - Add some configuration settings to make users' profile data more private. ([\#9203](matrix-org/synapse#9203)) - The `no_proxy` and `NO_PROXY` environment variables are now respected in proxied HTTP clients with the lowercase form taking precedence if both are present. Additionally, the lowercase `https_proxy` environment variable is now respected in proxied HTTP clients on top of existing support for the uppercase `HTTPS_PROXY` form and takes precedence if both are present. Contributed by Timothy Leung. ([\#9372](matrix-org/synapse#9372)) - Add a configuration option, `user_directory.prefer_local_users`, which when enabled will make it more likely for users on the same server as you to appear above other users. ([\#9383](matrix-org/synapse#9383), [\#9385](matrix-org/synapse#9385)) - Add support for regenerating thumbnails if they have been deleted but the original image is still stored. ([\#9438](matrix-org/synapse#9438)) - Add support for `X-Forwarded-Proto` header when using a reverse proxy. ([\#9472](matrix-org/synapse#9472), [\#9501](matrix-org/synapse#9501), [\#9512](matrix-org/synapse#9512), [\#9539](matrix-org/synapse#9539)) Bugfixes -------- - Fix a bug where users' pushers were not all deleted when they deactivated their account. ([\#9285](matrix-org/synapse#9285), [\#9516](matrix-org/synapse#9516)) - Fix a bug where a lot of unnecessary presence updates were sent when joining a room. ([\#9402](matrix-org/synapse#9402)) - Fix a bug that caused multiple calls to the experimental `shared_rooms` endpoint to return stale results. ([\#9416](matrix-org/synapse#9416)) - Fix a bug in single sign-on which could cause a "No session cookie found" error. ([\#9436](matrix-org/synapse#9436)) - Fix bug introduced in v1.27.0 where allowing a user to choose their own username when logging in via single sign-on did not work unless an `idp_icon` was defined. ([\#9440](matrix-org/synapse#9440)) - Fix a bug introduced in v1.26.0 where some sequences were not properly configured when running `synapse_port_db`. ([\#9449](matrix-org/synapse#9449)) - Fix deleting pushers when using sharded pushers. ([\#9465](matrix-org/synapse#9465), [\#9466](matrix-org/synapse#9466), [\#9479](matrix-org/synapse#9479), [\#9536](matrix-org/synapse#9536)) - Fix missing startup checks for the consistency of certain PostgreSQL sequences. ([\#9470](matrix-org/synapse#9470)) - Fix a long-standing bug where the media repository could leak file descriptors while previewing media. ([\#9497](matrix-org/synapse#9497)) - Properly purge the event chain cover index when purging history. ([\#9498](matrix-org/synapse#9498)) - Fix missing chain cover index due to a schema delta not being applied correctly. Only affected servers that ran development versions. ([\#9503](matrix-org/synapse#9503)) - Fix a bug introduced in v1.25.0 where `/_synapse/admin/join/` would fail when given a room alias. ([\#9506](matrix-org/synapse#9506)) - Prevent presence background jobs from running when presence is disabled. ([\#9530](matrix-org/synapse#9530)) - Fix rare edge case that caused a background update to fail if the server had rejected an event that had duplicate auth events. ([\#9537](matrix-org/synapse#9537)) Improved Documentation ---------------------- - Update the example systemd config to propagate reloads to individual units. ([\#9463](matrix-org/synapse#9463)) Internal Changes ---------------- - Add documentation and type hints to `parse_duration`. ([\#9432](matrix-org/synapse#9432)) - Remove vestiges of `uploads_path` configuration setting. ([\#9462](matrix-org/synapse#9462)) - Add a comment about systemd-python. ([\#9464](matrix-org/synapse#9464)) - Test that we require validated email for email pushers. ([\#9496](matrix-org/synapse#9496)) - Allow python to generate bytecode for synapse. ([\#9502](matrix-org/synapse#9502)) - Fix incorrect type hints. ([\#9515](matrix-org/synapse#9515), [\#9518](matrix-org/synapse#9518)) - Add type hints to device and event report admin API. ([\#9519](matrix-org/synapse#9519)) - Add type hints to user admin API. ([\#9521](matrix-org/synapse#9521)) - Bump the versions of mypy and mypy-zope used for static type checking. ([\#9529](matrix-org/synapse#9529))
)" (#9668) We patched `matrix-org-hotfixes` a little while ago in #8675 to drop any cross-user key share requests while they were being accidentally spammed by a client. This was a temporary fix until we had some rate-limiting in place. Rate-limiting landed in #8957. Note that the rate-limit can't be configured, but has what appear to be [sensible defaults](https://github.com/matrix-org/synapse/blob/db2efa9c50569adbfab102b1f447f5a8312b95f3/synapse/config/ratelimiting.py#L105-L113). Note that the original patch was already actually overridden partially when the rate-limit PR landed, as they conflicted. So we've already lifted the restriction between local devices on matrix.org, but requests were still blocked from being sent over federation. This PR cleans up the remaining bits. This reverts commit d60af93.
This is an attempt to fix #8677.
A couple of open questions: