Skip to content
This repository has been archived by the owner on Apr 26, 2024. It is now read-only.

Add a Postgres REPLICA IDENTITY to tables that do not have an implicit one. This should allow use of Postgres logical replication. #16456

Merged
merged 12 commits into from
Nov 13, 2023

Conversation

reivilibre
Copy link
Contributor

Fixes: #16224

Base: develop

Original commit schedule, with full messages:

  1. Add Postgres replica identities to tables that don't have an implicit one
    Fixes All tables in Postgres should have a REPLICA IDENTITY available so that Postgres logical replication can be used #16224

@reivilibre reivilibre force-pushed the rei/replica_identities branch 6 times, most recently from ad592a0 to 417f5c0 Compare October 9, 2023 15:22
@reivilibre reivilibre marked this pull request as ready for review October 9, 2023 16:40
@reivilibre reivilibre requested a review from a team as a code owner October 9, 2023 16:40
tests/storage/test_database.py Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
@clokep
Copy link
Member

clokep commented Nov 13, 2023

Although looks like your new test is failing?

@reivilibre
Copy link
Contributor Author

Although looks like your new test is failing?

oid is a 'hidden attribute' in Postgres 11 (but not 12+) which means you have to be very explicit about selecting it, it turns out.

Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Ah I think these will all go away in #16522, but no reason not to have it be correct for now.

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

ohhhh that's why these were there a while ago, went away and now came back

@reivilibre reivilibre merged commit 69afe3f into develop Nov 13, 2023
39 of 41 checks passed
@reivilibre reivilibre deleted the rei/replica_identities branch November 13, 2023 16:03
erikjohnston added a commit that referenced this pull request Nov 16, 2023
…an implicit one. This should allow use of Postgres logical replication. (#16456)"

This reverts commit 69afe3f.
@erikjohnston erikjohnston mentioned this pull request Nov 16, 2023
erikjohnston added a commit that referenced this pull request Nov 16, 2023
…an implicit one. This should allow use of Postgres logical replication. (#16456)"

This reverts commit 69afe3f.
erikjohnston added a commit that referenced this pull request Nov 16, 2023
…an implicit one. This should allow use of Postgres logical replication. (#16456)" (#16651)

This reverts commit 69afe3f.
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
2 participants