This repository has been archived by the owner on Apr 26, 2024. It is now read-only.
-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 2.1k
Log stack traces when a missing opentracing span is detected #10983
Merged
squahtx
merged 2 commits into
develop
from
squah/add_stack_traces_to_missing_span_errors
Oct 5, 2021
Merged
Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
2 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change |
---|---|---|
@@ -0,0 +1 @@ | ||
Log stack traces when a missing opentracing span is detected. |
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Nice---didn't know about this! (
traceback.print_stack
is my go-to)There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
sentry has a bug where each line of some stack traces gets turned into a separate issue. I'm hoping this makes it get filed correctly.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
that's a synapse/twisted bug rather than a sentry bug. Basically uncaught exceptions end up getting printed to
sys.stderr
, but synapse intercepts things written tosys.stderr
and sends them back to the logger, at ERROR level, line by line; there they are of course intercepted by the sentry handler.The correct solution would be to not have uncaught exceptions printed to
sys.stderr
, and just let the interpreter-level uncaught exception hook handle them (where sentry will correctly report them). Unfortunately that's happening within the bowels of Twisted, so the next best solution is to make sure there aren't any uncaught exceptions coming from our code.There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
interesting, thanks for clearing things up!