Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Spec reference relationships #1206

Merged
merged 6 commits into from
Oct 18, 2022
Merged

Spec reference relationships #1206

merged 6 commits into from
Oct 18, 2022

Conversation

turt2live
Copy link
Member

@turt2live turt2live commented Aug 9, 2022

@turt2live turt2live marked this pull request as ready for review August 9, 2022 21:47
@turt2live turt2live requested a review from a team as a code owner August 9, 2022 21:47
content/client-server-api/modules/reference_relations.md Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
}
```

The [bundle](#aggregations) under `m.relations` would appear similar to the following:
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

s/bundle/aggregation/ ?

Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I think this is a bundle, in reference to the same language m.replace uses.

content/client-server-api/modules/reference_relations.md Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
content/client-server-api/modules/reference_relations.md Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
Copy link
Member

@richvdh richvdh left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

lgtm

@@ -2639,4 +2640,5 @@ systems.
{{< cs-module name="moderation_policies" >}}
{{< cs-module name="spaces" >}}
{{< cs-module name="event_replacements" >}}
{{< cs-module name="threading" >}}
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I noticed recently that I'd forgotten to update the table at https://spec.matrix.org/unstable/client-server-api/#summary for message edits. We should probably do so for threading?

Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

yea, we should indeed. Will take a look in a different PR.

@turt2live turt2live merged commit b2cc836 into main Oct 18, 2022
@turt2live turt2live deleted the travis/ref-rel branch October 18, 2022 17:50
clokep pushed a commit to clokep/matrix-spec that referenced this pull request May 3, 2023
* Spec reference relationships

MSC: matrix-org/matrix-spec-proposals#3267

* Apply suggestions from code review

Co-authored-by: Richard van der Hoff <[email protected]>

* Edits per code review

Co-authored-by: Richard van der Hoff <[email protected]>
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants