Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Clarify exactly what StrippedState is #2067

Merged
merged 5 commits into from
Jun 7, 2019
Merged

Conversation

turt2live
Copy link
Member

Fixes #2066

The expectation everywhere is that the sender is required. /initialSync references StrippedState through a m.room.member event reference, and does not need editing.

Fixes #2066

The expectation everywhere is that the `sender` is required. `/initialSync` references StrippedState through a `m.room.member` event reference, and does not need editing.
@turt2live turt2live added the Matrix 1.0 Spec PRs that need review for 1.0 label Jun 2, 2019
@turt2live turt2live requested a review from a team June 2, 2019 23:42
Copy link
Member

@KitsuneRal KitsuneRal left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM from client-server perspective.

@turt2live
Copy link
Member Author

requesting review for the server-side (which is just a passthrough)

@turt2live turt2live requested a review from a team June 5, 2019 16:38
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Matrix 1.0 Spec PRs that need review for 1.0
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

StrippedState schema is inconsistent
3 participants