Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

remove references to presence lists #1817

Merged
merged 4 commits into from
Feb 1, 2019
Merged

Conversation

neilisfragile
Copy link
Contributor

Relates #1810

@neilisfragile neilisfragile requested a review from a team January 28, 2019 15:12
@turt2live
Copy link
Member

Something like this surely needs an MSC as it's a spec change? It'd be even better if the feature were replaced by something more usable as well.

@neilisfragile
Copy link
Contributor Author

neilisfragile commented Jan 28, 2019

MSC

Copy link
Member

@turt2live turt2live left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This overall LGTM for once the MSC lands. In the meantime, we should also remove the schemas for those EDUs if we don't plan on using them.

Copy link
Member

@KitsuneRal KitsuneRal left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM, aside from one typo and assuming there are no other places referring to presence list.

A presence list is a list of user IDs whose presence the user wants to follow.
To be added to this list, the user being added must be invited by the list owner
who must accept the invitation.
and transmitted as an ``m.presence`` event. Presence event are sent to
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Either 'Presence event is' or 'Presence events are'.

Copy link
Member

@turt2live turt2live left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thanks for updating this. LGTM once the MSC clears FCP (assuming no changes)

@turt2live
Copy link
Member

(landing this with anticipation that the FCPs are going to clear just fine - if this changes, we'll do the needed)

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants