Skip to content

Conversation

gsmafra
Copy link
Contributor

@gsmafra gsmafra commented Sep 28, 2025

Let me know if this is helpful, and if you prefer more granular or coarse PRs

@gsmafra gsmafra changed the title chapter - 05 fix grammar chapter 05 - fix grammar Sep 28, 2025
@gsmafra gsmafra changed the title chapter 05 - fix grammar chapter 05/06 - fix grammar Sep 28, 2025
"$\n",
"\n",
"We also think that different levels of risk and line have different propensity of doing an agreement, so we will mark them as also causing agreement. As for email and agreement, we could make an argument that some people just read the subject of the email and that makes them more likely to make an agreement. The point is that email could also cause agreement without passing through open.\n",
"We also think that different levels of risk and limit have different propensity of doing an agreement, so we will mark them as also causing agreement. As for email and agreement, we could make an argument that some people just read the subject of the email and that makes them more likely to make an agreement. The point is that email could also cause agreement without passing through open.\n",
Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Not grammar, but keeping vocabulary consistency

Comment on lines +1512 to +1516
"1. Adding a dummy for paying the entire debt when trying to estimate the effect of a collections strategy on payments.\n",
"2. Controlling for white vs blue collar jobs when trying to estimate the effect of schooling on earnings\n",
"3. Controlling for conversion when estimating the impact of interest rates on loan duration\n",
"4. Controlling for marital happiness when estimating the impact of children on extramarital affairs\n",
"5. Breaking up payments modeling $E[Payments]$ into one binary model that predicts if payment will happen and another model that predict how much payment will happen given that some will: $E[Payments|Payments>0]*P(Payments>0)$\n",
Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Current rendering makes this a code block. Removing tabs makes it text. Tested with a local build: jupyter-book build causal-inference-for-the-brave-and-true

@gsmafra gsmafra changed the title chapter 05/06 - fix grammar chapter 05/06/07 - fix grammar and style Oct 1, 2025
@gsmafra gsmafra changed the title chapter 05/06/07 - fix grammar and style chapter 05/06/07 - fix grammar and rendering Oct 1, 2025
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant