Skip to content

Conversation

@affeldt-aist
Copy link
Member

Motivation for this change

fixes #1733

what about this fix?

@garrigue @gregweng

Checklist
  • added corresponding entries in CHANGELOG_UNRELEASED.md

- [ ] added corresponding documentation in the headers

Reference: How to document

Merge policy

As a rule of thumb:

  • PRs with several commits that make sense individually and that
    all compile are preferentially merged into master.
  • PRs with disorganized commits are very likely to be squash-rebased.
Reminder to reviewers

@affeldt-aist affeldt-aist added this to the 1.14.0 milestone Oct 30, 2025
@affeldt-aist affeldt-aist added the enhancement ✨ This issue/PR is about adding new features enhancing the library label Oct 30, 2025
theories/exp.v Outdated
by rewrite -ler_expR expR0 lnK.
Qed.

Lemma ln_eq0 x : (ln x == 0) = (x <= 0) || (x == 1).
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I am afraid of respecting the default value in an equality lemma like this.
Can we add 0< x as a hypothesis or add a warning to this lemma?

Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

The last commit does that, so I guess it is ok to merge now.

@affeldt-aist affeldt-aist merged commit 00514bb into math-comp:master Nov 6, 2025
46 checks passed
@affeldt-aist affeldt-aist deleted the fixes_1733 branch November 6, 2025 14:29
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

enhancement ✨ This issue/PR is about adding new features enhancing the library

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

ln_eq0

2 participants