Skip to content

Conversation

affeldt-aist
Copy link
Member

@affeldt-aist affeldt-aist commented Sep 11, 2025

Motivation for this change

fixes #1714

@hoheinzollern In fact, this lemma is coming from Natalia's development.
But since it used there, it is fair to commit it to MCA.
I renamed it to lt0_adde since adde_lt0 rather suggests a goal of the shape _ + _ < 0, which is not the case.

Checklist
  • added corresponding entries in CHANGELOG_UNRELEASED.md

- [ ] added corresponding documentation in the headers

Reference: How to document

Merge policy

As a rule of thumb:

  • PRs with several commits that make sense individually and that
    all compile are preferentially merged into master.
  • PRs with disorganized commits are very likely to be squash-rebased.
Reminder to reviewers

Co-authored-by: Alessandro Bruni <[email protected]>
@affeldt-aist affeldt-aist added this to the 1.14.0 milestone Sep 11, 2025
@affeldt-aist affeldt-aist added the enhancement ✨ This issue/PR is about adding new features enhancing the library label Sep 11, 2025
@affeldt-aist
Copy link
Member Author

ping @hoheinzollern

Copy link
Member

@hoheinzollern hoheinzollern left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

lgtm

@affeldt-aist affeldt-aist merged commit 8e76917 into math-comp:master Sep 18, 2025
66 of 67 checks passed
hoheinzollern added a commit to hoheinzollern/analysis that referenced this pull request Sep 22, 2025
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

enhancement ✨ This issue/PR is about adding new features enhancing the library

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Lemma nadde_lt0 is too restrictive

2 participants