Skip to content

Conversation

Tragicus
Copy link
Collaborator

@Tragicus Tragicus commented Aug 23, 2025

Motivation for this change

Adds a lemma strengthening a limit to deleted neighbourhood under injectivity.

Checklist
  • added corresponding entries in CHANGELOG_UNRELEASED.md
  • added corresponding documentation in the headers

Reference: How to document

Merge policy

As a rule of thumb:

  • PRs with several commits that make sense individually and that
    all compile are preferentially merged into master.
  • PRs with disorganized commits are very likely to be squash-rebased.
Reminder to reviewers

Co-authored-by: mkerjean
by have [->|] := eqVneq y x; [by apply: nbhs_singleton|near: y].
Unshelve. all: by end_near. Qed.

Lemma within_continuous_withinNx
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I propose to use the identifier continuous_injective_withinNx because within_continuous is used most of the time for lemmas involving the {within _, continuous _} notation. Moreover within's appear both in the conclusion of the statement while they are far apart in the current lemma identifier.

@affeldt-aist affeldt-aist self-requested a review September 13, 2025 01:49
@affeldt-aist affeldt-aist merged commit 87c4e66 into math-comp:master Sep 13, 2025
66 of 67 checks passed
hoheinzollern pushed a commit to hoheinzollern/analysis that referenced this pull request Sep 22, 2025
Co-authored-by: Marie Kerjean <[email protected]>
Co-authored-by: Reynald Affeldt <[email protected]>
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants