-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 5
chore: add TODO t062 to research vercel-labs/agent-skills #88
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Conversation
Add backlog item to evaluate Vercel's Agent Skills collection for potential inclusion in aidevops. The repo includes vercel-deploy skill for instant deployment without auth, follows agentskills.io format.
Summary of ChangesHello @marcusquinn, I'm Gemini Code Assist1! I'm currently reviewing this pull request and will post my feedback shortly. In the meantime, here's a summary to help you and other reviewers quickly get up to speed! This pull request introduces a new research task into the project's backlog, aiming to explore the Highlights
Using Gemini Code AssistThe full guide for Gemini Code Assist can be found on our documentation page, here are some quick tips. Invoking Gemini You can request assistance from Gemini at any point by creating a comment using either
Customization To customize Gemini Code Assist for GitHub experience, repository maintainers can create a configuration file and/or provide a custom code review style guide (such as PEP-8 for Python) by creating and adding files to a Limitations & Feedback Gemini Code Assist may make mistakes. Please leave feedback on any instances where its feedback is incorrect or counter productive. You can react with 👍 and 👎 on @gemini-code-assist comments. If you're interested in giving your feedback about your experience with Gemini Code Assist for Github and other Google products, sign up here. You can also get AI-powered code generation, chat, as well as code reviews directly in the IDE at no cost with the Gemini Code Assist IDE Extension. Footnotes
|
WalkthroughA new backlog item t062 was added to TODO.md documenting research into vercel-labs/agent-skills for potential inclusion in the aidevops framework. The task is tagged with research, tools, and deployment. Total task count incremented from 55 to 56, with pending count updated from 44 to 45. Changes
Estimated code review effort🎯 1 (Trivial) | ⏱️ ~2 minutes Poem
🚥 Pre-merge checks | ✅ 3✅ Passed checks (3 passed)
✏️ Tip: You can configure your own custom pre-merge checks in the settings. 📜 Recent review detailsConfiguration used: Path: .coderabbit.yaml Review profile: CHILL Plan: Pro 📒 Files selected for processing (1)
🧰 Additional context used📓 Path-based instructions (1)**/*.md📄 CodeRabbit inference engine (AGENTS.md)
Files:
⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms. You can increase the timeout in your CodeRabbit configuration to a maximum of 15 minutes (900000ms). (3)
🔇 Additional comments (3)
✏️ Tip: You can disable this entire section by setting Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out. Comment |
🤖 Augment PR SummarySummary: Adds backlog item Changes:
🤖 Was this summary useful? React with 👍 or 👎 |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Review completed. No suggestions at this time.
Comment augment review to trigger a new review at any time.
|
🔍 Code Quality Report�[0;35m[MONITOR]�[0m Code Review Monitoring Report �[0;34m[INFO]�[0m Latest Quality Status: �[0;34m[INFO]�[0m Recent monitoring activity: 📈 Current Quality Metrics
Generated on: Wed Jan 14 15:37:29 UTC 2026 Generated by AI DevOps Framework Code Review Monitoring |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Code Review
This pull request adds a new task, t062, to the TODO.md file to track research into vercel-labs/agent-skills. The new task is added to the backlog in both human-readable and machine-readable formats, and the summary statistics are updated accordingly. The changes are straightforward and consistent with the file's structure. I've added one medium-severity comment regarding a pre-existing inconsistency in the summary data, suggesting a follow-up task to maintain the file's integrity. This does not need to be addressed in this PR.
|
|
||
| <!--TOON:summary{total,pending,in_progress,in_review,done,declined,total_est,total_actual,blocked_count,ready_count}: | ||
| 55,44,0,0,26,0,28d1h,16h50m,0,44 | ||
| 56,45,0,0,26,0,28d3h,16h50m,0,45 |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
While the summary values have been correctly incremented for the new task, I noticed some pre-existing inconsistencies in the file's data. For example, the done count in the summary is 26, but a manual count of completed tasks (including those in the Done section and [x]-marked tasks in the backlog) suggests a different number. This seems to be a pre-existing issue and is out of scope for this PR. It would be beneficial to create a new task to audit and correct the TOON blocks and summary to ensure data integrity for future tracking.



Summary
Evaluation Points
Reference
https://github.com/vercel-labs/agent-skills
Summary by CodeRabbit
✏️ Tip: You can customize this high-level summary in your review settings.