Skip to content

Conversation

@marcusquinn
Copy link
Owner

@marcusquinn marcusquinn commented Jan 14, 2026

Summary

  • Add backlog item t062 to research vercel-labs/agent-skills for potential inclusion in aidevops
  • Vercel's Agent Skills collection (332 stars, MIT) includes vercel-deploy skill for instant deployment without auth
  • Follows agentskills.io format (SKILL.md structure)

Evaluation Points

  1. Add vercel-deploy as aidevops skill
  2. Adopt Agent Skills format for aidevops skills
  3. Contribute aidevops skills back to ecosystem

Reference

https://github.com/vercel-labs/agent-skills

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • Chores
    • Updated project backlog with a new research task for upcoming evaluation.

✏️ Tip: You can customize this high-level summary in your review settings.

Add backlog item to evaluate Vercel's Agent Skills collection for
potential inclusion in aidevops. The repo includes vercel-deploy skill
for instant deployment without auth, follows agentskills.io format.
@gemini-code-assist
Copy link

Summary of Changes

Hello @marcusquinn, I'm Gemini Code Assist1! I'm currently reviewing this pull request and will post my feedback shortly. In the meantime, here's a summary to help you and other reviewers quickly get up to speed!

This pull request introduces a new research task into the project's backlog, aiming to explore the vercel-labs/agent-skills project. The primary goal is to evaluate the feasibility and benefits of integrating Vercel's agent skills, particularly vercel-deploy, into aidevops, while also considering the adoption of a standardized skill format and potential contributions to the open-source agent skills ecosystem.

Highlights

  • New Research Task Added: A new backlog item, t062, has been added to the TODO.md file. This task is focused on researching vercel-labs/agent-skills for potential integration into the aidevops project.
  • Evaluation Points Defined: The research task includes specific evaluation points: assessing the addition of vercel-deploy as an aidevops skill, considering the adoption of the Agent Skills format for aidevops skills, and exploring opportunities to contribute aidevops skills back to the ecosystem.
  • Backlog Statistics Updated: The summary statistics within TODO.md have been updated to reflect the addition of the new task, increasing the total and pending task counts, and adjusting the total estimated time.
Using Gemini Code Assist

The full guide for Gemini Code Assist can be found on our documentation page, here are some quick tips.

Invoking Gemini

You can request assistance from Gemini at any point by creating a comment using either /gemini <command> or @gemini-code-assist <command>. Below is a summary of the supported commands on the current page.

Feature Command Description
Code Review /gemini review Performs a code review for the current pull request in its current state.
Pull Request Summary /gemini summary Provides a summary of the current pull request in its current state.
Comment @gemini-code-assist Responds in comments when explicitly tagged, both in pull request comments and review comments.
Help /gemini help Displays a list of available commands.

Customization

To customize Gemini Code Assist for GitHub experience, repository maintainers can create a configuration file and/or provide a custom code review style guide (such as PEP-8 for Python) by creating and adding files to a .gemini/ folder in the base of the repository. Detailed instructions can be found here.

Limitations & Feedback

Gemini Code Assist may make mistakes. Please leave feedback on any instances where its feedback is incorrect or counter productive. You can react with 👍 and 👎 on @gemini-code-assist comments. If you're interested in giving your feedback about your experience with Gemini Code Assist for Github and other Google products, sign up here.

You can also get AI-powered code generation, chat, as well as code reviews directly in the IDE at no cost with the Gemini Code Assist IDE Extension.

Footnotes

  1. Review the Privacy Notices, Generative AI Prohibited Use Policy, Terms of Service, and learn how to configure Gemini Code Assist in GitHub here. Gemini can make mistakes, so double check it and use code with caution.

@coderabbitai
Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented Jan 14, 2026

Walkthrough

A new backlog item t062 was added to TODO.md documenting research into vercel-labs/agent-skills for potential inclusion in the aidevops framework. The task is tagged with research, tools, and deployment. Total task count incremented from 55 to 56, with pending count updated from 44 to 45.

Changes

Cohort / File(s) Change Summary
Backlog Task Addition
TODO.md
Added new backlog item t062 for researching vercel-labs/agent-skills with tags (research, tools, deployment). Updated summary block task counters: total 55→56, pending 44→45.

Estimated code review effort

🎯 1 (Trivial) | ⏱️ ~2 minutes

Poem

📋 New skill upon the horizon bright,
Vercel's tools caught in DevOps sight,
t062 joins the queue with care,
Research awaits, innovation in the air! ✨

🚥 Pre-merge checks | ✅ 3
✅ Passed checks (3 passed)
Check name Status Explanation
Description Check ✅ Passed Check skipped - CodeRabbit’s high-level summary is enabled.
Title check ✅ Passed The title accurately describes the primary change: adding a new TODO backlog item (t062) to research vercel-labs/agent-skills, which is clearly reflected in the changeset.
Docstring Coverage ✅ Passed No functions found in the changed files to evaluate docstring coverage. Skipping docstring coverage check.

✏️ Tip: You can configure your own custom pre-merge checks in the settings.



📜 Recent review details

Configuration used: Path: .coderabbit.yaml

Review profile: CHILL

Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 2b74f5d and 1c29f06.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • TODO.md
🧰 Additional context used
📓 Path-based instructions (1)
**/*.md

📄 CodeRabbit inference engine (AGENTS.md)

Use placeholders in examples and note secure storage location in documentation

Files:

  • TODO.md
⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms. You can increase the timeout in your CodeRabbit configuration to a maximum of 15 minutes (900000ms). (3)
  • GitHub Check: Audit Log
  • GitHub Check: Security Block Notification
  • GitHub Check: Codacy Static Code Analysis
🔇 Additional comments (3)
TODO.md (3)

136-137: Well-documented research task with clear evaluation criteria.

The task entry is properly formatted with appropriate tags, time estimates, and comprehensive notes. The three evaluation points provide a clear roadmap for the research outcome.


194-194: TOON metadata correctly formatted.

The machine-readable metadata entry accurately reflects the task attributes with proper field ordering and ISO 8601 timestamp.


281-281: Summary counts correctly updated.

The total task count (55→56) and pending count (44→45) accurately reflect the addition of task t062 to the backlog.

✏️ Tip: You can disable this entire section by setting review_details to false in your review settings.


Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share

Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands and usage tips.

@augmentcode
Copy link

augmentcode bot commented Jan 14, 2026

🤖 Augment PR Summary

Summary: Adds backlog item t062 to evaluate Vercel’s vercel-labs/agent-skills as potential input for aidevops.

Changes:

  • Appended t062 to the task list with evaluation notes and reference link
  • Added t062 to the TOON backlog table and updated the TOON summary counts

🤖 Was this summary useful? React with 👍 or 👎

Copy link

@augmentcode augmentcode bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Review completed. No suggestions at this time.

Comment augment review to trigger a new review at any time.

@sonarqubecloud
Copy link

@github-actions
Copy link

🔍 Code Quality Report

�[0;35m[MONITOR]�[0m Code Review Monitoring Report

�[0;34m[INFO]�[0m Latest Quality Status:
SonarCloud: 0 bugs, 0 vulnerabilities, 260 code smells

�[0;34m[INFO]�[0m Recent monitoring activity:
Wed Jan 14 15:36:47 UTC 2026: Code review monitoring started
Wed Jan 14 15:36:48 UTC 2026: SonarCloud - Bugs: 0, Vulnerabilities: 0, Code Smells: 260
Wed Jan 14 15:36:48 UTC 2026: Qlty - 0 issues found, auto-formatting applied
Wed Jan 14 15:36:50 UTC 2026: Codacy analysis completed with auto-fixes

📈 Current Quality Metrics

  • BUGS: 0
  • CODE SMELLS: 260
  • VULNERABILITIES: 0

Generated on: Wed Jan 14 15:37:29 UTC 2026


Generated by AI DevOps Framework Code Review Monitoring

Copy link

@gemini-code-assist gemini-code-assist bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Code Review

This pull request adds a new task, t062, to the TODO.md file to track research into vercel-labs/agent-skills. The new task is added to the backlog in both human-readable and machine-readable formats, and the summary statistics are updated accordingly. The changes are straightforward and consistent with the file's structure. I've added one medium-severity comment regarding a pre-existing inconsistency in the summary data, suggesting a follow-up task to maintain the file's integrity. This does not need to be addressed in this PR.


<!--TOON:summary{total,pending,in_progress,in_review,done,declined,total_est,total_actual,blocked_count,ready_count}:
55,44,0,0,26,0,28d1h,16h50m,0,44
56,45,0,0,26,0,28d3h,16h50m,0,45

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

medium

While the summary values have been correctly incremented for the new task, I noticed some pre-existing inconsistencies in the file's data. For example, the done count in the summary is 26, but a manual count of completed tasks (including those in the Done section and [x]-marked tasks in the backlog) suggests a different number. This seems to be a pre-existing issue and is out of scope for this PR. It would be beneficial to create a new task to audit and correct the TOON blocks and summary to ensure data integrity for future tracking.

@marcusquinn marcusquinn merged commit ca343a2 into main Jan 14, 2026
11 of 13 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant