Skip to content

Conversation

@marcusquinn
Copy link
Owner

Summary

PR #403 Thread Triage (12 threads)

Issue Severity Resolution
transcribe command documented but not implemented High Removed in PR #447
nltk.download stderr suppressed Medium Fixed: stdout suppressed, stderr visible
cmd_stop fixed sleep 2 Medium Fixed: polling loop (5s, 0.5s intervals)
cmd_status suppresses detect_gpu stderr Medium Fixed: no suppression
shift 2>/dev/null || true obscure Medium Fixed: explicit if/shift
PyTorch version 2.10+ typo Medium Fixed: corrected to 2.4+
CPU fallback to CUDA Major Fixed: defaults to --server with warning
Docker guard missing in cmd_stop Minor Fixed: command -v docker guard
Concrete IP in help examples Minor Fixed: <server-ip> placeholder
API key storage guidance missing Minor Fixed: added to docs
transcribe command (CodeRabbit) Minor Fixed: removed from docs
README Voice section verbose Minor Dismissed: already condensed

ShellCheck: zero violations.

Closes #445

@coderabbitai
Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented Feb 7, 2026

Warning

Rate limit exceeded

@marcusquinn has exceeded the limit for the number of commits that can be reviewed per hour. Please wait 9 minutes and 29 seconds before requesting another review.

⌛ How to resolve this issue?

After the wait time has elapsed, a review can be triggered using the @coderabbitai review command as a PR comment. Alternatively, push new commits to this PR.

We recommend that you space out your commits to avoid hitting the rate limit.

🚦 How do rate limits work?

CodeRabbit enforces hourly rate limits for each developer per organization.

Our paid plans have higher rate limits than the trial, open-source and free plans. In all cases, we re-allow further reviews after a brief timeout.

Please see our FAQ for further information.

✨ Finishing touches
🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)
  • Create PR with unit tests
  • Post copyable unit tests in a comment
  • Commit unit tests in branch feature/t141

Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share

Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands and usage tips.

@gemini-code-assist
Copy link

Summary of Changes

Hello @marcusquinn, I'm Gemini Code Assist1! I'm currently reviewing this pull request and will post my feedback shortly. In the meantime, here's a summary to help you and other reviewers quickly get up to speed!

This pull request focuses on administrative tasks related to project management and code review resolution. It updates the TODO.md file to reflect the completion of specific tasks, primarily the comprehensive resolution of all outstanding review threads from a significant prior pull request (#403), ensuring that identified issues have been addressed and documented.

Highlights

Changelog
Activity
Using Gemini Code Assist

The full guide for Gemini Code Assist can be found on our documentation page, here are some quick tips.

Invoking Gemini

You can request assistance from Gemini at any point by creating a comment using either /gemini <command> or @gemini-code-assist <command>. Below is a summary of the supported commands on the current page.

Feature Command Description
Code Review /gemini review Performs a code review for the current pull request in its current state.
Pull Request Summary /gemini summary Provides a summary of the current pull request in its current state.
Comment @gemini-code-assist Responds in comments when explicitly tagged, both in pull request comments and review comments.
Help /gemini help Displays a list of available commands.

Customization

To customize Gemini Code Assist for GitHub experience, repository maintainers can create a configuration file and/or provide a custom code review style guide (such as PEP-8 for Python) by creating and adding files to a .gemini/ folder in the base of the repository. Detailed instructions can be found here.

Limitations & Feedback

Gemini Code Assist may make mistakes. Please leave feedback on any instances where its feedback is incorrect or counter productive. You can react with 👍 and 👎 on @gemini-code-assist comments. If you're interested in giving your feedback about your experience with Gemini Code Assist for Github and other Google products, sign up here.

You can also get AI-powered code generation, chat, as well as code reviews directly in the IDE at no cost with the Gemini Code Assist IDE Extension.

Footnotes

  1. Review the Privacy Notices, Generative AI Prohibited Use Policy, Terms of Service, and learn how to configure Gemini Code Assist in GitHub here. Gemini can make mistakes, so double check it and use code with caution.

@github-actions
Copy link

github-actions bot commented Feb 7, 2026

🔍 Code Quality Report

�[0;35m[MONITOR]�[0m Code Review Monitoring Report

�[0;34m[INFO]�[0m Latest Quality Status:
SonarCloud: 0 bugs, 0 vulnerabilities, 28 code smells

�[0;34m[INFO]�[0m Recent monitoring activity:
Sat Feb 7 20:21:29 UTC 2026: Code review monitoring started
Sat Feb 7 20:21:30 UTC 2026: SonarCloud - Bugs: 0, Vulnerabilities: 0, Code Smells: 28
Sat Feb 7 20:21:30 UTC 2026: Qlty - 0 issues found, auto-formatting applied
Sat Feb 7 20:21:32 UTC 2026: Codacy analysis completed with auto-fixes

📈 Current Quality Metrics

  • BUGS: 0
  • CODE SMELLS: 28
  • VULNERABILITIES: 0

Generated on: Sat Feb 7 20:21:32 UTC 2026


Generated by AI DevOps Framework Code Review Monitoring

@sonarqubecloud
Copy link

sonarqubecloud bot commented Feb 7, 2026

Copy link

@gemini-code-assist gemini-code-assist bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Code Review

This pull request updates the TODO.md file to mark tasks t141 and t147.6 as complete. The changes accurately reflect the resolution of all review threads from PR #403, as detailed in the pull request description. The updates to the task list and associated notes are clear and follow the established format in the TODO.md file. The changes are correct and no issues were found.

@marcusquinn
Copy link
Owner Author

Closing: TODO.md changes conflict with main (already updated). t141/t147.6 status tracked on main.

@marcusquinn marcusquinn closed this Feb 7, 2026
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

t141: bug: speech-to-speech-helper.sh documents commands that don't exist

1 participant