chore: mark t146 complete - no_pr retry bug already fixed by t147.1 (#450)

[marcusquinn]

Summary

• Marks t146 as complete in TODO.md - the bug (missing $SUPERVISOR_DB arg in db() calls for no_pr retry counter) was already fixed by t147.1 (PR fix(supervisor): add missing $SUPERVISOR_DB arg, remove PATH guard (t147.1) #450, commit 3430dcb)
• Verified all 117 db() calls in supervisor-helper.sh correctly pass $SUPERVISOR_DB
• No code changes needed; TODO-only update

Verification

All three issues from the original CodeRabbit review on PR #435 were addressed by t147.1:

1. $SUPERVISOR_DB added to db() SELECT call (line ~3483)
2. $SUPERVISOR_DB added to db() UPDATE call (line ~3501)
3. Unused no_pr_key variable removed

Refs: GH#439, t146

Summary by CodeRabbit

• Bug Fixes
  • Resolved a retry counter issue where database configuration was not being properly applied across all database operations. Database settings are now consistently passed throughout the application.

[gemini-code-assist]

Summary of Changes

Hello @marcusquinn, I'm Gemini Code Assist¹! I'm currently reviewing this pull request and will post my feedback shortly. In the meantime, here's a summary to help you and other reviewers quickly get up to speed!

This pull request serves to update the project's TODO.md file by marking task t146 as complete. The underlying bug, which concerned a non-functional no_pr retry counter in the supervisor due to missing database arguments, was already addressed and fixed in a prior pull request (t147.1). This PR confirms the resolution and updates the task's status accordingly, without introducing any new code modifications.

Highlights

• Task Completion: Task t146, concerning a non-functional supervisor no_pr retry counter, has been marked as complete in TODO.md.
• Bug Resolution: The bug described in t146 was previously resolved by t147.1 (PR fix(supervisor): add missing $SUPERVISOR_DB arg, remove PATH guard (t147.1) #450, commit 3430dcb), which addressed missing $SUPERVISOR_DB arguments in db() calls and removed an unused no_pr_key variable.
• Verification: All 117 db() calls in supervisor-helper.sh were verified to correctly pass $SUPERVISOR_DB, confirming the bug's resolution.
• Code Changes: This pull request contains no functional code changes; it is solely a documentation update to reflect the bug's prior fix.

Changelog

• TODO.md
  • Updated the status of task t146 from pending to complete.
  • Revised the notes for t146 to indicate that the bug was fixed by t147.1 (PR fix(supervisor): add missing $SUPERVISOR_DB arg, remove PATH guard (t147.1) #450) and that all db() calls were verified.
  • Updated the 'actual' and 'ai' time estimates for t146 to '0m' and added a 'completed' date.

Activity

• The pull request marks task t146 as complete, acknowledging that the bug it described was already fixed in a previous PR (t147.1, PR fix(supervisor): add missing $SUPERVISOR_DB arg, remove PATH guard (t147.1) #450).
• Verification steps were performed to confirm the bug's resolution by checking db() calls in supervisor-helper.sh.
• This PR is a follow-up to ensure documentation reflects the current state of bug fixes.

Using Gemini Code Assist

The full guide for Gemini Code Assist can be found on our documentation page, here are some quick tips.

Invoking Gemini

You can request assistance from Gemini at any point by creating a comment using either /gemini <command> or @gemini-code-assist <command>. Below is a summary of the supported commands on the current page.

Feature	Command	Description
Code Review	/gemini review	Performs a code review for the current pull request in its current state.
Pull Request Summary	/gemini summary	Provides a summary of the current pull request in its current state.
Comment	@gemini-code-assist	Responds in comments when explicitly tagged, both in pull request comments and review comments.
Help	/gemini help	Displays a list of available commands.

Customization

To customize Gemini Code Assist for GitHub experience, repository maintainers can create a configuration file and/or provide a custom code review style guide (such as PEP-8 for Python) by creating and adding files to a .gemini/ folder in the base of the repository. Detailed instructions can be found here.

Limitations & Feedback

Gemini Code Assist may make mistakes. Please leave feedback on any instances where its feedback is incorrect or counter productive. You can react with 👍 and 👎 on @gemini-code-assist comments. If you're interested in giving your feedback about your experience with Gemini Code Assist for Github and other Google products, sign up here.

You can also get AI-powered code generation, chat, as well as code reviews directly in the IDE at no cost with the Gemini Code Assist IDE Extension.

Footnotes

1. Review the Privacy Notices, Generative AI Prohibited Use Policy, Terms of Service, and learn how to configure Gemini Code Assist in GitHub here. Gemini can make mistakes, so double check it and use code with caution. ↩

[coderabbitai]

Walkthrough

Task tracking update marking task t146 as completed. The task tracked a bug where $SUPERVISOR_DB was missing from db() calls in supervisor-helper.sh. The actual fix was implemented in PR #450, now documented with completion metadata and verification notes.

Changes

Cohort / File(s)	Summary
Task Tracking TODO.md	Marked t146 task as completed with actual effort (0m) and ai estimate (0m). Added completion notes referencing PR #450 (t147.1) and verification details that both affected db() calls now pass $SUPERVISOR_DB argument; 117 total db() calls pass the variable.

Estimated code review effort

🎯 1 (Trivial) | ⏱️ ~2 minutes

Possibly related issues

• t146: bug: supervisor no_pr retry counter non-functional (missing $SUPERVISOR_DB) #439: This PR documents completion of the supervisor-helper.sh bug (missing $SUPERVISOR_DB argument to db() calls) that was the subject of the reported issue and fixed in PR #450.

Poem

🎯 Task t146 now sealed tight,
Supervisor bug banished from sight,
$SUPERVISOR_DB flows where it should,
One-seventeen calls, all good! ✨

🚥 Pre-merge checks | ✅ 3

✅ Passed checks (3 passed)

Check name	Status	Explanation
Description Check	✅ Passed	Check skipped - CodeRabbit’s high-level summary is enabled.
Title check	✅ Passed	The title accurately describes the main change: marking task t146 as complete in TODO.md with a reference to the related PR #450 that fixed the underlying issue.
Docstring Coverage	✅ Passed	No functions found in the changed files to evaluate docstring coverage. Skipping docstring coverage check.

_{✏️ Tip: You can configure your own custom pre-merge checks in the settings.}

✨ Finishing touches

🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)

• Create PR with unit tests
• Post copyable unit tests in a comment
• Commit unit tests in branch feature/t146

---

No actionable comments were generated in the recent review. 🎉

---

Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share

• X
• Mastodon
• Reddit
• LinkedIn

_{Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands and usage tips.}

[github-actions]

🔍 Code Quality Report

�[0;35m[MONITOR]�[0m Code Review Monitoring Report

�[0;34m[INFO]�[0m Latest Quality Status:
SonarCloud: 0 bugs, 0 vulnerabilities, 28 code smells

�[0;34m[INFO]�[0m Recent monitoring activity:
Sat Feb 7 20:20:03 UTC 2026: Code review monitoring started
Sat Feb 7 20:20:04 UTC 2026: SonarCloud - Bugs: 0, Vulnerabilities: 0, Code Smells: 28
Sat Feb 7 20:20:04 UTC 2026: Qlty - 0 issues found, auto-formatting applied
Sat Feb 7 20:20:06 UTC 2026: Codacy analysis completed with auto-fixes

📈 Current Quality Metrics

• BUGS: 0
• CODE SMELLS: 28
• VULNERABILITIES: 0

Generated on: Sat Feb 7 20:20:06 UTC 2026

---

Generated by AI DevOps Framework Code Review Monitoring

[sonarqubecloud]

Quality Gate passed

Issues
0 New issues
0 Accepted issues

Measures
0 Security Hotspots
0.0% Coverage on New Code
0.0% Duplication on New Code

See analysis details on SonarQube Cloud

[gemini-code-assist]

Code Review

This pull request updates the TODO.md file to mark task t146 as complete. The change reflects that the associated bug was already addressed in a previous pull request. This is a documentation-only update to keep the project's task list accurate. The change is correct and I have no further feedback.

[marcusquinn]

Closing: TODO.md changes conflict with main (already updated). t146 was already fixed by t147.1.