docs: update README with recent feature changes#420
Conversation
- Remove dataforseo and outscraper from MCP table (replaced by curl subagents) - Update MCP count badge from 19 to 17 - Update script count to 172, subagent count to 765+ - Fix inconsistent script count (was 167 in one place, 146 in another) - Update supported AI assistants to reflect OpenCode-only support (PR #412) - Add three-tier agent lifecycle section (draft/custom/shared from PR #409) - Move outscraper to curl subagents section
|
Warning Rate limit exceeded
⌛ How to resolve this issue?After the wait time has elapsed, a review can be triggered using the We recommend that you space out your commits to avoid hitting the rate limit. 🚦 How do rate limits work?CodeRabbit enforces hourly rate limits for each developer per organization. Our paid plans have higher rate limits than the trial, open-source and free plans. In all cases, we re-allow further reviews after a brief timeout. Please see our FAQ for further information. ✨ Finishing touches🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)
Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out. Comment |
Summary of ChangesHello @marcusquinn, I'm Gemini Code Assist1! I'm currently reviewing this pull request and will post my feedback shortly. In the meantime, here's a summary to help you and other reviewers quickly get up to speed! This pull request updates the Highlights
Changelog
Activity
Using Gemini Code AssistThe full guide for Gemini Code Assist can be found on our documentation page, here are some quick tips. Invoking Gemini You can request assistance from Gemini at any point by creating a comment using either
Customization To customize Gemini Code Assist for GitHub experience, repository maintainers can create a configuration file and/or provide a custom code review style guide (such as PEP-8 for Python) by creating and adding files to a Limitations & Feedback Gemini Code Assist may make mistakes. Please leave feedback on any instances where its feedback is incorrect or counter productive. You can react with 👍 and 👎 on @gemini-code-assist comments. If you're interested in giving your feedback about your experience with Gemini Code Assist for Github and other Google products, sign up here. You can also get AI-powered code generation, chat, as well as code reviews directly in the IDE at no cost with the Gemini Code Assist IDE Extension. Footnotes
|
🔍 Code Quality Report�[0;35m[MONITOR]�[0m Code Review Monitoring Report �[0;34m[INFO]�[0m Latest Quality Status: �[0;34m[INFO]�[0m Recent monitoring activity: 📈 Current Quality Metrics
Generated on: Sat Feb 7 04:42:16 UTC 2026 Generated by AI DevOps Framework Code Review Monitoring |
![gemini-code-assist[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/956858?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Code Review
This pull request updates the README file to reflect recent changes in the project, such as updated agent and script counts, removal of certain MCPs, and a new section on the agent lifecycle. The changes are well-described and mostly accurate. I've found one inconsistency regarding the MCP count which should be addressed to ensure the documentation is correct.
README.md
Outdated
| [](https://agents.md/) | ||
| [](https://github.com/marcusquinn/aidevops/blob/main/AGENTS.md) | ||
| [](#mcp-integrations) | ||
| [](#mcp-integrations) |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
The MCP server count in the badge is updated to 17, and the section header at line 890 is also updated to '17 active'. However, after removing Outscraper, the list of supported MCPs from line 896 to 913 contains 18 entries. This seems to be a discrepancy. Could you please verify the count and update either the badge/header or the table to be consistent?
🔍 Code Quality Report�[0;35m[MONITOR]�[0m Code Review Monitoring Report �[0;34m[INFO]�[0m Latest Quality Status: �[0;34m[INFO]�[0m Recent monitoring activity: 📈 Current Quality Metrics
Generated on: Sat Feb 7 04:45:40 UTC 2026 Generated by AI DevOps Framework Code Review Monitoring |
|
1 participant
Summary