t1436: keep pulse focused on dispatch#4131
Conversation
Clarify the supervisor boundary so pulse sessions dispatch workers and coordinate queue state instead of drifting into direct repo implementation work. This preserves the fresh-cycle launchd model and prevents one pulse process from holding the queue hostage by acting like a worker.
|
Warning You have reached your daily quota limit. Please wait up to 24 hours and I will start processing your requests again! |
|
Warning Rate limit exceeded
⌛ How to resolve this issue?After the wait time has elapsed, a review can be triggered using the We recommend that you space out your commits to avoid hitting the rate limit. 🚦 How do rate limits work?CodeRabbit enforces hourly rate limits for each developer per organization. Our paid plans have higher rate limits than the trial, open-source and free plans. In all cases, we re-allow further reviews after a brief timeout. Please see our FAQ for further information. ℹ️ Review info⚙️ Run configurationConfiguration used: Path: .coderabbit.yaml Review profile: CHILL Plan: Pro Run ID: 📒 Files selected for processing (1)
WalkthroughThis PR adds a mandatory supervisor boundary section to Changes
Estimated code review effort🎯 1 (Trivial) | ⏱️ ~2 minutes Possibly related PRs
Suggested labels
Poem
🚥 Pre-merge checks | ✅ 5✅ Passed checks (5 passed)
✏️ Tip: You can configure your own custom pre-merge checks in the settings. ✨ Finishing Touches🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)
Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out. Comment |
🔍 Code Quality Report�[0;35m[MONITOR]�[0m Code Review Monitoring Report �[0;34m[INFO]�[0m Latest Quality Status: �[0;34m[INFO]�[0m Recent monitoring activity: 📈 Current Quality Metrics
Generated on: Wed Mar 11 05:18:52 UTC 2026 Generated by AI DevOps Framework Code Review Monitoring |
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 1
🤖 Prompt for all review comments with AI agents
Verify each finding against the current code and only fix it if needed.
Inline comments:
In @.agents/scripts/commands/pulse.md:
- Line 13: The "Supervisor boundary (MANDATORY)" rule conflicts with later steps
that instruct committing TODO.md and mission state changes locally; update the
document so both sections use the same model: either (A) keep the strict
no-repo-mutations rule in the "Supervisor boundary (MANDATORY)" header and
change all later steps that mention committing or editing files (e.g., the steps
that reference committing TODO.md and mission state changes) to instead dispatch
a worker via the headless helper (opencode run) for any code/worktree changes,
or (B) relax the boundary to permit supervisor-local commits and explicitly
remove the “NEVER edit files” line and add safe-local-edit guidance; ensure you
update the "Supervisor boundary (MANDATORY)" paragraph and every later reference
to committing TODO.md/mission state so they consistently follow the chosen
model.
ℹ️ Review info
⚙️ Run configuration
Configuration used: Path: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
Run ID: 070dd157-6dc0-4e88-91a2-db38556e36a5
📒 Files selected for processing (1)
.agents/scripts/commands/pulse.md
Keep the supervisor boundary strict for source-code implementation while explicitly allowing the coordination-file updates the pulse already owns. This removes the prompt conflict that let the supervisor drift into worker behavior without blocking TODO sync and mission state transitions.
🔍 Code Quality Report�[0;35m[MONITOR]�[0m Code Review Monitoring Report �[0;34m[INFO]�[0m Latest Quality Status: �[0;34m[INFO]�[0m Recent monitoring activity: 📈 Current Quality Metrics
Generated on: Wed Mar 11 05:22:17 UTC 2026 Generated by AI DevOps Framework Code Review Monitoring |
|
1 participant
Summary
Closes #4130
Summary by CodeRabbit