Skip to content

chore: add t120 review @thymikee post for aidevops#339

Merged
marcusquinn merged 1 commit intomainfrom
chore/add-todo-t120
Feb 5, 2026
Merged

chore: add t120 review @thymikee post for aidevops#339
marcusquinn merged 1 commit intomainfrom
chore/add-todo-t120

Conversation

@marcusquinn
Copy link
Owner

@marcusquinn marcusquinn commented Feb 5, 2026

Summary

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • Documentation
    • Updated internal backlog entries.

⚠️ Note: This pull request contains unresolved merge conflicts that require resolution before release.

@gemini-code-assist
Copy link

Summary of Changes

Hello @marcusquinn, I'm Gemini Code Assist1! I'm currently reviewing this pull request and will post my feedback shortly. In the meantime, here's a summary to help you and other reviewers quickly get up to speed!

This pull request updates the project's TODO.md file by incorporating a new research item. The purpose of this addition is to evaluate external content for its applicability and integration into the aidevops initiative, ensuring the project stays current with relevant developments and ideas.

Highlights

  • New Task Added: A new task, t120, has been added to the TODO.md file, focusing on research and tools.
  • Research Focus: The task involves reviewing a post by @thymikee on X (formerly Twitter) to assess its potential relevance and inclusion for aidevops.
  • Estimated Effort: The new task is estimated to take approximately 15 minutes, broken down into 10 minutes for AI-related work and 5 minutes for reading.
Changelog
  • TODO.md
    • Added a new task t120 to review a post by @thymikee for aidevops inclusion, categorized under research and tools.
Activity
  • The pull request was opened by marcusquinn with the title 'chore: add t120 review @thymikee post for aidevops'.
  • The PR description provides a summary of the change and a reference link to the X post.
Using Gemini Code Assist

The full guide for Gemini Code Assist can be found on our documentation page, here are some quick tips.

Invoking Gemini

You can request assistance from Gemini at any point by creating a comment using either /gemini <command> or @gemini-code-assist <command>. Below is a summary of the supported commands on the current page.

Feature Command Description
Code Review /gemini review Performs a code review for the current pull request in its current state.
Pull Request Summary /gemini summary Provides a summary of the current pull request in its current state.
Comment @gemini-code-assist Responds in comments when explicitly tagged, both in pull request comments and review comments.
Help /gemini help Displays a list of available commands.

Customization

To customize Gemini Code Assist for GitHub experience, repository maintainers can create a configuration file and/or provide a custom code review style guide (such as PEP-8 for Python) by creating and adding files to a .gemini/ folder in the base of the repository. Detailed instructions can be found here.

Limitations & Feedback

Gemini Code Assist may make mistakes. Please leave feedback on any instances where its feedback is incorrect or counter productive. You can react with 👍 and 👎 on @gemini-code-assist comments. If you're interested in giving your feedback about your experience with Gemini Code Assist for Github and other Google products, sign up here.

You can also get AI-powered code generation, chat, as well as code reviews directly in the IDE at no cost with the Gemini Code Assist IDE Extension.

Footnotes

  1. Review the Privacy Notices, Generative AI Prohibited Use Policy, Terms of Service, and learn how to configure Gemini Code Assist in GitHub here. Gemini can make mistakes, so double check it and use code with caution.

@coderabbitai
Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented Feb 5, 2026

Caution

Review failed

The pull request is closed.

Walkthrough

TODO.md file contains a new backlog item (t120) referencing a post review for AI DevOps inclusion. The diff includes unresolved merge conflict markers between HEAD and origin/main branches, requiring manual conflict resolution before merging.

Changes

Cohort / File(s) Summary
Backlog Management
TODO.md
Added new backlog item t120. Merge conflict markers present between HEAD and origin/main requiring resolution of conflicting backlog entries.

Estimated code review effort

🎯 2 (Simple) | ⏱️ ~8 minutes

Poem

📋 A todo list grows with new goals in sight,
But conflict markers blur the light—
t120 awaits its rightful place,
Once merge conflicts face their fate with grace.

✨ Finishing touches
🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)
  • Create PR with unit tests
  • Post copyable unit tests in a comment
  • Commit unit tests in branch chore/add-todo-t120

Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share

Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands and usage tips.

@github-actions
Copy link

github-actions bot commented Feb 5, 2026

🔍 Code Quality Report

�[0;35m[MONITOR]�[0m Code Review Monitoring Report

�[0;34m[INFO]�[0m Latest Quality Status:
SonarCloud: 0 bugs, 0 vulnerabilities, 2 code smells

�[0;34m[INFO]�[0m Recent monitoring activity:
Thu Feb 5 04:57:36 UTC 2026: Code review monitoring started
Thu Feb 5 04:57:37 UTC 2026: SonarCloud - Bugs: 0, Vulnerabilities: 0, Code Smells: 2
Thu Feb 5 04:57:37 UTC 2026: Qlty - 0 issues found, auto-formatting applied
Thu Feb 5 04:57:39 UTC 2026: Codacy analysis completed with auto-fixes

📈 Current Quality Metrics

  • BUGS: 0
  • CODE SMELLS: 2
  • VULNERABILITIES: 0

Generated on: Thu Feb 5 04:57:42 UTC 2026


Generated by AI DevOps Framework Code Review Monitoring

@sonarqubecloud
Copy link

sonarqubecloud bot commented Feb 5, 2026

@marcusquinn marcusquinn merged commit c1dd478 into main Feb 5, 2026
10 of 11 checks passed
Copy link

@gemini-code-assist gemini-code-assist bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Code Review

This pull request introduces a new task, t120, to the project's TODO.md file. The task involves reviewing a post by @thymikee for potential inclusion in the aidevops framework. The change is a simple addition to the backlog, and it adheres to the established formatting conventions for tasks within the document. The new entry is correctly indented and placed within the backlog section. My review of this change finds it to be correct and well-formed, with no issues to report.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant