fix: resolve postflight ShellCheck and return statement issues #30
Conversation
- Remove erroneous 'return 0' after main in 3 scripts (fix-s131-default-cases, generate-skills, gsc-add-user-helper) - Add missing 'return 0' in main() for 3 scripts (ralph-upstream-check, terminal-title-setup, todo-ready) - Remove unused HELPER_SCRIPT variable (SC2034) in terminal-title-setup.sh - Replace 'ls -la' with 'find -exec ls -ld' (SC2012) in dev-browser-helper.sh
WalkthroughShell script maintenance across the DevOps automation framework, focusing on exit status consistency. Changes include adding explicit return statements in main functions, removing trailing returns, optimizing profile listing output, and cleaning up unused variables with clarifying comments. Changes
Estimated code review effort🎯 2 (Simple) | ⏱️ ~8 minutes Possibly related PRs
Poem
🚥 Pre-merge checks | ✅ 3✅ Passed checks (3 passed)
✏️ Tip: You can configure your own custom pre-merge checks in the settings. ✨ Finishing touches
📜 Recent review detailsConfiguration used: Path: .coderabbit.yaml Review profile: CHILL Plan: Pro 📒 Files selected for processing (7)
💤 Files with no reviewable changes (3)
🧰 Additional context used📓 Path-based instructions (1).agent/scripts/*.sh⚙️ CodeRabbit configuration file
Files:
🧠 Learnings (2)📓 Common learnings📚 Learning: 2026-01-06T15:57:56.007ZApplied to files:
⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms. You can increase the timeout in your CodeRabbit configuration to a maximum of 15 minutes (900000ms). (1)
🔇 Additional comments (4)
Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out. Comment |
Summary of ChangesHello @marcusquinn, I'm Gemini Code Assist1! I'm currently reviewing this pull request and will post my feedback shortly. In the meantime, here's a summary to help you and other reviewers quickly get up to speed! This pull request focuses on improving the robustness and compliance of several shell scripts by addressing various ShellCheck warnings and standardizing return statement practices. The changes ensure cleaner code, prevent potential issues related to script exit statuses, and enhance the reliability of directory listing operations. Highlights
Using Gemini Code AssistThe full guide for Gemini Code Assist can be found on our documentation page, here are some quick tips. Invoking Gemini You can request assistance from Gemini at any point by creating a comment using either
Customization To customize Gemini Code Assist for GitHub experience, repository maintainers can create a configuration file and/or provide a custom code review style guide (such as PEP-8 for Python) by creating and adding files to a Limitations & Feedback Gemini Code Assist may make mistakes. Please leave feedback on any instances where its feedback is incorrect or counter productive. You can react with 👍 and 👎 on @gemini-code-assist comments. If you're interested in giving your feedback about your experience with Gemini Code Assist for Github and other Google products, sign up here. You can also get AI-powered code generation, chat, as well as code reviews directly in the IDE at no cost with the Gemini Code Assist IDE Extension. Footnotes
|
🔍 Code Quality Report�[0;35m[MONITOR]�[0m Code Review Monitoring Report �[0;34m[INFO]�[0m Latest Quality Status: �[0;34m[INFO]�[0m Recent monitoring activity: 📈 Current Quality Metrics
Generated on: Sun Jan 11 01:41:08 UTC 2026 Generated by AI DevOps Framework Code Review Monitoring |
![gemini-code-assist[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/956858?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Code Review
This pull request does a great job of improving the shell scripts by addressing ShellCheck warnings and standardizing return statements. The changes are mostly correct and enhance code quality. I've made one suggestion for dev-browser-helper.sh to improve the readability of the command's output while still resolving the original ShellCheck issue. Overall, this is a solid set of fixes.
.agent/scripts/dev-browser-helper.sh
Outdated
| echo "" | ||
| print_info "Contents:" | ||
| ls -la "${PROFILE_DIR}" 2>/dev/null | head -20 | ||
| find "${PROFILE_DIR}" -maxdepth 1 -exec ls -ld {} \; 2>/dev/null | head -20 |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
While this change correctly addresses the ShellCheck warning SC2012, it also alters the output format. The new command prepends the full profile directory path to each listed file and includes the profile directory itself in the listing. This makes the output more verbose and less readable than the original ls -la.
A better approach that preserves the original's clean output format while still being safe for filenames would be to change into the directory and then execute find. This avoids repeating the full path for every item.
| find "${PROFILE_DIR}" -maxdepth 1 -exec ls -ld {} \; 2>/dev/null | head -20 | |
| (cd "${PROFILE_DIR}" && find . -maxdepth 1 -mindepth 1 -exec ls -ld {} +) 2>/dev/null | head -20 |
🤖 Augment PR SummarySummary: Cleans up several 🤖 Was this summary useful? React with 👍 or 👎 |
![augmentcode[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/1027498?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
| ;; | ||
| esac | ||
|
|
||
| return 0 |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
main() unconditionally return 0 after the case, so non-zero returns from cmd_install/cmd_uninstall (e.g., when get_rc_file fails and they return 1) won’t propagate and the script will still exit successfully. Consider allowing main() to return the selected command’s status so callers can detect failure.
🤖 Was this useful? React with 👍 or 👎
- dev-browser-helper.sh: Use subshell cd + find for cleaner output format - terminal-title-setup.sh: Remove explicit return 0 to propagate command status
|
🔍 Code Quality Report�[0;35m[MONITOR]�[0m Code Review Monitoring Report �[0;34m[INFO]�[0m Latest Quality Status: �[0;34m[INFO]�[0m Recent monitoring activity: 📈 Current Quality Metrics
Generated on: Sun Jan 11 01:47:13 UTC 2026 Generated by AI DevOps Framework Code Review Monitoring |
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
1 participant
Summary
return 0aftermain "$@"in 3 scriptsreturn 0inmain()for 3 scriptsHELPER_SCRIPTvariable (SC2034) in terminal-title-setup.shls -lawithfind -exec ls -ld(SC2012) in dev-browser-helper.shFiles Changed
return 0after mainreturn 0after script bodyreturn 0after case statementreturn 0in main()return 0in main()Testing
Summary by CodeRabbit
✏️ Tip: You can customize this high-level summary in your review settings.