fix(docs): resolve Codacy markdown style issues and add markdown standards #258
Conversation
…dards - Remove duplicate H1 heading in seo-audit-skill.md (MD025) - Add markdown standards section to code-standards.md documenting: - MD022: Blank lines around headings - MD025: Single top-level heading - MD012: No multiple blank lines - MD031: Blank lines around code blocks - Add markdown linting to pre-commit checklist - Add markdown linting check to build-agent design checklist The Codacy issues shown were from commit 97a9374 and most were already auto-fixed. This commit addresses the remaining MD025 violation and adds documentation to prevent future issues.
Summary of ChangesHello @marcusquinn, I'm Gemini Code Assist1! I'm currently reviewing this pull request and will post my feedback shortly. In the meantime, here's a summary to help you and other reviewers quickly get up to speed! This pull request significantly enhances the consistency and quality of markdown documentation across the project. It addresses a specific, lingering Codacy markdown style issue and proactively prevents future occurrences by establishing clear markdown standards and integrating linting checks into development workflows. Highlights
Using Gemini Code AssistThe full guide for Gemini Code Assist can be found on our documentation page, here are some quick tips. Invoking Gemini You can request assistance from Gemini at any point by creating a comment using either
Customization To customize Gemini Code Assist for GitHub experience, repository maintainers can create a configuration file and/or provide a custom code review style guide (such as PEP-8 for Python) by creating and adding files to a Limitations & Feedback Gemini Code Assist may make mistakes. Please leave feedback on any instances where its feedback is incorrect or counter productive. You can react with 👍 and 👎 on @gemini-code-assist comments. If you're interested in giving your feedback about your experience with Gemini Code Assist for Github and other Google products, sign up here. You can also get AI-powered code generation, chat, as well as code reviews directly in the IDE at no cost with the Gemini Code Assist IDE Extension. Footnotes
|
WalkthroughThese changes introduce markdown linting standards, verification checklists, and quality guidance across agent documentation files. A duplicate heading is removed from one file, while comprehensive linting rules and pre-commit validation steps are added to establish markdown quality standards. Changes
Estimated code review effort🎯 2 (Simple) | ⏱️ ~12 minutes Possibly related PRs
Poem
🚥 Pre-merge checks | ✅ 3✅ Passed checks (3 passed)
✏️ Tip: You can configure your own custom pre-merge checks in the settings. Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out. Comment |
|
![gemini-code-assist[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/956858?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Code Review
This pull request effectively resolves a markdown linting issue and significantly improves the project's documentation by adding comprehensive markdown standards. The changes are well-structured and clearly explained. I've added one suggestion to improve the clarity of an example in the new standards documentation to make it even more helpful for developers.
| <!-- INCORRECT - Missing blank line --> | ||
| Some text. | ||
| ```bash | ||
| echo "hello" | ||
| ``` |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
The comment and example for the INCORRECT case of MD031 could be clearer. The current comment <!-- INCORRECT - Missing blank line --> is ambiguous because a violation of MD031 can happen by missing a line before, after, or both. The example also implicitly has a missing blank line after the code block, which can be confusing.
To make the standard easier to understand, it's better to provide a more specific example that isolates a single type of violation.
| <!-- INCORRECT - Missing blank line --> | |
| Some text. | |
| ```bash | |
| echo "hello" | |
| ``` | |
| <!-- INCORRECT - Missing blank line before code block --> | |
| Some text. | |
| ```bash | |
| echo "hello" |
More text.
🔍 Code Quality Report�[0;35m[MONITOR]�[0m Code Review Monitoring Report �[0;34m[INFO]�[0m Latest Quality Status: �[0;34m[INFO]�[0m Recent monitoring activity: 📈 Current Quality Metrics
Generated on: Thu Jan 29 16:43:32 UTC 2026 Generated by AI DevOps Framework Code Review Monitoring |
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
🤖 Augment PR SummarySummary: This PR fixes the last reported Codacy markdownlint issue and documents markdownlint rules to prevent regressions. Changes:
markdownlint-cli2 using the repo’s config/ignore patterns.
🤖 Was this summary useful? React with 👍 or 👎 |
![augmentcode[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/1027498?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
|
|
||
| ## Markdown Standards | ||
|
|
||
| All markdown files must pass markdownlint with zero violations. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
This states that all markdown must pass markdownlint with zero violations, but the current local linter flow appears to treat markdown violations as non-blocking; consider clarifying whether this is an enforced requirement vs an aspirational standard.
🤖 Was this useful? React with 👍 or 👎
1 participant
Summary
Changes
Bug Fix
# seo-auditH1 heading that was causing MD025 violationDocumentation
code-standards.md: Added new "Markdown Standards" section documenting:
build-agent.md: Added markdown linting check to agent design checklist
Context
The Codacy issues shown were from commit 97a9374. Most were already auto-fixed by the GitHub Actions workflow. This PR addresses the remaining MD025 violation and adds documentation to prevent future markdown style issues.
Testing
Summary by CodeRabbit
✏️ Tip: You can customize this high-level summary in your review settings.