docs: update README counts and add new slash commands from recent PRs #252
Conversation
|
Warning Rate limit exceeded
⌛ How to resolve this issue?After the wait time has elapsed, a review can be triggered using the We recommend that you space out your commits to avoid hitting the rate limit. 🚦 How do rate limits work?CodeRabbit enforces hourly rate limits for each developer per organization. Our paid plans have higher rate limits than the trial, open-source and free plans. In all cases, we re-allow further reviews after a brief timeout. Please see our FAQ for further information. Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out. Comment |
Summary of ChangesHello @marcusquinn, I'm Gemini Code Assist1! I'm currently reviewing this pull request and will post my feedback shortly. In the meantime, here's a summary to help you and other reviewers quickly get up to speed! This pull request focuses on keeping the project's documentation, specifically the Highlights
Using Gemini Code AssistThe full guide for Gemini Code Assist can be found on our documentation page, here are some quick tips. Invoking Gemini You can request assistance from Gemini at any point by creating a comment using either
Customization To customize Gemini Code Assist for GitHub experience, repository maintainers can create a configuration file and/or provide a custom code review style guide (such as PEP-8 for Python) by creating and adding files to a Limitations & Feedback Gemini Code Assist may make mistakes. Please leave feedback on any instances where its feedback is incorrect or counter productive. You can react with 👍 and 👎 on @gemini-code-assist comments. If you're interested in giving your feedback about your experience with Gemini Code Assist for Github and other Google products, sign up here. You can also get AI-powered code generation, chat, as well as code reviews directly in the IDE at no cost with the Gemini Code Assist IDE Extension. Footnotes
|
|
🔍 Code Quality Report�[0;35m[MONITOR]�[0m Code Review Monitoring Report �[0;34m[INFO]�[0m Latest Quality Status: �[0;34m[INFO]�[0m Recent monitoring activity: 📈 Current Quality Metrics
Generated on: Thu Jan 29 01:11:56 UTC 2026 Generated by AI DevOps Framework Code Review Monitoring |
🤖 Augment PR SummarySummary: Updates README metrics and command documentation to reflect the current 🤖 Was this summary useful? React with 👍 or 👎 |
![augmentcode[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/1027498?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
| - 148 helper scripts in `.agent/scripts/` | ||
| - 16 slash commands for common workflows | ||
| - 547+ subagent markdown files organized by domain | ||
| - 155 helper scripts in `.agent/scripts/` |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
The repo tree section later in the README still says .agent/scripts/ has 146 helper scripts (README.md:1831), which conflicts with the updated 155 count here; consider updating that stale reference so counts stay consistent.
Other Locations
README.md:1831
🤖 Was this useful? React with 👍 or 👎
| ``` | ||
|
|
||
| This installs the complete framework: 15 primary agents, 552+ subagents, and 147 helper scripts. | ||
| This installs the complete framework: 14 primary agents, 547+ subagents, and 155 helper scripts. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
The README’s repo tree section still labels .agent/*.md as 15 primary agents (README.md:1830), which seems inconsistent with the 14 primary agents count stated here (unless @plan-plus is being counted differently); consider aligning the wording/counts to avoid confusion.
Other Locations
README.md:1830
🤖 Was this useful? React with 👍 or 👎
![gemini-code-assist[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/956858?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Code Review
This pull request updates various counts (subagents, helper scripts, slash commands, primary agents) in the README.md file to reflect the current state of the project. It also documents four new slash commands that were recently added. The changes make the documentation more accurate and consistent. However, I noticed a couple of counts were missed in the update, which I've listed below. It would be great to include these in the update to ensure full consistency.
- Line 1830 still refers to
15 primary agents(should be 14). - Line 1831 still refers to
146 helper scripts(should be 155).
I've also added a comment about a minor inconsistency in the description of the subagent count change which could be clarified to avoid confusion. Overall, a good documentation update that would be even better with the missed counts fixed.
| ``` | ||
|
|
||
| This installs the complete framework: 15 primary agents, 552+ subagents, and 147 helper scripts. | ||
| This installs the complete framework: 14 primary agents, 547+ subagents, and 155 helper scripts. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Thanks for making the counts consistent! Just a small note for clarity: the PR description says the subagent count increased (539+ -> 547+), but here the change is a decrease (552+ -> 547+). It might be helpful to update the PR description to mention that the counts were unified to the correct value of 547+, which involved adjustments in different directions across the file. This will help avoid confusion for anyone reviewing the history.
1 participant
Summary
Changes
Count Updates
New Commands Documented
From PR #245 (SEO data export):
/seo-export- Export SEO data from GSC, Bing, Ahrefs, DataForSEO to TOON format/seo-analyze- Analyze exported data for quick wins, striking distance, low CTR/seo-opportunities- Combined export + analysis workflowFrom PR #248 (issue reporting):
/log-issue-aidevops- Report issues with aidevops (gathers diagnostics, checks duplicates, creates GitHub issue)Testing
findcommands on.agent/directory