chore: mark t005 multi-tenant credential storage as complete#227
chore: mark t005 multi-tenant credential storage as complete#227marcusquinn merged 2 commits intomainfrom
Conversation
Single coding agent that handles both planning and execution modes. Intent detection replaces agent separation. Pre-edit check remains as safety gate for accidental main branch edits. Includes t079.8 for setup.sh cleanup of removed agents on existing installs.
|
Note Other AI code review bot(s) detectedCodeRabbit has detected other AI code review bot(s) in this pull request and will avoid duplicating their findings in the review comments. This may lead to a less comprehensive review. WalkthroughDocumentation update to TODO.md that marks the multi-tenant credential storage task (t005) as completed and introduces a comprehensive refactor plan (t079) for consolidating Plan+ and AI-DevOps agents into Build+ with eight sequential subtasks and detailed architectural notes. Changes
Estimated code review effort🎯 1 (Trivial) | ⏱️ ~3 minutes Possibly related PRs
Poem
🚥 Pre-merge checks | ✅ 3✅ Passed checks (3 passed)
✏️ Tip: You can configure your own custom pre-merge checks in the settings. Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out. Comment |
Summary of ChangesHello @marcusquinn, I'm Gemini Code Assist1! I'm currently reviewing this pull request and will post my feedback shortly. In the meantime, here's a summary to help you and other reviewers quickly get up to speed! This pull request updates the project's Highlights
Using Gemini Code AssistThe full guide for Gemini Code Assist can be found on our documentation page, here are some quick tips. Invoking Gemini You can request assistance from Gemini at any point by creating a comment using either
Customization To customize Gemini Code Assist for GitHub experience, repository maintainers can create a configuration file and/or provide a custom code review style guide (such as PEP-8 for Python) by creating and adding files to a Limitations & Feedback Gemini Code Assist may make mistakes. Please leave feedback on any instances where its feedback is incorrect or counter productive. You can react with 👍 and 👎 on @gemini-code-assist comments. If you're interested in giving your feedback about your experience with Gemini Code Assist for Github and other Google products, sign up here. You can also get AI-powered code generation, chat, as well as code reviews directly in the IDE at no cost with the Gemini Code Assist IDE Extension. Footnotes
|
|
![gemini-code-assist[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/956858?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Code Review
This pull request correctly updates TODO.md to mark task t005 as complete, which aligns with the PR's stated goal. However, it also introduces a large, unrelated new task t079 concerning a major refactor. To maintain clarity and focus, it's recommended to remove the addition of t079 from this PR and submit it separately.
| - [ ] t079 Consolidate Plan+ and AI-DevOps into Build+ #refactor #agents #architecture ~4h (ai:3h test:1h) logged:2026-01-25 | ||
| - Notes: Remove Plan+ and AI-DevOps as separate primary agents. Build+ becomes the single coding/devops agent. | ||
| - [ ] t079.1 Audit AI-DevOps for unique knowledge to merge into Build+ ~30m | ||
| - Notes: AI-DevOps has: framework operations (setup, troubleshooting, architecture), MCP integrations, OpenCode plugins, credential management. Most already accessible via subagents. Merge any unique content into Build+ or ensure subagent coverage. | ||
| - [ ] t079.2 Add intent detection to Build+ (deliberation vs execution) ~1h | ||
| - Notes: Build+ should detect message intent: "What do you think..." / "How should we..." → research/discuss mode (don't code yet). "Implement X" / "Fix Y" / "Add Z" → execution mode. Ambiguous → ask "implement now or discuss first?" | ||
| - [ ] t079.3 Merge Plan+ planning workflow into Build+ ~1h | ||
| - Notes: Plan+ has: parallel explore agents, investigation phases, synthesis, handoff protocol. Build+ should incorporate these as modes, not separate agent. Keep pre-edit git check as the safety gate (not agent separation). | ||
| - [ ] t079.4 Remove Plan+ from primary agents ~30m | ||
| - Notes: Remove from opencode.json agent list, delete plan-plus.md, update generate-opencode-agents.sh, remove Plan+ specific permissions/tools config. | ||
| - [ ] t079.5 Remove AI-DevOps from primary agents ~30m | ||
| - Notes: Keep aidevops.md as subagent (@aidevops) for framework-specific tasks. Remove from primary agent list. Users invoke via @aidevops when needed. | ||
| - [ ] t079.6 Update AGENTS.md and documentation ~30m | ||
| - Notes: Update greeting workflow (no Plan+ fallback needed), update agent switching docs, update onboarding to reflect single-agent model. | ||
| - [ ] t079.7 Test Build+ handles planning and execution modes ~30m | ||
| - Notes: Test: "What's the best approach for X?" (should research, not code). "Implement X" (should code). "Review this" (should analyze). Verify pre-edit check still prevents accidental main branch edits. | ||
| - [ ] t079.8 Update setup.sh and aidevops update to cleanup removed agents ~30m | ||
| - Notes: setup.sh must: 1) Remove Plan+ from opencode.json agent list, 2) Remove AI-DevOps from primary agents (keep as subagent), 3) Delete orphaned agent files from ~/.config/opencode/agent/, 4) Update default_agent to Build+. This ensures existing installs get cleaned up on `aidevops update`. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
The addition of this new task t079 and its subtasks seems out of scope for this pull request, which is intended only to mark task t005 as complete. Including a large, unrelated change like this can create confusion and makes the commit history harder to follow. It would be best to move this new refactoring plan to a separate pull request.
🔍 Code Quality Report�[0;35m[MONITOR]�[0m Code Review Monitoring Report �[0;34m[INFO]�[0m Latest Quality Status: �[0;34m[INFO]�[0m Recent monitoring activity: 📈 Current Quality Metrics
Generated on: Sun Jan 25 19:54:53 UTC 2026 Generated by AI DevOps Framework Code Review Monitoring |
🤖 Augment PR SummarySummary: Marks 🤖 Was this summary useful? React with 👍 or 👎 |
![augmentcode[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/1027498?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
| t008,aidevops-opencode Plugin,,plan,2d,1d,0.5d,0.5d,2025-12-21T01:50Z,pending,,, | ||
| t004,Add Ahrefs MCP server integration,,seo,2d,1d,0.5d,0.5d,2025-12-20T00:00Z,pending,,, | ||
| t005,Implement multi-tenant credential storage,,security,5d,3d,1.5d,0.5d,2025-12-20T00:00Z,pending,,, | ||
| t005,Implement multi-tenant credential storage,,security,5d,3d,1.5d,0.5d,2025-12-20T00:00Z,done,2026-01-24,, |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
In the <!--TOON:backlog...{...,status,blocked_by,...}--> schema, the field immediately after status is labeled blocked_by, but this row now stores 2026-01-24 there. If any tooling relies on these column semantics, it may interpret that date as a blocker rather than completion metadata.
🤖 Was this useful? React with 👍 or 👎
|
@coderabbitai review |
✅ Actions performedReview triggered.
|
|
@coderabbitai review |
✅ Actions performedReview triggered.
|
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 2
🤖 Fix all issues with AI agents
In `@TODO.md`:
- Line 67: Move the completed task entry for "t005 Implement multi-tenant
credential storage" out of the Backlog and into the Done section: delete the
Backlog list item matching "t005 Implement multi-tenant credential storage
`#security` ~1.5d (ai:8h test:4h read:2h) logged:2025-12-20 completed:2026-01-24"
and append the same line under the Done section (after the Done header starting
at line ~294) so the task appears in Done instead of Backlog.
- Line 215: Remove the erroneous backlog entry for task id "t005" (the CSV row
starting with "t005,Implement multi-tenant credential storage") and migrate it
into the done CSV section using the done-schema fields
{id,desc,owner,tags,est,actual,logged,started,completed,status}; ensure you drop
the extra `0.5d` field, move the `2026-01-24` value into the correct `completed`
(or `started`/`blocked_by` as appropriate) column per the done schema, and place
the new row after the done CSV header (line ~330) so the task is removed from
backlog and recorded correctly as done.
♻️ Duplicate comments (1)
TODO.md (1)
173-190: Out of scope: t079 refactor plan unrelated to PR objective.The addition of t079 (Plan+ and AI-DevOps consolidation) and its 8 subtasks is unrelated to marking t005 as complete. This should be in a separate PR to maintain clear commit history and easier review.
| - [ ] t008 aidevops-opencode Plugin #plan → [todo/PLANS.md#aidevops-opencode-plugin] ~4h (ai:2h test:1h read:1h) logged:2025-12-21 | ||
| - [x] t004 Add Ahrefs MCP server integration #seo ~4h (ai:2h test:1h read:1h) logged:2025-12-20 completed:2026-01-25 | ||
| - [ ] t005 Implement multi-tenant credential storage #security ~1.5d (ai:8h test:4h read:2h) logged:2025-12-20 | ||
| - [x] t005 Implement multi-tenant credential storage #security ~1.5d (ai:8h test:4h read:2h) logged:2025-12-20 completed:2026-01-24 |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Move completed task t005 from Backlog to Done section.
Task t005 is marked complete but remains in the Backlog section. Per the TODO.md format, completed tasks should be relocated to the Done section (starting at line 294).
📋 Recommended fix
- Remove line 67 from the Backlog section
- Add to the Done section (after line 296):
+- [x] t005 Implement multi-tenant credential storage `#security` ~1.5d (ai:8h test:4h read:2h) logged:2025-12-20 completed:2026-01-24
+ - Notes: Implementation existed in v2.80.0 via PR `#178`. Multi-tenant credential storage allows secure isolation of credentials per tenant/workspace.🤖 Prompt for AI Agents
In `@TODO.md` at line 67, Move the completed task entry for "t005 Implement
multi-tenant credential storage" out of the Backlog and into the Done section:
delete the Backlog list item matching "t005 Implement multi-tenant credential
storage `#security` ~1.5d (ai:8h test:4h read:2h) logged:2025-12-20
completed:2026-01-24" and append the same line under the Done section (after the
Done header starting at line ~294) so the task appears in Done instead of
Backlog.
| t008,aidevops-opencode Plugin,,plan,2d,1d,0.5d,0.5d,2025-12-21T01:50Z,pending,,, | ||
| t004,Add Ahrefs MCP server integration,,seo,2d,1d,0.5d,0.5d,2025-12-20T00:00Z,pending,,, | ||
| t005,Implement multi-tenant credential storage,,security,5d,3d,1.5d,0.5d,2025-12-20T00:00Z,pending,,, | ||
| t005,Implement multi-tenant credential storage,,security,5d,3d,1.5d,0.5d,2025-12-20T00:00Z,done,2026-01-24,, |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Migrate t005 from backlog CSV to done CSV with correct schema.
Line 215 has multiple issues:
- Contains 13 fields but backlog schema expects 12 (extra
0.5dfield) 2026-01-24appears in theblocked_byfield position (field 10 per schema at line 198)- Task is marked
donebut remains in backlog CSV instead of done CSV
The done section has a different schema (line 330): {id,desc,owner,tags,est,actual,logged,started,completed,status}
🔧 Recommended fix
- Remove line 215 from the backlog CSV block
- Add to the done CSV block (after line 330 header, before the closing
-->):
+t005,Implement multi-tenant credential storage,,security,1.5d,,2025-12-20T00:00Z,,2026-01-24,doneNote: If actual time or started date are known, include them in the appropriate positions.
🤖 Prompt for AI Agents
In `@TODO.md` at line 215, Remove the erroneous backlog entry for task id "t005"
(the CSV row starting with "t005,Implement multi-tenant credential storage") and
migrate it into the done CSV section using the done-schema fields
{id,desc,owner,tags,est,actual,logged,started,completed,status}; ensure you drop
the extra `0.5d` field, move the `2026-01-24` value into the correct `completed`
(or `started`/`blocked_by` as appropriate) column per the done schema, and place
the new row after the done CSV header (line ~330) so the task is removed from
backlog and recorded correctly as done.
1 participant
Summary
Summary by CodeRabbit
✏️ Tip: You can customize this high-level summary in your review settings.