Skip to content

docs: add recent features to README#215

Merged
marcusquinn merged 1 commit intomainfrom
docs/readme-new-features
Jan 25, 2026
Merged

docs: add recent features to README#215
marcusquinn merged 1 commit intomainfrom
docs/readme-new-features

Conversation

@marcusquinn
Copy link
Owner

Summary

Documents recent features that were missing from README.md.

New Documentation

Commands Added

Command PR Description
/performance #209 Web performance audit (Core Web Vitals, Lighthouse, PageSpeed)
/email-health-check #213 SPF/DKIM/DMARC/MX validation, blacklist checking

Subagents Added

Subagent PR Description
@debug-opengraph #206 Validate Open Graph meta tags, preview social sharing
@debug-favicon #206 Validate favicon setup across platforms

Features Added

Feature PR Description
Auto-task completion #208 Tasks auto-marked complete when commits reference them

Core Capabilities Updated

  • Added Performance Auditing details (Core Web Vitals)
  • Added SEO Debugging section
  • Added Email Deliverability section

New features documented:
- /performance command for web performance audits (PR #209)
- /email-health-check command for deliverability checks (PR #213)
- @debug-opengraph and @debug-favicon SEO subagents (PR #206)
- Auto-task completion from commit messages (PR #208)

Updated Core Capabilities section with new monitoring features.
@coderabbitai
Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented Jan 25, 2026

Warning

Rate limit exceeded

@marcusquinn has exceeded the limit for the number of commits that can be reviewed per hour. Please wait 18 minutes and 56 seconds before requesting another review.

⌛ How to resolve this issue?

After the wait time has elapsed, a review can be triggered using the @coderabbitai review command as a PR comment. Alternatively, push new commits to this PR.

We recommend that you space out your commits to avoid hitting the rate limit.

🚦 How do rate limits work?

CodeRabbit enforces hourly rate limits for each developer per organization.

Our paid plans have higher rate limits than the trial, open-source and free plans. In all cases, we re-allow further reviews after a brief timeout.

Please see our FAQ for further information.


Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share

Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands and usage tips.

@gemini-code-assist
Copy link

Summary of Changes

Hello @marcusquinn, I'm Gemini Code Assist1! I'm currently reviewing this pull request and will post my feedback shortly. In the meantime, here's a summary to help you and other reviewers quickly get up to speed!

This pull request updates the README.md file to accurately reflect several recently implemented features and capabilities. The changes ensure that the documentation is current, providing users with comprehensive information on new commands, subagents, and core functionalities related to performance auditing, SEO debugging, email deliverability, and automated task management.

Highlights

  • Documentation of New Commands: The /performance command for web performance audits (Core Web Vitals, Lighthouse, PageSpeed) and the /email-health-check command for SPF/DKIM/DMARC/MX validation and blacklist checking have been added to the documentation.
  • Documentation of New Subagents: The @debug-opengraph subagent for validating Open Graph meta tags and @debug-favicon for validating favicon setup are now documented.
  • Documentation of New Features: The 'Auto-task completion' feature, which automatically marks tasks as complete when referenced in commit messages, has been added to the documentation.
  • Updated Capability Descriptions: The 'Quality Control & Monitoring' section now includes enhanced descriptions for Performance Auditing (mentioning Core Web Vitals), a new 'SEO Debugging' section, and a new 'Email Deliverability' section.
Using Gemini Code Assist

The full guide for Gemini Code Assist can be found on our documentation page, here are some quick tips.

Invoking Gemini

You can request assistance from Gemini at any point by creating a comment using either /gemini <command> or @gemini-code-assist <command>. Below is a summary of the supported commands on the current page.

Feature Command Description
Code Review /gemini review Performs a code review for the current pull request in its current state.
Pull Request Summary /gemini summary Provides a summary of the current pull request in its current state.
Comment @gemini-code-assist Responds in comments when explicitly tagged, both in pull request comments and review comments.
Help /gemini help Displays a list of available commands.

Customization

To customize Gemini Code Assist for GitHub experience, repository maintainers can create a configuration file and/or provide a custom code review style guide (such as PEP-8 for Python) by creating and adding files to a .gemini/ folder in the base of the repository. Detailed instructions can be found here.

Limitations & Feedback

Gemini Code Assist may make mistakes. Please leave feedback on any instances where its feedback is incorrect or counter productive. You can react with 👍 and 👎 on @gemini-code-assist comments. If you're interested in giving your feedback about your experience with Gemini Code Assist for Github and other Google products, sign up here.

You can also get AI-powered code generation, chat, as well as code reviews directly in the IDE at no cost with the Gemini Code Assist IDE Extension.

Footnotes

  1. Review the Privacy Notices, Generative AI Prohibited Use Policy, Terms of Service, and learn how to configure Gemini Code Assist in GitHub here. Gemini can make mistakes, so double check it and use code with caution.

@marcusquinn marcusquinn merged commit ed33275 into main Jan 25, 2026
6 of 8 checks passed
@sonarqubecloud
Copy link

Copy link

@gemini-code-assist gemini-code-assist bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Code Review

This pull request updates the README.md to document several new features, including performance auditing, SEO debugging, email deliverability checks, and auto-task completion. The changes are clear and well-structured, adding new sections and commands to the documentation. I have one minor suggestion to improve clarity in the description of the @debug-favicon subagent.

| Subagent | Purpose |
|----------|---------|
| `@debug-opengraph` | Validate Open Graph meta tags, preview social sharing |
| `@debug-favicon` | Validate favicon setup across platforms (ico, apple-touch, manifest) |

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

medium

For improved clarity and technical accuracy, it's better to use the full term apple-touch-icon instead of the abbreviated apple-touch. This ensures the documentation is precise and unambiguous for developers.

Suggested change
| `@debug-favicon` | Validate favicon setup across platforms (ico, apple-touch, manifest) |
| `@debug-favicon` | Validate favicon setup across platforms (ico, apple-touch-icon, manifest) |

@github-actions
Copy link

🔍 Code Quality Report

�[0;35m[MONITOR]�[0m Code Review Monitoring Report

�[0;34m[INFO]�[0m Latest Quality Status:
SonarCloud: 0 bugs, 0 vulnerabilities, 447 code smells

�[0;34m[INFO]�[0m Recent monitoring activity:
Sun Jan 25 15:12:47 UTC 2026: Code review monitoring started
Sun Jan 25 15:12:47 UTC 2026: SonarCloud - Bugs: 0, Vulnerabilities: 0, Code Smells: 447
Sun Jan 25 15:12:47 UTC 2026: Qlty - 0 issues found, auto-formatting applied
Sun Jan 25 15:12:49 UTC 2026: Codacy analysis completed with auto-fixes

📈 Current Quality Metrics

  • BUGS: 0
  • CODE SMELLS: 447
  • VULNERABILITIES: 0

Generated on: Sun Jan 25 15:14:11 UTC 2026


Generated by AI DevOps Framework Code Review Monitoring

@augmentcode
Copy link

augmentcode bot commented Jan 25, 2026

🤖 Augment PR Summary

Summary: Updates the README to document recently added capabilities around performance audits, SEO debugging, and email deliverability checks.

Changes: Expands Core Capabilities and command listings to include /performance, new @debug-* SEO subagents, /email-health-check, and notes on release-time auto task completion.

🤖 Was this summary useful? React with 👍 or 👎

Copy link

@augmentcode augmentcode bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Review completed. 2 suggestions posted.

Fix All in Augment

Comment augment review to trigger a new review at any time.


- **Multi-Platform Analysis**: SonarCloud, CodeFactor, Codacy, CodeRabbit, Qlty, Gemini Code Assist, Snyk
- **Performance Auditing**: PageSpeed Insights and Lighthouse integration
- **Performance Auditing**: PageSpeed Insights, Lighthouse, Core Web Vitals (`/performance` command)
Copy link

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

/performance appears to be implemented primarily via Chrome DevTools MCP + Lighthouse/CWV; if it doesn’t actually call PageSpeed Insights, mentioning “PageSpeed Insights” here (and in the command table) may be misleading.

Other Locations
  • README.md:1409

Fix This in Augment

🤖 Was this useful? React with 👍 or 👎

| `/keyword-research-extended` | Full SERP analysis with weakness detection |
| `/webmaster-keywords` | Keywords from GSC + Bing for your verified sites |

**SEO Debugging** (subagents in `seo/`):
Copy link

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This references subagents in seo/, but the repo sources are under .agent/seo/ (and typically deployed to ~/.aidevops/agents/seo/); consider clarifying the intended path to avoid confusion.

Fix This in Augment

🤖 Was this useful? React with 👍 or 👎

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant