Skip to content

Comments

t005.1: Design AI chat sidebar component architecture and state management approach#1917

Merged
marcusquinn merged 4 commits intomainfrom
feature/t005.1
Feb 19, 2026
Merged

t005.1: Design AI chat sidebar component architecture and state management approach#1917
marcusquinn merged 4 commits intomainfrom
feature/t005.1

Conversation

@marcusquinn
Copy link
Owner

@marcusquinn marcusquinn commented Feb 19, 2026

Summary

Design the AI chat sidebar component architecture and state management approach for the aidevops dashboard.

  • Architecture document (.agents/tools/ui/ai-chat-sidebar.md) with design decisions, component tree, data flow, API design, and migration path for t005.2-t005.4
  • Shared type definitions (.opencode/ui/chat-sidebar/types.ts) covering messages, conversations, contexts, API request/response, SSE events, and hook return types
  • Configuration constants (.opencode/ui/chat-sidebar/constants.ts) for sidebar dimensions, cookies, API endpoints, keyboard shortcuts, and accessibility labels
  • Three split React Context providers (sidebar/chat/settings) following the existing react-context.md patterns with cookie and localStorage persistence
  • Hook stubs for SSE streaming, drag-to-resize, and chat orchestration
  • API client and storage utility stubs

Design Decisions

  1. React scoped to sidebar only — existing vanilla dashboard unchanged
  2. React Context (not Redux/Zustand) — 3 split contexts by update frequency
  3. SSE for streaming (not WebSocket) — simpler for unidirectional AI responses
  4. Elysia API routes — extends existing server infrastructure

Files Changed

.agents/tools/ui/ai-chat-sidebar.md          # Architecture document
.opencode/ui/chat-sidebar/
├── types.ts                                   # Shared type definitions
├── constants.ts                               # Configuration constants
├── index.tsx                                  # Entry point + provider composition
├── context/
│   ├── sidebar-context.tsx                    # Panel state (open/width)
│   ├── chat-context.tsx                       # Conversation + streaming state
│   └── settings-context.tsx                   # Model + AI config
├── hooks/
│   ├── use-streaming.ts                       # SSE streaming hook
│   ├── use-resize.ts                          # Drag-to-resize hook
│   └── use-chat.ts                            # Chat orchestration hook
└── lib/
    ├── api-client.ts                          # Typed API client
    └── storage.ts                             # Cookie/localStorage helpers

Ref #1902

…5.1)

Design decisions documented:
- React for sidebar only (not rewriting existing vanilla dashboard)
- React Context with 3 split contexts (sidebar/chat/settings) per react-context.md patterns
- SSE for streaming (simpler than WebSocket for unidirectional AI responses)
- Elysia API routes for backend integration

Deliverables:
- .agents/tools/ui/ai-chat-sidebar.md — full architecture document
- .opencode/ui/chat-sidebar/types.ts — shared type definitions
- .opencode/ui/chat-sidebar/constants.ts — configuration constants
- .opencode/ui/chat-sidebar/ directory structure for t005.2-t005.4
@gemini-code-assist
Copy link

Warning

You have reached your daily quota limit. Please wait up to 24 hours and I will start processing your requests again!

@coderabbitai
Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented Feb 19, 2026

Warning

Rate limit exceeded

@marcusquinn has exceeded the limit for the number of commits that can be reviewed per hour. Please wait 4 minutes and 27 seconds before requesting another review.

⌛ How to resolve this issue?

After the wait time has elapsed, a review can be triggered using the @coderabbitai review command as a PR comment. Alternatively, push new commits to this PR.

We recommend that you space out your commits to avoid hitting the rate limit.

🚦 How do rate limits work?

CodeRabbit enforces hourly rate limits for each developer per organization.

Our paid plans have higher rate limits than the trial, open-source and free plans. In all cases, we re-allow further reviews after a brief timeout.

Please see our FAQ for further information.

✨ Finishing Touches
🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)
  • Create PR with unit tests
  • Post copyable unit tests in a comment
  • Commit unit tests in branch feature/t005.1

Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share

Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands and usage tips.

@github-actions
Copy link

🔍 Code Quality Report

�[0;35m[MONITOR]�[0m Code Review Monitoring Report

�[0;34m[INFO]�[0m Latest Quality Status:
SonarCloud: 0 bugs, 0 vulnerabilities, 29 code smells

�[0;34m[INFO]�[0m Recent monitoring activity:
Thu Feb 19 04:26:28 UTC 2026: Code review monitoring started
Thu Feb 19 04:26:28 UTC 2026: SonarCloud - Bugs: 0, Vulnerabilities: 0, Code Smells: 29

📈 Current Quality Metrics

  • BUGS: 0
  • CODE SMELLS: 29
  • VULNERABILITIES: 0

Generated on: Thu Feb 19 04:26:30 UTC 2026


Generated by AI DevOps Framework Code Review Monitoring

…005.1)

Three split contexts per react-context.md performance pattern:
- SidebarContext: panel open/close/width with cookie persistence
- ChatContext: conversations, messages, streaming state with localStorage
- SettingsContext: model tier, temperature, context sources with cookie persistence

Provider composition in index.tsx with re-exports for consumer convenience.
Contexts include safe fallback defaults when used outside providers.
…lient, storage) stubs (t005.1)

Hooks define the interfaces for t005.2-t005.4 implementation:
- useStreaming: SSE streaming with AbortController, timeout, event parsing
- useResize: pointer-event drag handler with width clamping
- useChatOrchestrator: bridges ChatContext with streaming hook

Lib provides shared utilities:
- api-client: typed fetch wrappers for all chat API endpoints
- storage: cookie and localStorage helpers with error recovery
UseResizeReturn.handleProps now uses plain PointerEvent and Record<string, string>
instead of React.PointerEvent and React.CSSProperties. This allows types.ts to
type-check without React installed (React is added in t005.2).
@marcusquinn marcusquinn marked this pull request as ready for review February 19, 2026 04:30
@gemini-code-assist
Copy link

Warning

You have reached your daily quota limit. Please wait up to 24 hours and I will start processing your requests again!

@github-actions
Copy link

🔍 Code Quality Report

�[0;35m[MONITOR]�[0m Code Review Monitoring Report

�[0;34m[INFO]�[0m Latest Quality Status:
SonarCloud: 0 bugs, 0 vulnerabilities, 29 code smells

�[0;34m[INFO]�[0m Recent monitoring activity:
Thu Feb 19 04:30:36 UTC 2026: Code review monitoring started
Thu Feb 19 04:30:36 UTC 2026: SonarCloud - Bugs: 0, Vulnerabilities: 0, Code Smells: 29

📈 Current Quality Metrics

  • BUGS: 0
  • CODE SMELLS: 29
  • VULNERABILITIES: 0

Generated on: Thu Feb 19 04:30:39 UTC 2026


Generated by AI DevOps Framework Code Review Monitoring

@sonarqubecloud
Copy link

@marcusquinn marcusquinn merged commit 40a72ed into main Feb 19, 2026
10 of 11 checks passed
@marcusquinn marcusquinn deleted the feature/t005.1 branch February 19, 2026 04:46
marcusquinn added a commit that referenced this pull request Feb 21, 2026
The t005.1 PR #1917 was merged with all deliverables but the subagent
index was not updated. This was the only gap identified by VERIFY.md
entry v189. Adds the missing ai-chat-sidebar entry to the tools/ui
section of the subagent index.
marcusquinn added a commit that referenced this pull request Feb 21, 2026
The t005.1 AI chat sidebar work was merged via PR #1917 but the
subagent-index.toon was never updated to include the new ai-chat-sidebar
entry under tools/ui/. Prior verification PR #2047 identified this gap
but was closed without merging.
marcusquinn added a commit that referenced this pull request Feb 21, 2026
The t005.1 AI chat sidebar work was merged via PR #1917 but the
subagent-index.toon was never updated to include the new ai-chat-sidebar
entry under tools/ui/. Prior verification PR #2047 identified this gap
but was closed without merging.
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant