Skip to content

Comments

t1107: Verify t1094 parent complete — all scope delivered via t1095-t1099 and t1094.1#1665

Closed
marcusquinn wants to merge 1 commit intomainfrom
feature/t1107
Closed

t1107: Verify t1094 parent complete — all scope delivered via t1095-t1099 and t1094.1#1665
marcusquinn wants to merge 1 commit intomainfrom
feature/t1107

Conversation

@marcusquinn
Copy link
Owner

t1107: Verify and close t1094 parent

Findings

t1094 (Unified model performance scoring, ~8h) was fully decomposed into subtasks that were numbered t1095–t1099 + t1094.1 rather than t1094.2–t1094.N. All subtasks have merged PRs.

Scope Coverage

Deliverable Task PR Merged
Prompt strategy tracking (normal/repeat/escalated) t1095 #1629 2026-02-18T03:15Z
Output quality gradient t1096 #1632 2026-02-18T03:44Z
Failure categorization t1096 #1632 2026-02-18T03:44Z
Token usage (tokens_in, tokens_out) t1095 #1629 2026-02-18T03:15Z
A/B comparison data t1098+t1099 #1637, #1634 2026-02-18
Prompt-repeat retry strategy t1097 #1631 2026-02-18T03:16Z
Build-agent reference update t1094.1 #1633 2026-02-18T03:27Z

Action Required (supervisor)

Mark t1094 complete in TODO.md:

- [x] t1094 ... pr:#1629 pr:#1631 pr:#1632 pr:#1633 pr:#1634 pr:#1637 verified:2026-02-18

No new subtasks needed — all scope was already delivered.

Ref #1655

…d t1094.1 (t1107)

All t1094 deliverables confirmed implemented:
- Prompt strategy tracking → t1095 (pr:#1629)
- Output quality gradient + failure categorization → t1096 (pr:#1632)
- Token usage → t1095 (pr:#1629)
- A/B comparison → t1098+t1099 (pr:#1637, pr:#1634)
- Prompt-repeat strategy → t1097 (pr:#1631)
- Build-agent reference → t1094.1 (pr:#1633)

t1094 parent ready to be marked complete: verified:2026-02-18
@coderabbitai
Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented Feb 18, 2026

Warning

Rate limit exceeded

@marcusquinn has exceeded the limit for the number of commits that can be reviewed per hour. Please wait 1 minutes and 58 seconds before requesting another review.

⌛ How to resolve this issue?

After the wait time has elapsed, a review can be triggered using the @coderabbitai review command as a PR comment. Alternatively, push new commits to this PR.

We recommend that you space out your commits to avoid hitting the rate limit.

🚦 How do rate limits work?

CodeRabbit enforces hourly rate limits for each developer per organization.

Our paid plans have higher rate limits than the trial, open-source and free plans. In all cases, we re-allow further reviews after a brief timeout.

Please see our FAQ for further information.

✨ Finishing Touches
🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)
  • Create PR with unit tests
  • Post copyable unit tests in a comment
  • Commit unit tests in branch feature/t1107

Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share

Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands and usage tips.

@gemini-code-assist
Copy link

Summary of Changes

Hello @marcusquinn, I'm Gemini Code Assist1! I'm currently reviewing this pull request and will post my feedback shortly. In the meantime, here's a summary to help you and other reviewers quickly get up to speed!

This pull request formally verifies and documents the completion of the t1094 parent task, "Unified model performance scoring." It confirms that all its intended scope has been delivered through a series of subtasks, each with a merged pull request, and provides a detailed record of this coverage. The PR concludes that t1094 can now be marked as complete.

Highlights

  • Task Verification: Verified the completion of parent task t1094 (Unified model performance scoring) by confirming all its decomposed subtasks (t1095–t1099 and t1094.1) have been successfully merged.
  • Scope Coverage Documentation: Documented that all original deliverables for t1094 have been addressed by specific subtasks and their corresponding merged pull requests, providing a clear record of completion.
Changelog
  • todo/tasks/t1094-verification.md
    • Created a new verification record document for task t1094.
    • Detailed the scope coverage of t1094 by listing its deliverables and the subtasks/PRs that fulfilled them.
    • Concluded that t1094 is complete and provided a proof-log of merged PRs.
Activity
  • A new verification record document for task t1094 was introduced.
  • The pull request explicitly requests a supervisor to mark t1094 as complete in TODO.md.
Using Gemini Code Assist

The full guide for Gemini Code Assist can be found on our documentation page, here are some quick tips.

Invoking Gemini

You can request assistance from Gemini at any point by creating a comment using either /gemini <command> or @gemini-code-assist <command>. Below is a summary of the supported commands on the current page.

Feature Command Description
Code Review /gemini review Performs a code review for the current pull request in its current state.
Pull Request Summary /gemini summary Provides a summary of the current pull request in its current state.
Comment @gemini-code-assist Responds in comments when explicitly tagged, both in pull request comments and review comments.
Help /gemini help Displays a list of available commands.

Customization

To customize Gemini Code Assist for GitHub experience, repository maintainers can create a configuration file and/or provide a custom code review style guide (such as PEP-8 for Python) by creating and adding files to a .gemini/ folder in the base of the repository. Detailed instructions can be found here.

Limitations & Feedback

Gemini Code Assist may make mistakes. Please leave feedback on any instances where its feedback is incorrect or counter productive. You can react with 👍 and 👎 on @gemini-code-assist comments. If you're interested in giving your feedback about your experience with Gemini Code Assist for Github and other Google products, sign up here.

You can also get AI-powered code generation, chat, as well as code reviews directly in the IDE at no cost with the Gemini Code Assist IDE Extension.

Footnotes

  1. Review the Privacy Notices, Generative AI Prohibited Use Policy, Terms of Service, and learn how to configure Gemini Code Assist in GitHub here. Gemini can make mistakes, so double check it and use code with caution.

@github-actions
Copy link

🔍 Code Quality Report

�[0;35m[MONITOR]�[0m Code Review Monitoring Report

�[0;34m[INFO]�[0m Latest Quality Status:
SonarCloud: 0 bugs, 0 vulnerabilities, 24 code smells

�[0;34m[INFO]�[0m Recent monitoring activity:
Wed Feb 18 15:22:56 UTC 2026: Code review monitoring started
Wed Feb 18 15:22:56 UTC 2026: SonarCloud - Bugs: 0, Vulnerabilities: 0, Code Smells: 24

📈 Current Quality Metrics

  • BUGS: 0
  • CODE SMELLS: 24
  • VULNERABILITIES: 0

Generated on: Wed Feb 18 15:22:59 UTC 2026


Generated by AI DevOps Framework Code Review Monitoring

@sonarqubecloud
Copy link

Copy link

@gemini-code-assist gemini-code-assist bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Code Review

This pull request introduces a verification record for task t1094, confirming that its scope has been fully addressed by the completion of subtasks t1095 through t1099 and t1094.1. The new markdown file, todo/tasks/t1094-verification.md, is well-structured and clearly documents the mapping of deliverables to their respective pull requests, providing solid evidence for closing the parent task. The approach aligns with the established project management workflow where verification tasks precede the final closure of parent tasks. The changes are correct and clear. No issues were found.

@marcusquinn
Copy link
Owner Author

Closing — task was cancelled.

@marcusquinn marcusquinn deleted the feature/t1107 branch February 21, 2026 01:59
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant