feat: add content summaries to subagent routing table#157
Conversation
Summary of ChangesHello @marcusquinn, I'm Gemini Code Assist1! I'm currently reviewing this pull request and will post my feedback shortly. In the meantime, here's a summary to help you and other reviewers quickly get up to speed! This pull request significantly enhances the AI's ability to efficiently route tasks to specialized subagents. By introducing a "Contains" column with semantic summaries in the subagent routing table, the system can now understand the specific knowledge and instructions within each subagent, thereby reducing the need for speculative file loading and improving overall decision-making accuracy. Highlights
Using Gemini Code AssistThe full guide for Gemini Code Assist can be found on our documentation page, here are some quick tips. Invoking Gemini You can request assistance from Gemini at any point by creating a comment using either
Customization To customize Gemini Code Assist for GitHub experience, repository maintainers can create a configuration file and/or provide a custom code review style guide (such as PEP-8 for Python) by creating and adding files to a Limitations & Feedback Gemini Code Assist may make mistakes. Please leave feedback on any instances where its feedback is incorrect or counter productive. You can react with 👍 and 👎 on @gemini-code-assist comments. If you're interested in giving your feedback about your experience with Gemini Code Assist for Github and other Google products, sign up here. You can also get AI-powered code generation, chat, as well as code reviews directly in the IDE at no cost with the Gemini Code Assist IDE Extension. Footnotes
|
|
Note Other AI code review bot(s) detectedCodeRabbit has detected other AI code review bot(s) in this pull request and will avoid duplicating their findings in the review comments. This may lead to a less comprehensive review. WalkthroughUpdates the Changes
Sequence Diagram(s)(Skipped — changes are documentation-only and do not introduce new runtime control flow.) Estimated code review effort🎯 1 (Trivial) | ⏱️ ~3 minutes Possibly related PRs
Poem
🚥 Pre-merge checks | ✅ 3✅ Passed checks (3 passed)
✏️ Tip: You can configure your own custom pre-merge checks in the settings. Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out. Comment |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Code Review
This pull request is a great enhancement, adding a "Contains" column to the subagent routing table in AGENTS.md. This provides valuable semantic summaries that should significantly improve the AI's routing decisions by describing the knowledge within each subagent's files. The changes are well-structured and consistently applied across the document. I have one minor suggestion to further improve the clarity of the new descriptions for the AI.
.agent/AGENTS.md
Outdated
| | macOS automation | `tools/automation/mac.md` | AppleScript snippets, JXA patterns, app control, accessibility API | | ||
| | Programmatic video | `tools/video/remotion.md` | React composition, animation timing, render commands, asset management | | ||
| | AI image/video generation | `tools/video/higgsfield.md` | 100+ model APIs, prompt formats, style parameters, generation workflows | | ||
| | Video prompt engineering | `tools/video/video-prompt-design.md` | Veo 3 meta prompts, 7-component framework, style/motion descriptors | |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
In the Contains column, the use of a slash in style/motion descriptors could be ambiguous for an AI parser. It might be interpreted as 'style and motion', 'style or motion', or a single combined term. To ensure clarity and provide a more precise semantic meaning for the AI, I suggest separating this into two distinct items.
| | Video prompt engineering | `tools/video/video-prompt-design.md` | Veo 3 meta prompts, 7-component framework, style/motion descriptors | | |
| | Video prompt engineering | `tools/video/video-prompt-design.md` | Veo 3 meta prompts, 7-component framework, style descriptors, motion descriptors | |
🤖 Augment PR SummarySummary: Enhances subagent routing guidance in
🤖 Was this summary useful? React with 👍 or 👎 |
| | `tools/context/` | Context optimization - semantic search, codebase indexing, token efficiency | osgrep, augment-context-engine, context-builder, context7, toon, dspy, llm-tldr | | ||
| | `tools/conversion/` | Format conversion - document transformation between formats | pandoc | | ||
| | `tools/video/` | Video creation - programmatic video generation, AI image/video generation, animations | remotion, higgsfield | | ||
| | `tools/video/` | Video creation - programmatic video generation, AI image/video generation, animations, prompt design | remotion, higgsfield, video-prompt-design | |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
video-prompt-design is referenced here (and later as tools/video/video-prompt-design.md), but that file doesn’t appear to exist under .agent/tools/video/ in this branch. If it’s missing, these entries will create a broken routing target when the agent tries to load the subagent.
Other Locations
.agent/AGENTS.md:603
🤖 Was this useful? React with 👍 or 👎
Inspired by PageIndex's tree node summaries, adds a 'Contains' column to the 'When to read subagents' table. This gives the AI specific knowledge descriptors for each subagent, enabling better routing decisions without loading the full file. Also adds video-prompt-design to the Subagent Folders table.
8e8b25b to
7ed28f3
Compare
|
🔍 Code Quality Report�[0;35m[MONITOR]�[0m Code Review Monitoring Report �[0;34m[INFO]�[0m Latest Quality Status: �[0;34m[INFO]�[0m Recent monitoring activity: 📈 Current Quality Metrics
Generated on: Fri Jan 23 22:56:34 UTC 2026 Generated by AI DevOps Framework Code Review Monitoring |



Summary
video-prompt-designto the Subagent Folders tableMotivation
The existing table had "Task Domain" (trigger) and "Read These" (file paths), but no description of what knowledge is inside. This meant the AI had to load files speculatively. The new "Contains" column provides enough semantic signal to decide whether loading is worthwhile — similar to how PageIndex gives each tree node a summary for reasoning-based retrieval.
Example
Before:
After:
Summary by CodeRabbit
✏️ Tip: You can customize this high-level summary in your review settings.