t1035: Fix ALL_STATUS_LABELS unbound variable — t1031 modularisation regression#1375
Conversation
Summary of ChangesHello @marcusquinn, I'm Gemini Code Assist1! I'm currently reviewing this pull request and will post my feedback shortly. In the meantime, here's a summary to help you and other reviewers quickly get up to speed! This pull request resolves a critical regression introduced by a recent modularization, which led to an unbound variable error. The fix reintroduces a necessary constant, thereby restoring the correct operation of issue status label management and enabling the successful dispatch and execution of worker processes. Highlights
Changelog
Activity
Using Gemini Code AssistThe full guide for Gemini Code Assist can be found on our documentation page, here are some quick tips. Invoking Gemini You can request assistance from Gemini at any point by creating a comment using either
Customization To customize Gemini Code Assist for GitHub experience, repository maintainers can create a configuration file and/or provide a custom code review style guide (such as PEP-8 for Python) by creating and adding files to a Limitations & Feedback Gemini Code Assist may make mistakes. Please leave feedback on any instances where its feedback is incorrect or counter productive. You can react with 👍 and 👎 on @gemini-code-assist comments. If you're interested in giving your feedback about your experience with Gemini Code Assist for Github and other Google products, sign up here. You can also get AI-powered code generation, chat, as well as code reviews directly in the IDE at no cost with the Gemini Code Assist IDE Extension. Footnotes
|
|
Warning Rate limit exceeded
⌛ How to resolve this issue?After the wait time has elapsed, a review can be triggered using the We recommend that you space out your commits to avoid hitting the rate limit. 🚦 How do rate limits work?CodeRabbit enforces hourly rate limits for each developer per organization. Our paid plans have higher rate limits than the trial, open-source and free plans. In all cases, we re-allow further reviews after a brief timeout. Please see our FAQ for further information. WalkthroughAdded Changes
Estimated code review effort🎯 2 (Simple) | ⏱️ ~10 minutes Possibly related issues
Possibly related PRs
Poem
🚥 Pre-merge checks | ✅ 3 | ❌ 1❌ Failed checks (1 warning)
✅ Passed checks (3 passed)
✏️ Tip: You can configure your own custom pre-merge checks in the settings. ✨ Finishing touches🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)
Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out. Comment |
🔍 Code Quality Report�[0;35m[MONITOR]�[0m Code Review Monitoring Report �[0;34m[INFO]�[0m Latest Quality Status: �[0;34m[INFO]�[0m Recent monitoring activity: 📈 Current Quality Metrics
Generated on: Fri Feb 13 14:57:54 UTC 2026 Generated by AI DevOps Framework Code Review Monitoring |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Code Review
This pull request correctly fixes a regression from the t1031 modularization by restoring the ALL_STATUS_LABELS constant, which resolves an unbound variable error. The fix is straightforward and necessary. I've kept the suggestion to improve the maintainability of the new constant by defining it as a bash array instead of a comma-separated string, as it aligns with general shell scripting best practices and repository style guidelines, and is not contradicted by any specific rules.
| # Used to remove stale labels before applying the new one. | ||
| # Restored from pre-modularisation supervisor-helper.sh (t1035). | ||
| ####################################### | ||
| ALL_STATUS_LABELS="status:available,status:queued,status:claimed,status:in-review,status:blocked,status:verify-failed,status:done" |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
For better maintainability and robustness, it's recommended to define this list of labels as a bash array instead of a comma-separated string. Using an array avoids the need for string splitting (e.g., with tr or by changing IFS) and allows for safer iteration over the elements, preventing potential issues with word splitting or globbing.
The repository style guide also encourages the use of arrays for dynamic command construction, and this principle extends well to managing lists of values.
| ALL_STATUS_LABELS="status:available,status:queued,status:claimed,status:in-review,status:blocked,status:verify-failed,status:done" | |
| ALL_STATUS_LABELS=("status:available" "status:queued" "status:claimed" "status:in-review" "status:blocked" "status:verify-failed" "status:done") |
References
- The style guide recommends using bash arrays for dynamic command construction, which implies a preference for arrays over delimited strings for managing lists of items to avoid issues like word splitting and make iteration safer. (link)
…(t1035) The ALL_STATUS_LABELS constant was defined in the monolithic supervisor-helper.sh but dropped when code was split into issue-sync.sh module. Under set -euo pipefail, the unbound variable crashed sync_issue_status_label(), which blocked cmd_dispatch() from completing (dispatch hung during the cmd_transition -> sync_issue_status_label call chain). This was the root cause of workers never starting after t1031 merged — the dispatch function wrote metadata to the log but crashed before creating the dispatch script and launching the worker process.
3d58f2e to
72b7e97
Compare
🔍 Code Quality Report�[0;35m[MONITOR]�[0m Code Review Monitoring Report �[0;34m[INFO]�[0m Latest Quality Status: �[0;34m[INFO]�[0m Recent monitoring activity: 📈 Current Quality Metrics
Generated on: Fri Feb 13 15:00:23 UTC 2026 Generated by AI DevOps Framework Code Review Monitoring |
|



Summary
ALL_STATUS_LABELSconstant that was dropped during t1031 supervisor modularisationsync_issue_status_label()inissue-sync.shand Phase 8b reconciliation inpulse.shset -euo pipefail, the unbound variable crashedsync_issue_status_label(), which blockedcmd_dispatch()from completing — the dispatch function wrote metadata to the log but crashed before creating the dispatch script and launching the worker processworker_never_started:no_sentinelafter t1031 mergedTesting
~/.aidevops/agents/scripts/supervisor/issue-sync.shsupervisor-helper.sh dispatch t1032.1— worker started successfully (WORKER_STARTED sentinel present)sync_issue_status_labelRelated
Summary by CodeRabbit