fix: clarify pre-edit check is only for agents with edit tools#12
fix: clarify pre-edit check is only for agents with edit tools#12marcusquinn merged 1 commit intomainfrom
Conversation
Plan+ was attempting to run the pre-edit git check on conversation start, even though it's a read-only agent without Bash/Edit tools. Added explicit skip instruction for read-only agents.
|
Warning Rate limit exceeded@marcusquinn has exceeded the limit for the number of commits that can be reviewed per hour. Please wait 10 minutes and 43 seconds before requesting another review. ⌛ How to resolve this issue?After the wait time has elapsed, a review can be triggered using the We recommend that you space out your commits to avoid hitting the rate limit. 🚦 How do rate limits work?CodeRabbit enforces hourly rate limits for each developer per organization. Our paid plans have higher rate limits than the trial, open-source and free plans. In all cases, we re-allow further reviews after a brief timeout. Please see our FAQ for further information. 📒 Files selected for processing (1)
Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out. Comment |
Summary of ChangesHello @marcusquinn, I'm Gemini Code Assist1! I'm currently reviewing this pull request and will post my feedback shortly. In the meantime, here's a summary to help you and other reviewers quickly get up to speed! This pull request resolves an issue where read-only agents, specifically the Plan+ agent, were erroneously attempting to execute a pre-edit Git check that requires editing tools. This led to failures and disrupted the agent's initial workflow. The change introduces clear guidance within the agent's configuration documentation, instructing such agents to bypass this check, thereby ensuring smooth operation and preventing unnecessary errors for agents not equipped with write capabilities. Highlights
Using Gemini Code AssistThe full guide for Gemini Code Assist can be found on our documentation page, here are some quick tips. Invoking Gemini You can request assistance from Gemini at any point by creating a comment using either
Customization To customize Gemini Code Assist for GitHub experience, repository maintainers can create a configuration file and/or provide a custom code review style guide (such as PEP-8 for Python) by creating and adding files to a Limitations & Feedback Gemini Code Assist may make mistakes. Please leave feedback on any instances where its feedback is incorrect or counter productive. You can react with 👍 and 👎 on @gemini-code-assist comments. If you're interested in giving your feedback about your experience with Gemini Code Assist for Github and other Google products, sign up here. You can also get AI-powered code generation, chat, as well as code reviews directly in the IDE at no cost with the Gemini Code Assist IDE Extension. Footnotes
|
|
![gemini-code-assist[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/956858?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Code Review
This pull request aims to clarify instructions for AI agents, specifically to prevent read-only agents from attempting to run pre-edit checks they don't have the tools for. The change adds a note to skip the check, which correctly addresses the issue. My review includes a suggestion to refine the wording of this new instruction to make it even clearer and less ambiguous for the AI, ensuring it's interpreted correctly within the intended context.
| > **Skip this section if you don't have Edit/Write/Bash tools** (e.g., Plan+ agent). | ||
| > Read-only agents should proceed directly to responding to the user. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
For improved clarity and to reduce potential ambiguity for the AI agent, consider combining these two lines into a single, more direct instruction. The current second line, while well-intentioned, could be interpreted as a general rule for read-only agents outside the context of this specific section. A single, connected instruction is less ambiguous and more directly links the condition with the alternative action.
| > **Skip this section if you don't have Edit/Write/Bash tools** (e.g., Plan+ agent). | |
| > Read-only agents should proceed directly to responding to the user. | |
| > **Skip this section if you don't have Edit/Write/Bash tools** (e.g., Plan+ agent). Instead, proceed directly to responding to the user. |
🔍 Code Quality Report�[0;35m[MONITOR]�[0m Code Review Monitoring Report �[0;34m[INFO]�[0m Latest Quality Status: �[0;34m[INFO]�[0m Recent monitoring activity: 📈 Current Quality Metrics
Generated on: Wed Jan 7 21:44:10 UTC 2026 Generated by AI DevOps Framework Code Review Monitoring |
1 participant
Summary
Plan+ was attempting to run the pre-edit git check on conversation start, even though it's a read-only agent without Bash/Edit tools.
Problem
When starting a new Plan+ session, the agent would:
pre-edit-check.shFix
Added explicit skip instruction at the top of the Pre-Edit Git Check section: