Skip to content

Conversation

@marcusquinn
Copy link
Owner

@marcusquinn marcusquinn commented Jan 17, 2026

Summary

  • Plan+ can now write to planning files (TODO.md, todo/) without switching to Build+
  • Uses OpenCode's path-based permissions to restrict writes to planning paths only
  • Enables quick planning sessions where you can capture todos/tasks/plans directly

Changes

  • generate-opencode-agents.sh: Enable write/edit tools for Plan+ with path-based restrictions
  • plan-plus.md: Update documentation to reflect new capabilities

Use Case

  1. Open OpenCode with Plan+ as default agent
  2. Read and analyze the codebase (all files readable)
  3. Write todos/tasks/plans directly to TODO.md and todo/
  4. Switch to Build+ only when ready for code implementation

Permissions

"write": {
  "*": "deny",
  "TODO.md": "allow",
  "todo/*": "allow",
  "todo/**": "allow"
}

Testing

  • Verified opencode.json has correct permissions after setup.sh
  • Preflight checks pass (ShellCheck, Secretlint)

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • New Features

    • Plan+ agent can now write and edit planning files (TODO lists and planning directories).
    • Implemented path-based permission model for more granular access control.
  • Updates

    • Clarified Plan+ capabilities: planning file writes are allowed; code edits and script modifications remain prohibited.
    • Updated system guidance to reflect expanded planning phase permissions.

✏️ Tip: You can customize this high-level summary in your review settings.

Plan+ can now write to planning files without switching to Build+:
- TODO.md at project root
- todo/* and todo/** (PLANS.md, tasks/, PRDs)

This enables quick planning sessions where you can:
1. Open OpenCode with Plan+ as default agent
2. Read and analyze the codebase
3. Write todos/tasks/plans directly
4. Switch to Build+ only for code implementation

Changes:
- Enable write/edit tools for Plan+ (was disabled)
- Add path-based permissions restricting writes to planning paths
- Update plan-plus.md documentation to reflect new capabilities
- Keep bash disabled (no shell commands in Plan+)
@coderabbitai
Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented Jan 17, 2026

Warning

Rate limit exceeded

@marcusquinn has exceeded the limit for the number of commits that can be reviewed per hour. Please wait 6 minutes and 18 seconds before requesting another review.

⌛ How to resolve this issue?

After the wait time has elapsed, a review can be triggered using the @coderabbitai review command as a PR comment. Alternatively, push new commits to this PR.

We recommend that you space out your commits to avoid hitting the rate limit.

🚦 How do rate limits work?

CodeRabbit enforces hourly rate limits for each developer per organization.

Our paid plans have higher rate limits than the trial, open-source and free plans. In all cases, we re-allow further reviews after a brief timeout.

Please see our FAQ for further information.

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between d8c8c60 and 69ff810.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • .agent/plan-plus.md

Note

Other AI code review bot(s) detected

CodeRabbit has detected other AI code review bot(s) in this pull request and will avoid duplicating their findings in the review comments. This may lead to a less comprehensive review.

Walkthrough

The Plan+ agent's capabilities are expanded from read-only operations to include limited write access to planning files (TODO.md and todo/ directory), reflected in both the role documentation and configuration script permissions.

Changes

Cohort / File(s) Summary
Plan+ Agent Configuration
.agent/plan-plus.md, .agent/scripts/generate-opencode-agents.sh
Updated Plan+ from read-only to limited write-capable agent. Documentation shifted from "READ-ONLY phase" to "PLANNING phase with LIMITED write access." Configuration script changed AGENT_TOOLS flags (write/edit: False → True) and replaced flat deny permissions with path-based model allowing writes/edits to TODO.md, todo/\, todo/\\* while denying other paths.

Estimated code review effort

🎯 2 (Simple) | ⏱️ ~10 minutes

Possibly related PRs

Poem

📝 Plan+ breaks free from read-only chains,
Now writing plans to capture all remains,
TODO.md and todo/ paths bloom with grace,
Limited powers in their rightful place.

🚥 Pre-merge checks | ✅ 3
✅ Passed checks (3 passed)
Check name Status Explanation
Description Check ✅ Passed Check skipped - CodeRabbit’s high-level summary is enabled.
Title check ✅ Passed The title clearly and specifically describes the main change: adding path-based write permissions for the Plan+ agent, which aligns perfectly with the core modifications in both files.
Docstring Coverage ✅ Passed No functions found in the changed files to evaluate docstring coverage. Skipping docstring coverage check.

✏️ Tip: You can configure your own custom pre-merge checks in the settings.


Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share

Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands and usage tips.

@gemini-code-assist
Copy link

Summary of Changes

Hello @marcusquinn, I'm Gemini Code Assist1! I'm currently reviewing this pull request and will post my feedback shortly. In the meantime, here's a summary to help you and other reviewers quickly get up to speed!

This pull request significantly enhances the Plan+ agent's functionality by introducing controlled write access to planning-related files. Previously a read-only agent, Plan+ can now directly modify TODO.md and files within the todo/ directory, allowing users to capture plans and tasks without needing to switch to the Build+ agent. This change streamlines the planning phase, making it more efficient and integrated, while strictly enforcing path-based permissions to prevent unintended modifications to code or other system files.

Highlights

  • Enhanced Plan+ Agent Capabilities: The Plan+ agent can now write to specific planning files (TODO.md and files within the todo/ directory) without requiring a switch to the Build+ agent.
  • Path-Based Permissions Implemented: OpenCode's path-based permissions have been utilized to strictly control and limit the Plan+ agent's write and edit access exclusively to designated planning files, denying all other write operations.
  • Updated Documentation: The documentation for the Plan+ agent has been updated to clearly reflect its new write capabilities, allowed paths, and limitations, ensuring users are aware of its enhanced functionality.
Using Gemini Code Assist

The full guide for Gemini Code Assist can be found on our documentation page, here are some quick tips.

Invoking Gemini

You can request assistance from Gemini at any point by creating a comment using either /gemini <command> or @gemini-code-assist <command>. Below is a summary of the supported commands on the current page.

Feature Command Description
Code Review /gemini review Performs a code review for the current pull request in its current state.
Pull Request Summary /gemini summary Provides a summary of the current pull request in its current state.
Comment @gemini-code-assist Responds in comments when explicitly tagged, both in pull request comments and review comments.
Help /gemini help Displays a list of available commands.

Customization

To customize Gemini Code Assist for GitHub experience, repository maintainers can create a configuration file and/or provide a custom code review style guide (such as PEP-8 for Python) by creating and adding files to a .gemini/ folder in the base of the repository. Detailed instructions can be found here.

Limitations & Feedback

Gemini Code Assist may make mistakes. Please leave feedback on any instances where its feedback is incorrect or counter productive. You can react with 👍 and 👎 on @gemini-code-assist comments. If you're interested in giving your feedback about your experience with Gemini Code Assist for Github and other Google products, sign up here.

You can also get AI-powered code generation, chat, as well as code reviews directly in the IDE at no cost with the Gemini Code Assist IDE Extension.

Footnotes

  1. Review the Privacy Notices, Generative AI Prohibited Use Policy, Terms of Service, and learn how to configure Gemini Code Assist in GitHub here. Gemini can make mistakes, so double check it and use code with caution.

@github-actions
Copy link

🔍 Code Quality Report

�[0;35m[MONITOR]�[0m Code Review Monitoring Report

�[0;34m[INFO]�[0m Latest Quality Status:
SonarCloud: 0 bugs, 0 vulnerabilities, 262 code smells

�[0;34m[INFO]�[0m Recent monitoring activity:
Sat Jan 17 03:22:01 UTC 2026: Code review monitoring started
Sat Jan 17 03:22:02 UTC 2026: SonarCloud - Bugs: 0, Vulnerabilities: 0, Code Smells: 262
Sat Jan 17 03:22:02 UTC 2026: Qlty - 0 issues found, auto-formatting applied
Sat Jan 17 03:22:04 UTC 2026: Codacy analysis completed with auto-fixes

📈 Current Quality Metrics

  • BUGS: 0
  • CODE SMELLS: 262
  • VULNERABILITIES: 0

Generated on: Sat Jan 17 03:22:44 UTC 2026


Generated by AI DevOps Framework Code Review Monitoring

Copy link

@gemini-code-assist gemini-code-assist bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Code Review

This pull request effectively adds path-based write permissions for the Plan+ agent, allowing it to modify planning files like TODO.md and contents of the todo/ directory. The changes are well-implemented, enabling the write and edit tools and correctly configuring the permissions in generate-opencode-agents.sh. The accompanying documentation updates in plan-plus.md are clear and accurately reflect the new capabilities. I've included one suggestion to refactor the permission configuration to reduce code duplication, which will improve maintainability. Overall, this is a valuable enhancement to the planning workflow.

Comment on lines +281 to +298
# Plan+ can read all files, but only write/edit planning files
# Path-based permissions: deny by default, allow specific paths
config["permission"] = {
"bash": "deny",
"read": "allow",
"write": {
"*": "deny",
"TODO.md": "allow",
"todo/*": "allow",
"todo/**": "allow",
},
"edit": {
"*": "deny",
"TODO.md": "allow",
"todo/*": "allow",
"todo/**": "allow",
}
}

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

medium

To improve maintainability and reduce code duplication, you can define the path-based permissions for write and edit in a separate variable and reuse it. This makes it clear that both have the same permissions and simplifies future updates.

Suggested change
# Plan+ can read all files, but only write/edit planning files
# Path-based permissions: deny by default, allow specific paths
config["permission"] = {
"bash": "deny",
"read": "allow",
"write": {
"*": "deny",
"TODO.md": "allow",
"todo/*": "allow",
"todo/**": "allow",
},
"edit": {
"*": "deny",
"TODO.md": "allow",
"todo/*": "allow",
"todo/**": "allow",
}
}
# Plan+ can read all files, but only write/edit planning files
# Path-based permissions: deny by default, allow specific paths
write_edit_permissions = {
"*": "deny",
"TODO.md": "allow",
"todo/*": "allow",
"todo/**": "allow",
}
config["permission"] = {
"bash": "deny",
"read": "allow",
"write": write_edit_permissions,
"edit": write_edit_permissions,
}

@augmentcode
Copy link

augmentcode bot commented Jan 17, 2026

🤖 Augment PR Summary

Summary: This PR lets the Plan+ OpenCode agent write to planning artifacts without switching to Build+.

Changes:

  • Updated .agent/plan-plus.md to describe limited write access to TODO.md and todo/
  • Enabled Plan+ write/edit tools in the OpenCode agent generator
  • Added deny-by-default, path-based allowlists for Plan+ write and edit permissions (bash remains denied)
Technical Notes: Safety depends on OpenCode’s path-based permission maps to constrain writes to the planning paths only.

🤖 Was this summary useful? React with 👍 or 👎

Copy link

@augmentcode augmentcode bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Review completed. 3 suggestions posted.

Fix All in Augment

Comment augment review to trigger a new review at any time.

Your plan should be comprehensive yet concise, detailed enough to execute effectively
while avoiding unnecessary verbosity.

**You CAN write plans directly** to TODO.md and todo/ folder without switching agents.
Copy link

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This line enables limited writing, but the later “Output Constraints” section still says “Acknowledge read-only limitation” / “Never attempt writes,” which seems contradictory and may cause Plan+ to avoid using the new planning-file write capability.

Fix This in Augment

🤖 Was this useful? React with 👍 or 👎

# Read-only agent - no write/edit/bash
"write": False, "edit": False, "bash": False,
# Planning agent - read all, write only to planning files (via permissions), no bash
"write": True, "edit": True, "bash": False,
Copy link

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Since Plan+ now has write/edit tools enabled, it relies entirely on the path-based permission allowlist below; it’s worth keeping a small negative test in your validation workflow (e.g., attempt to write outside TODO.md/todo/**) to catch any schema/regression that would accidentally broaden access.

Fix This in Augment

🤖 Was this useful? React with 👍 or 👎

config["permission"] = {"edit": "deny", "write": "deny", "bash": "deny"}
# Plan+ can read all files, but only write/edit planning files
# Path-based permissions: deny by default, allow specific paths
config["permission"] = {
Copy link

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

After switching Plan+ away from strict read-only, consider updating .agent/tools/opencode/opencode.md (it currently documents Plan+ as “configured as strictly read-only”) so the repo’s OpenCode permission docs stay consistent with the generated config.

Fix This in Augment

🤖 Was this useful? React with 👍 or 👎

Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 0

Caution

Some comments are outside the diff and can’t be posted inline due to platform limitations.

⚠️ Outside diff range comments (1)
.agent/plan-plus.md (1)

56-71: Align Output Constraints with the new limited-write allowance.
The system reminder now permits writing to planning files, but the Output Constraints still say “read-only” and “Never attempt writes,” which conflicts and can mislead usage. Consider updating those lines to reflect limited write access (planning files only).

♻️ Suggested doc tweak
-2. **Acknowledge read-only limitation** - When you've designed something that
-   requires implementation, explicitly state: "This plan is ready for
-   implementation. Switch to Build+ (Tab) to create these files."
+2. **Acknowledge limited write access** - When you've designed something that
+   requires implementation beyond planning files, explicitly state:
+   "This plan is ready for implementation. Switch to Build+ (Tab) to create these files."

-3. **Never attempt writes** - If you catch yourself about to output full file
-   contents for the user to copy-paste, stop and summarize instead. The Build+
-   agent can generate the actual content.
+3. **Never attempt writes outside planning files** - If you catch yourself about
+   to output full file contents for the user to copy-paste, stop and summarize
+   instead. The Build+ agent can generate the actual content.
🧹 Nitpick comments (1)
.agent/scripts/generate-opencode-agents.sh (1)

281-298: OpenCode schema supports nested path permissions with glob patterns—refactor to eliminate duplication.

The Plan+ permission configuration is syntactically correct; OpenCode fully supports nested write/edit paths with glob patterns (TODO.md, todo/*, todo/**). However, duplicating the same path list across both write and edit blocks creates drift risk. Extract once and reuse to keep them in sync.

♻️ DRY refactor
-        config["permission"] = {
-            "bash": "deny",
-            "read": "allow",
-            "write": {
-                "*": "deny",
-                "TODO.md": "allow",
-                "todo/*": "allow",
-                "todo/**": "allow",
-            },
-            "edit": {
-                "*": "deny",
-                "TODO.md": "allow",
-                "todo/*": "allow",
-                "todo/**": "allow",
-            }
-        }
+        planning_paths = ["TODO.md", "todo/*", "todo/**"]
+        planning_perms = {"*": "deny", **{p: "allow" for p in planning_paths}}
+        config["permission"] = {
+            "bash": "deny",
+            "read": "allow",
+            "write": planning_perms.copy(),
+            "edit": planning_perms.copy(),
+        }

- Add clear guidance on when and how to hand off to Build+
- Document what Plan+ can write (TODO.md, todo/) vs cannot (code files)
- Add example handoff message format
- Reinforce in system reminder that code writes will be denied
@sonarqubecloud
Copy link

@github-actions
Copy link

🔍 Code Quality Report

�[0;35m[MONITOR]�[0m Code Review Monitoring Report

�[0;34m[INFO]�[0m Latest Quality Status:
SonarCloud: 0 bugs, 0 vulnerabilities, 262 code smells

�[0;34m[INFO]�[0m Recent monitoring activity:
Sat Jan 17 03:29:22 UTC 2026: Code review monitoring started
Sat Jan 17 03:29:23 UTC 2026: SonarCloud - Bugs: 0, Vulnerabilities: 0, Code Smells: 262
Sat Jan 17 03:29:23 UTC 2026: Qlty - 0 issues found, auto-formatting applied
Sat Jan 17 03:29:25 UTC 2026: Codacy analysis completed with auto-fixes

📈 Current Quality Metrics

  • BUGS: 0
  • CODE SMELLS: 262
  • VULNERABILITIES: 0

Generated on: Sat Jan 17 03:30:06 UTC 2026


Generated by AI DevOps Framework Code Review Monitoring

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant