Skip to content

Conversation

@marcusquinn
Copy link
Owner

Summary

Fixes the deploying->deployed transition stuck state issue where tasks would remain in 'deploying' status for 10-13 minutes before auto-recovery.

Changes

  1. Reduced Phase 4d timeout from 600s (10min) to 120s (2min) for faster recovery
  2. Added retry logic with exponential backoff (3 attempts: 0s, 1s, 3s) to both:
    • Initial deploying->deployed transition after merge (Step 4)
    • Auto-recovery transition in Phase 4b
  3. Added better error logging to capture transition failure reasons
  4. Tasks now recover within 2-4 minutes instead of 10-13 minutes

Root Cause

  • cmd_transition failures were logged with || log_warn but not retried
  • Silent failures left tasks stuck until Phase 4d timeout (10min)
  • DB write errors or process interruptions during transition caused the issue

Evidence from This Session

  • t241: 13min delay (19:18:35 -> 19:31:33)
  • t240: 2.5min delay (19:31:44 -> 19:34:09)
  • t242: 1.5min delay (19:32:37 -> 19:34:09)

Testing

  • Syntax validation: bash -n passed
  • The fix adds retry logic that will automatically recover from transient failures
  • Phase 4d now triggers after 2 minutes instead of 10 minutes
  • Error messages are now captured and logged for debugging

Files Modified

  • .agents/scripts/supervisor-helper.sh (lines 8385-8420, 8404-8465, 9051-9057)

Closes #248

Improvements:
1. Reduced Phase 4d timeout from 600s (10min) to 120s (2min) for faster recovery
2. Added retry logic with exponential backoff (3 attempts: 0s, 1s, 3s) to both:
   - Initial deploying->deployed transition after merge (Step 4)
   - Auto-recovery transition in Phase 4b
3. Added better error logging to capture transition failure reasons
4. Tasks now recover within 2-4 minutes instead of 10-13 minutes

Root cause:
- cmd_transition failures were logged but not retried
- Silent failures left tasks stuck until Phase 4d timeout (10min)
- DB write errors or process interruptions during transition

Evidence from this session:
- t241: 13min delay (19:18:35 -> 19:31:33)
- t240: 2.5min delay (19:31:44 -> 19:34:09)
- t242: 1.5min delay (19:32:37 -> 19:34:09)

Files modified:
- .agents/scripts/supervisor-helper.sh (lines 8385-8420, 8404-8465, 9051-9057)
@gemini-code-assist
Copy link

Warning

You have reached your daily quota limit. Please wait up to 24 hours and I will start processing your requests again!

@coderabbitai
Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented Feb 10, 2026

Warning

Rate limit exceeded

@marcusquinn has exceeded the limit for the number of commits that can be reviewed per hour. Please wait 5 minutes and 27 seconds before requesting another review.

⌛ How to resolve this issue?

After the wait time has elapsed, a review can be triggered using the @coderabbitai review command as a PR comment. Alternatively, push new commits to this PR.

We recommend that you space out your commits to avoid hitting the rate limit.

🚦 How do rate limits work?

CodeRabbit enforces hourly rate limits for each developer per organization.

Our paid plans have higher rate limits than the trial, open-source and free plans. In all cases, we re-allow further reviews after a brief timeout.

Please see our FAQ for further information.

✨ Finishing touches
🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)
  • Create PR with unit tests
  • Post copyable unit tests in a comment
  • Commit unit tests in branch feature/t248

Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share

Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands and usage tips.

@github-actions
Copy link

🔍 Code Quality Report

�[0;35m[MONITOR]�[0m Code Review Monitoring Report

�[0;34m[INFO]�[0m Latest Quality Status:
SonarCloud: 0 bugs, 0 vulnerabilities, 46 code smells

�[0;34m[INFO]�[0m Recent monitoring activity:
Tue Feb 10 23:15:27 UTC 2026: Code review monitoring started
Tue Feb 10 23:15:28 UTC 2026: SonarCloud - Bugs: 0, Vulnerabilities: 0, Code Smells: 46

📈 Current Quality Metrics

  • BUGS: 0
  • CODE SMELLS: 46
  • VULNERABILITIES: 0

Generated on: Tue Feb 10 23:15:30 UTC 2026


Generated by AI DevOps Framework Code Review Monitoring

@sonarqubecloud
Copy link

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant