-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 122
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Add methods to find consistent UBs and optimise goniometer axes and angles in ISIS single-crystal classes #37599
Add methods to find consistent UBs and optimise goniometer axes and angles in ISIS single-crystal classes #37599
Conversation
Required to retrieve angles passed in SetGoniometer
Input to method to find goniometer axis
👋 Hi, @RichardWaiteSTFC, Conflicts have been detected against the base branch. Please rebase your branch against the base branch. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
LGTM, I tried the script and it works as expected. Also, the good looks code to me.
Could you just resolve the merge conflict and then I will approve
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
LGTM
Description of work
This PR adds 2 features:
Fixes #35713 - albeit with different solution (doesn't change
FindGoniometerFromUB
algorithm)Fixes #36907
Further detail of work
To test:
(1) To test making a set of consistent UBs
The UBs should be very similar but maybe the 2nd or 3rd decimal point will be different.
(2) Optimise the goniometer axis and angles
Reviewer
Please comment on the points listed below (full description).
Your comments will be used as part of the gatekeeper process, so please comment clearly on what you have checked during your review. If changes are made to the PR during the review process then your final comment will be the most important for gatekeepers. In this comment you should make it clear why any earlier review is still valid, or confirm that all requested changes have been addressed.
Code Review
Functional Tests
Does everything look good? Mark the review as Approve. A member of
@mantidproject/gatekeepers
will take care of it.Gatekeeper
If you need to request changes to a PR then please add a comment and set the review status to "Request changes". This will stop the PR from showing up in the list for other gatekeepers.