Skip to content

base red: avatar capability text names the daemon operation (cx-qh5q6, cx-qvwnn) - #20740

Merged
teamleaderleo merged 1 commit into
feat-cmux-nextfrom
op-next-cursors/base-red-avatar-capability
Oct 14, 2026
Merged

teamleaderleo merged 1 commit into
feat-cmux-nextfrom
op-next-cursors/base-red-avatar-capability

Conversation

@teamleaderleo

@teamleaderleo teamleaderleo commented Oct 14, 2026 •

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

Fixes two feat base reds in cmux-next checks: Capability texts never say update the app (bead cx-qh5q6) and Script tests (pin-cmux-tui, embed-cef, ensure-cef store) (bead cx-qvwnn). The script-tests step also runs capability-text.test.sh, which lints the whole repository, so it was red for the same text. On base, every other script in that step passes locally.

The base red comes from 086bc32. When the daemon lacks participant.avatar.*, cmux avatar told the user to "update cmux" in English and Japanese. The version-skew rule says a capability error names the matching CLI or one exact command, so this rewords it the way chief/registry.rs does: it needs a newer cmux daemon with the participant.avatar operations; stop the daemon and run the command again. Text only, no behavior change.

Red / green

python3 scripts/cmux-next/check-capability-text.py --root .

  • base 8ba7816: flags avatar.rs:33 and :42
  • this head: capability texts: no 'update the app/daemon' advice

bash scripts/cmux-next/tests/capability-text.test.sh

  • base: FAIL: the repository has capability texts that say update
  • this head: capability-text tests: ok

Changelog

none

🤖 Generated with Claude Code

086bc32 told the user to "update cmux" when the daemon lacks
participant.avatar.*, which the capability-text check refuses (version
skew names the matching CLI or one exact command). Reword it the way
chief/registry.rs does: a newer daemon with the named operations, stop
it and run the command again. Text only.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
@cursor

cursor Bot commented Oct 14, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Bugbot needs on-demand usage enabled

Bugbot uses usage-based billing for this team and requires on-demand usage to be enabled.

A team admin can enable on-demand usage in the Cursor dashboard.

@teamleaderleo
teamleaderleo temporarily deployed to cmux-tui-merge-tree October 14, 2026 21:16 — with GitHub Actions Inactive
@coderabbitai

coderabbitai Bot commented Oct 14, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Important

Review skipped

Auto reviews are disabled on base/target branches other than the default branch.

Please check the settings in the CodeRabbit UI or the .coderabbit.yaml file in this repository. To trigger a single review, invoke the @coderabbitai review command.

⚙️ Run configuration
  • Configuration used: Repository: manaflow-ai/cmux/.coderabbit.yaml
  • Review profile: ASSERTIVE
  • Plan: Advanced
  • Run ID: d804a3f0-23d4-4538-8f10-2b7b05fdeb21

You can disable this status message by setting the reviews.review_status to false in the CodeRabbit configuration file.

Use the checkbox below for a quick retry:

  • 🔍 Trigger review
  • Autofix · Keep fixing CodeRabbit findings and required CI, and resolving merge conflicts

Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share

Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands.

@teamleaderleo teamleaderleo changed the title base red: avatar capability text names the daemon operation (cx-qh5q6) base red: avatar capability text names the daemon operation (cx-qh5q6, cx-qvwnn) Oct 14, 2026
@teamleaderleo
teamleaderleo merged commit 8ae8e3b into feat-cmux-next Oct 14, 2026
132 of 135 checks passed
@teamleaderleo
teamleaderleo deleted the op-next-cursors/base-red-avatar-capability branch October 14, 2026 21:55

This branch was previously deployed

2 inactive deployments
artifacts — f5a23f71 Deployed Oct 14, 2026 by teamleaderleo via publish tree-addressed cmux-tui #14820
cmux-tui-merge-tree — f5a23f71 Deployed Oct 14, 2026 by teamleaderleo via publish the merge tree #969
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant