Repository navigation
Require Computer Use onboarding wiring - #13627
Conversation
|
Navigate logical layers of code changes, visualize relationships, and explore their blast radius. No actionable comments were generated in the recent review. 🎉 ℹ️ Recent review info⚙️ Run configurationConfiguration used: Repository: manaflow-ai/cmux/.coderabbit.yaml Review profile: ASSERTIVE Plan: Advanced Run ID: 📒 Files selected for processing (5)
💤 Files with no reviewable changes (1)
Included review availability: Your plan provides up to 10 included reviews per hour; 3 remain after this review. 📝 WalkthroughWalkthrough
ChangesComputer-use onboarding wiring
Priority: ⬇️ Low Estimated code review effort: 2 (Simple) | ~10 minutes Change: Other Merge Risk: ⚪ Minimal · up to This change wires Settings-triggered computer-use onboarding through application construction and adds coverage for its starting points. No remaining merge-blocking risk is identified. 🚥 Pre-merge checks | ✅ 23 | ❌ 2❌ Failed checks (2 warnings)
✅ Passed checks (23 passed)
Full details: Description checkExplanation The description explains the problem and resulting dependency change, but it does not follow the repository template. It omits the required Summary, Testing, Demo Video, Review Trigger, and Checklist sections, and it does not provide completed test results. Resolution Update the description to use the required template sections. Add concrete completed test commands and results, provide a demo video or attachment for this behavior change, include the review-trigger comment block, and complete the checklist. Reconcile the description with the actual implementation and PR objective if they differ more than intended.
✨ Finishing Touches 💡 1📝 Generate docstrings 💡
🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)
Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out. Comment |
|
All contributors have signed the CLA ✍️ ✅ |
Bugbot is paused — on-demand spend limit reachedBugbot uses usage-based billing for this team and has hit its on-demand spend limit. A team admin can raise the spend limit in the Cursor dashboard, or wait for the next billing cycle to continue. |
0437d0c to
fffdc72
Compare
Problem
HostSettingsActionspreviously carried a default no-op Computer Use onboarding callback. Production patched that callback later fromAppDelegate.configure(), while tests could inject it manually. That let the host wiring disappear without making construction fail.Result
The onboarding action is now a required
HostSettingsActionsinitializer dependency.ComputerUseUXCoordinator.presentOnboardingFromSettings(startingAt:)route at composition time;The composition now makes the dependency explicit: a production
HostSettingsActionsinstance cannot be created while omitting Computer Use onboarding routing.Validation
Focused app-host/CI checks are running on the repaired head. No runtime behavior is intentionally changed; this turns an existing host connection into a required dependency and pins the behavior through executable paths.
Related: #13599.
Summary by CodeRabbit
Bug Fixes
Refactor