Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[PE-93] regression: mentions in space app, entity search #6250

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Dec 20, 2024

Conversation

aaryan610
Copy link
Collaborator

@aaryan610 aaryan610 commented Dec 20, 2024

Description

  1. Removed redirection from space app mentions.
  2. Updated filter logic for entity search endpoint.

Type of Change

  • Bug fix (non-breaking change which fixes an issue)

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • New Features

    • User mentions now display as plain text prefixed with "@" instead of clickable links in the editor component.
  • Bug Fixes

    • Simplified filtering logic for user mentions in search functionality, enhancing readability and maintainability.
  • Documentation

    • Updated component behavior documentation to reflect changes in user mention presentation.

@aaryan610 aaryan610 added this to the v0.24.0 milestone Dec 20, 2024
Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented Dec 20, 2024

Walkthrough

The pull request introduces modifications to two files: apiserver/plane/app/views/search/base.py and space/core/components/editor/embeds/mentions/user.tsx. In the search endpoint, the filtering logic for user mentions has been simplified by integrating the user check into the Q object. In the frontend component, the user mention display has been changed from a clickable link to plain text, removing dependencies on Next.js navigation and link components.

Changes

File Change Summary
apiserver/plane/app/views/search/base.py Simplified user mention filtering in SearchEndpoint.get() method by integrating user check into Q object
space/core/components/editor/embeds/mentions/user.tsx Removed Link and useParams dependencies, changed user mention display from clickable link to plain text with "@" prefix

Possibly related PRs

Suggested labels

🐛bug, 🌐frontend

Suggested reviewers

  • SatishGandham
  • Palanikannan1437

Poem

🐰 Mentions dancing light and free,
No more links, just text to see
Backend queries, frontend clean
A rabbit's code, a subtle scene!
Simplicity reigns supreme 🔍

Tip

CodeRabbit's docstrings feature is now available as part of our Early Access Program! Simply use the command @coderabbitai generate docstrings to have CodeRabbit automatically generate docstrings for your pull request. We would love to hear your feedback on Discord.


Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

❤️ Share
🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai generate docstrings to generate docstrings for this PR. (Beta)
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

@aaryan610 aaryan610 changed the title [PE-93] regression: mentions in space app [PE-93] regression: mentions in space app, entity search Dec 20, 2024
Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 0

🧹 Nitpick comments (1)
space/core/components/editor/embeds/mentions/user.tsx (1)

33-33: Consider adding visual hover state for mentions

While removing the link functionality aligns with the PR objectives, consider adding a hover state to maintain visual feedback that this is an interactive element representing a user.

-      @{userDetails?.member__display_name}
+      <span className="hover:text-yellow-600 transition-colors">
+        @{userDetails?.member__display_name}
+      </span>
📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between d2c0940 and 2fe40d4.

📒 Files selected for processing (2)
  • apiserver/plane/app/views/search/base.py (1 hunks)
  • space/core/components/editor/embeds/mentions/user.tsx (1 hunks)
🔇 Additional comments (2)
apiserver/plane/app/views/search/base.py (2)

277-277: LGTM: Filter optimization maintains security scope

The simplified filter condition maintains proper access control through:

  • Project membership check (project_id=project_id)
  • Workspace scope verification (workspace__slug=slug)
  • Active status validation (is_active=True)

277-277: Verify mention behavior across the application

Let's ensure the updated mention behavior is consistent across the application.

✅ Verification successful

Let me try a different approach to verify the mention behavior and filtering consistency.


Let me try one final verification to check the broader context of the search functionality.


Based on the verification results, I can now provide a final response:

The mention filtering implementation is consistent with project security patterns

The filtering pattern workspace__slug=slug, project_id=project_id, is_active=True is consistently used across the codebase for project-scoped queries, ensuring proper access control. The mention query correctly maintains workspace and project context while filtering active project members.

🏁 Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check for any remaining navigation-related code for mentions
# and verify consistent filter usage across the codebase

# Check for any remaining mention-related navigation code
echo "Checking for remaining mention navigation code..."
rg -l "Link.*?@.*?mention" --type=typescript

# Check for consistent filter pattern usage in other search endpoints
echo "Checking for consistent filter pattern usage..."
ast-grep --pattern 'ProjectMember.objects.filter($$$member=self.request.user$$$)'

Length of output: 379


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Check mention-related code and filtering patterns

# Search for mention-related code in Python files
echo "Searching for mention handling patterns..."
rg -A 5 "@mention" 

# Check filter patterns in search-related files
echo "Checking filter patterns in search views..."
fd "search.*\.py" --exec rg -A 3 "filter\(.*project_id.*workspace.*slug"

# Look for other instances of similar filtering logic
echo "Checking similar filtering patterns..."
rg -A 3 "is_active=True, project_id=.*workspace.*slug"

Length of output: 782


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Check the complete search view implementation

# Display the content of the search base file
echo "Checking search base implementation..."
cat apiserver/plane/app/views/search/base.py

# Look for related search view files
echo "Finding related search view files..."
fd "search.*\.py" --type f

# Check for workspace and project filtering patterns in other views
echo "Checking similar filtering patterns in other views..."
rg -B 2 -A 2 "workspace__slug=slug.*project_id=project_id"

Length of output: 49509

@pushya22 pushya22 merged commit 33acb9e into preview Dec 20, 2024
12 of 14 checks passed
@pushya22 pushya22 deleted the fix/mentions branch December 20, 2024 11:26
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants