Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

improvement: build action improvement #6248

Open
wants to merge 2 commits into
base: preview
Choose a base branch
from
Open

Conversation

mguptahub
Copy link
Collaborator

@mguptahub mguptahub commented Dec 20, 2024

Description

Branch Build updated to use the reusable action makeplane/actions/[email protected]

This avoids the additional checkout step for each job.

Type of Change

  • Bug fix (non-breaking change which fixes an issue)
  • Feature (non-breaking change which adds functionality)
  • Improvement (change that would cause existing functionality to not work as expected)
  • Code refactoring
  • Performance improvements
  • Documentation update

Screenshots and Media (if applicable)

Test Scenarios

References

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • Chores
    • Removed the GitHub Action for building and pushing Docker images.
    • Updated the build environment from Ubuntu 20.04 to Ubuntu 22.04.
    • Renamed parameters for clarity in the build workflow.
    • Switched to a remote action for building and pushing Docker images to enhance maintainability.

Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented Dec 20, 2024

Walkthrough

This pull request involves removing a custom GitHub Action for Docker image building and updating the branch build workflow. The changes include upgrading the Ubuntu environment from version 20.04 to 22.04, renaming Docker-related credentials parameters, and switching from a local build action to a remote action from the makeplane repository. The modifications aim to streamline the Docker image build and push process across multiple components.

Changes

File Change Summary
.github/actions/build-push-ce/action.yml Removed custom GitHub Action for Docker image building
.github/workflows/build-branch.yml - Upgraded Ubuntu version from 20.04 to 22.04
- Renamed Docker credentials parameters
- Replaced local build action with remote action makeplane/actions/[email protected]

Possibly related PRs

Suggested labels

🌐frontend, 🧹chore

Poem

🐰 Builds hop along, actions renew,
Ubuntu's version gets a fresh view
Docker images dance with glee
From local paths to remote spree
A workflow's journey, smooth and light! 🚀


📜 Recent review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 00624ea and d44e175.

📒 Files selected for processing (2)
  • .github/actions/build-push-ce/action.yml (0 hunks)
  • .github/workflows/build-branch.yml (9 hunks)
💤 Files with no reviewable changes (1)
  • .github/actions/build-push-ce/action.yml
🔇 Additional comments (5)
.github/workflows/build-branch.yml (5)

39-39: LGTM: Environment upgrade to Ubuntu 22.04

The consistent upgrade to Ubuntu 22.04 LTS across all jobs is a good practice for maintaining an up-to-date and secure build environment.

Also applies to: 163-163, 186-186, 209-209, 232-232, 255-255, 278-278, 301-301, 326-326


Line range hint 301-367: LGTM: Release process maintains robustness

The release process maintains its robustness with:

  • Proper semantic version validation
  • Comprehensive asset attachment
  • Appropriate use of GitHub's release creation API

Line range hint 39-367: Verify workflow consistency and dependencies

The workflow has complex conditional logic and multiple similar jobs. Let's verify:

  1. Job dependency chains are correct
  2. Build triggers are appropriate
✅ Verification successful

Based on the shell script results, I can now provide the final verification response:

Workflow dependencies and triggers are properly configured

The verification shows:

  1. All build jobs consistently depend on branch_build_setup job
  2. Build triggers follow a uniform pattern across all services:
    • Triggered when specific service files change (build_* output)
    • Triggered on workflow dispatch
    • Triggered for master branch
  3. Release-related jobs correctly depend on build type being "Release"
🏁 Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Analyze workflow structure and dependencies

# Check for consistent job dependencies
rg -A 5 'needs: \[' .github/workflows/build-branch.yml

# Check for consistent conditional triggers
rg 'if: \$\{\{ needs\.branch_build_setup\.outputs' .github/workflows/build-branch.yml

Length of output: 2823


167-167: Verify the remote action's stability and features

The switch to makeplane/actions/[email protected] across all build jobs promotes consistency. However, we should verify:

  1. The action's stability and maintenance status
  2. Feature parity with the previous local action

Also applies to: 190-190, 213-213, 236-236, 259-259, 282-282

✅ Verification successful

Remote action verified as stable and feature-complete

The makeplane/actions/[email protected] action has been verified:

  • Released on December 20, 2024, as a stable v1.0.0 release
  • Includes comprehensive Docker build & push functionality:
    • Multi-platform build support via Buildx
    • Smart tagging system for releases and branches
    • Support for both DockerHub and private registry authentication
    • Configurable build arguments and context
  • Actively maintained with recent commits showing bug fixes and improvements
🏁 Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify the remote action's repository and version

# Check if the action exists and its latest release
gh api \
  -H "Accept: application/vnd.github+json" \
  repos/makeplane/actions/releases/latest

# Check the action's workflow usage in other repositories
gh api graphql -f query='
query {
  search(query: "path:.github/workflows makeplane/actions/[email protected]", type: CODE, first: 10) {
    nodes {
      ... on TextMatch {
        repository {
          nameWithOwner
        }
      }
    }
  }
}'

Length of output: 4072


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Let's verify the action's content and implementation
gh api \
  -H "Accept: application/vnd.github+json" \
  repos/makeplane/actions/contents/build-push/action.yml

# Let's also check if there are any recent commits to ensure active maintenance
gh api \
  -H "Accept: application/vnd.github+json" \
  repos/makeplane/actions/commits?path=build-push&per_page=5

Length of output: 22129


172-173: Impact: Credential parameter renaming requires configuration updates

The renaming of Docker credentials from docker-username/docker-token to dockerhub-username/dockerhub-token improves clarity but requires updates to CI/CD configurations.

Also applies to: 195-196, 218-219, 241-242, 264-265, 287-288


Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

❤️ Share
🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai generate docstrings to generate docstrings for this PR. (Beta)
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant