Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[WEB-2568] chore: minor improvements related to issue identifier and issue modal. #5723

Merged
merged 3 commits into from
Sep 30, 2024

Conversation

prateekshourya29
Copy link
Member

@prateekshourya29 prateekshourya29 commented Sep 30, 2024

Summary by CodeRabbit

Release Notes

  • New Features

    • Introduced the IssueTypeSwitcher component for enhanced issue type management.
    • Added conditional rendering for the CreateUpdateIssueModal based on the isOpen state.
    • Expanded module exports to include issue-type-switcher for better accessibility.
  • Improvements

    • Enhanced session recorder script insertion logic for better robustness.
    • Streamlined issue detail fetching and form submission processes.
  • Bug Fixes

    • Improved handling of the isSubmitting state across various components.
  • Documentation

    • Updated props and component interfaces to reflect new functionalities and conditions.

Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented Sep 30, 2024

Walkthrough

The pull request introduces several modifications across multiple files, primarily focusing on enhancing the session recorder's script insertion logic and integrating a new IssueTypeSwitcher component. The changes include conditionally rendering components based on specific props, updating existing component structures, and adding new export statements to improve module accessibility. Additionally, the logic for fetching issue details has been adjusted to allow for more flexible handling based on component usage contexts.

Changes

File Path Change Summary
web/app/layout.tsx Modified session recorder script insertion logic to check for the existence of the first script tag before insertion.
web/ce/components/issues/issue-details/index.ts Added export for issue-type-switcher component.
web/ce/components/issues/issue-details/issue-type-switcher.tsx Introduced IssueTypeSwitcher component with props for issueId and disabled, utilizing the useIssueDetail hook.
web/core/components/issues/issue-detail/main-content.tsx Replaced IssueIdentifier with IssueTypeSwitcher, adjusting layout and conditional rendering based on issue state.
web/core/components/issues/issue-modal/base.tsx Added fetchIssueDetails prop to control API calls for fetching issue details.
web/core/components/issues/issue-modal/form.tsx Updated form submission logic to simplify handling of type_id and enhance clarity in the submission process.
web/core/components/issues/issue-modal/modal.tsx Updated to conditionally render modal based on isOpen prop and added fetchIssueDetails to IssuesModalProps.
web/core/components/issues/peek-overview/issue-detail.tsx Replaced IssueIdentifier with IssueTypeSwitcher, maintaining existing logic for title and description editing.
web/ee/components/issues/issue-details/index.ts Added export for issue-type-switcher component.
web/ee/components/issues/issue-details/issue-type-switcher.tsx Re-exported all entities from the ce/components/issues/issue-details/issue-type-switcher module.

Possibly related PRs

Suggested labels

🌐frontend, 🧹chore, 🎨UI / UX

Suggested reviewers

  • sriramveeraghanta
  • SatishGandham
  • rahulramesha

Poem

In the garden where issues bloom,
A switcher hops to dispel the gloom.
With scripts that dance and props that play,
Enhancements sprout in a bright array.
A bunny's cheer for changes made,
In code we trust, our plans displayed! 🐇✨


📜 Recent review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL

📥 Commits

Files that changed from the base of the PR and between 9e43ae6 and 131e897.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • web/app/layout.tsx (1 hunks)
🚧 Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (1)
  • web/app/layout.tsx

Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

❤️ Share
🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 0

🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (7)
web/ce/components/issues/issue-details/index.ts (1)

1-3: LGTM! Consider sorting exports alphabetically.

The addition of the issue-type-switcher export aligns with the PR objective of making minor improvements related to the issue modal. This change enhances the module's interface by including a new component without altering the existing exports.

As a minor suggestion, consider sorting the exports alphabetically for better readability and easier maintenance:

export * from "./issue-identifier";
export * from "./issue-properties-activity";
export * from "./issue-type-switcher";
web/ee/components/issues/issue-details/index.ts (1)

1-3: LGTM! Consider grouping related exports.

The addition of the issue-type-switcher export aligns with the PR objective of making minor improvements related to the issue modal. The change is straightforward and maintains consistency with the existing export statements.

Consider grouping related exports together for better organization. For example:

// Issue-related exports
export * from "./issue-identifier";
export * from "./issue-type-switcher";

// Activity-related exports
export * from "./issue-properties-activity";

This grouping can improve readability and make it easier to manage related exports as the file grows.

web/ce/components/issues/issue-details/issue-type-switcher.tsx (2)

7-10: Type definition is clear, but disabled prop is unused.

The TIssueTypeSwitcherProps type is well-defined and follows TypeScript naming conventions. However, the disabled prop is not used in the current implementation of the IssueTypeSwitcher component.

Consider removing the disabled prop if it's not needed, or implement its functionality in the component if it's intended to be used.


12-24: Component implementation is good, but consider error handling and unused props.

The IssueTypeSwitcher component is well-implemented, using MobX for state management and handling cases where the issue might not exist. However, there are a few points to consider:

  1. The disabled prop is defined in the type but not used in the component.
  2. There's no explicit handling of loading states or errors from getIssueById.
  3. The component returns an empty fragment when conditions are not met, which might not be ideal for all use cases.

Consider the following improvements:

  1. Remove the disabled prop if it's not needed, or implement its functionality.
  2. Add error and loading state handling:
export const IssueTypeSwitcher: React.FC<TIssueTypeSwitcherProps> = observer((props) => {
  const { issueId, disabled } = props;
  const {
    issue: { getIssueById },
    issueDetails: { loading, error },
  } = useIssueDetail();

  const issue = getIssueById(issueId);

  if (loading) return <div>Loading...</div>;
  if (error) return <div>Error: {error.message}</div>;
  if (!issue || !issue.project_id) return null;

  return (
    <IssueIdentifier
      issueId={issueId}
      projectId={issue.project_id}
      size="md"
      disabled={disabled}
    />
  );
});

This implementation handles loading and error states, uses the disabled prop, and returns null instead of an empty fragment when the issue is not found.

web/core/components/issues/issue-modal/modal.tsx (2)

22-22: LGTM! Consider adding documentation for the new prop.

The addition of the optional fetchIssueDetails prop is a good improvement, allowing for more flexibility in the component's behavior.

Consider adding a brief comment explaining the purpose and usage of this new prop to improve code maintainability.


25-32: LGTM! Consider memoizing the component for potential performance gains.

The update to conditionally render the modal based on the isOpen prop is a good improvement. It prevents unnecessary rendering when the modal is closed, which can lead to better performance.

Consider memoizing the component using React.memo to potentially prevent unnecessary re-renders:

-export const CreateUpdateIssueModal: React.FC<IssuesModalProps> = observer(
+export const CreateUpdateIssueModal: React.FC<IssuesModalProps> = React.memo(observer(
   (props) =>
     props.isOpen && (
       <IssueModalProvider>
         <CreateUpdateIssueModalBase {...props} />
       </IssueModalProvider>
     )
-);
+));

This optimization could be beneficial if the parent component re-renders frequently with the same props for this modal.

web/core/components/issues/issue-detail/main-content.tsx (1)

69-72: Approved: Improved layout and functionality

The changes to the JSX structure improve the UI by grouping related components (IssueTypeSwitcher and IssueUpdateStatus) within a flex container. The conditional disabling of IssueTypeSwitcher based on isArchived and isEditable props is a good practice for controlling user interactions.

These modifications align well with the PR objectives of making minor improvements related to the issue identifier and modal.

Consider adding a brief comment explaining the purpose of the new layout, especially regarding the replacement of IssueIdentifier with IssueTypeSwitcher. This would help future developers understand the reasoning behind this change.

+        {/* Group issue type switcher and update status for better UX */}
         <div className="mb-2.5 flex items-center justify-between gap-4">
           <IssueTypeSwitcher issueId={issueId} disabled={isArchived || !isEditable} />
           <IssueUpdateStatus isSubmitting={isSubmitting} />
         </div>
📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL

📥 Commits

Files that changed from the base of the PR and between b1dccf3 and 9e43ae6.

📒 Files selected for processing (10)
  • web/app/layout.tsx (1 hunks)
  • web/ce/components/issues/issue-details/index.ts (1 hunks)
  • web/ce/components/issues/issue-details/issue-type-switcher.tsx (1 hunks)
  • web/core/components/issues/issue-detail/main-content.tsx (2 hunks)
  • web/core/components/issues/issue-modal/base.tsx (2 hunks)
  • web/core/components/issues/issue-modal/form.tsx (1 hunks)
  • web/core/components/issues/issue-modal/modal.tsx (1 hunks)
  • web/core/components/issues/peek-overview/issue-detail.tsx (2 hunks)
  • web/ee/components/issues/issue-details/index.ts (1 hunks)
  • web/ee/components/issues/issue-details/issue-type-switcher.tsx (1 hunks)
🔇 Additional comments (12)
web/ee/components/issues/issue-details/issue-type-switcher.tsx (1)

1-1: LGTM! Well-structured module export.

This re-export is a clean way to make the community edition component available in the enterprise edition context. It promotes code reuse and allows for potential extension or overriding in the enterprise edition if needed.

Benefits of this approach:

  1. Encapsulation: It hides the internal structure of the 'ce' module.
  2. Flexibility: Allows for easy extension or replacement of the 'ce' component in the 'ee' version if required in the future.
  3. Consistency: Maintains a clear separation between 'ce' and 'ee' components while allowing seamless usage.
web/ce/components/issues/issue-details/issue-type-switcher.tsx (1)

1-5: LGTM: Imports are appropriate and well-organized.

The imports are relevant to the component's functionality, utilizing MobX for state management and importing necessary local components and hooks. The use of path aliases (@/) is a good practice for maintaining clean and consistent import statements.

web/core/components/issues/issue-modal/modal.tsx (1)

22-32: Summary: Good improvements to the issue modal component

The changes made to this file are positive:

  1. The addition of the fetchIssueDetails prop provides more flexibility in the component's behavior.
  2. The conditional rendering based on isOpen can improve performance by preventing unnecessary renders.

These changes align well with the PR objectives of making minor improvements related to the issue modal. They enhance the component's functionality and potential performance without introducing breaking changes.

web/core/components/issues/peek-overview/issue-detail.tsx (3)

3-5: LGTM: Import changes look good.

The import changes align with the component updates mentioned in the AI-generated summary. The IssueTypeSwitcher import replaces the previous IssueIdentifier component, which is consistent with the described modifications.

Also applies to: 10-11


60-60: LGTM: Component update implemented correctly.

The IssueTypeSwitcher component is correctly implemented, replacing the previous IssueIdentifier. The props are appropriately passed, with the disabled state considering both isArchived and the existing disabled prop. This change aligns well with the described modifications in the AI-generated summary.


Line range hint 1-93: Verify test and documentation updates.

The changes look good overall. However, since we've replaced IssueIdentifier with IssueTypeSwitcher, it would be prudent to ensure that:

  1. Any existing tests for this component are updated to reflect the new IssueTypeSwitcher usage.
  2. Any relevant documentation mentioning the IssueIdentifier is updated to reference IssueTypeSwitcher instead.

To help with this verification, you can run the following script:

✅ Verification successful

No test or documentation updates required.

The replacement of IssueIdentifier with IssueTypeSwitcher does not require updates to tests or documentation, as no references to IssueIdentifier were found.

🏁 Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check for potential areas that might need updates due to the component change.

# Test: Search for test files that might need updating
echo "Potential test files that might need updating:"
rg --type test "IssueIdentifier"

# Test: Search for documentation files that might need updating
echo "\nPotential documentation files that might need updating:"
rg --type md "IssueIdentifier"

Length of output: 320


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Refined search for updates needed due to the component change.

# Test: Search for test files that might need updating by common test file patterns
echo "Potential test files that might need updating:"
rg "IssueIdentifier" --glob "*.test.*" --glob "*.spec.*" --glob "__tests__/*" --glob "tests/*"

# Test: Search for documentation files that might need updating
echo "\nPotential documentation files that might need updating:"
rg "IssueIdentifier" --type md

Length of output: 502

web/core/components/issues/issue-detail/main-content.tsx (1)

21-21: LGTM: New import for IssueTypeSwitcher

The import statement for IssueTypeSwitcher is correctly added and follows the existing import style. This change aligns with the replacement of IssueIdentifier with IssueTypeSwitcher in the component's JSX.

web/app/layout.tsx (2)

96-96: Improved robustness in session recorder script insertion

This change enhances the script insertion logic by adding a conditional check. It ensures that a script tag exists in the document before attempting to insert the new script tag. This is a good defensive programming practice that prevents potential errors in cases where no script tags are present in the document.


Line range hint 1-101: Clarification needed: PR title vs. actual changes

The PR title mentions "minor improvements related to issue identifier and issue modal", but the change in this file is about improving the session recorder script insertion. Could you please clarify if there are other files in this PR that contain the changes related to the issue identifier and issue modal? Alternatively, if this change is an additional improvement, consider updating the PR title to reflect all the changes made.

To help verify the scope of changes in this PR, you can run the following script:

This script will help us understand the full scope of changes in this PR and verify if there are indeed changes related to the issue identifier and issue modal as mentioned in the PR title.

web/core/components/issues/issue-modal/base.tsx (2)

33-33: LGTM: New prop addition enhances component flexibility.

The addition of the fetchIssueDetails prop with a default value of true is a good enhancement. It provides more control over the component's behavior while maintaining backward compatibility.


72-73: LGTM: Improved conditional logic for fetching issue details.

The updated condition in the fetchIssueDetail function correctly incorporates the new fetchIssueDetails prop. This change allows for more efficient behavior by skipping the API call when not needed, while still setting the description from the data prop.

web/core/components/issues/issue-modal/form.tsx (1)

281-283: Verify if enabling issue type selection when editing an existing issue is intentional

By changing the disabled prop of the IssueTypeSelect component to only check data?.sourceIssueId, the issue type selection becomes enabled when editing an existing issue (unless sourceIssueId is present). This alteration allows users to change the issue type of an existing issue. Please verify if this behavior is intended and ensure that changing the issue type will not cause unintended side effects in the application workflow or data integrity.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants