Skip to content

Conversation

@gaalferov
Copy link
Collaborator

@gaalferov gaalferov commented Oct 20, 2025

Improve README file

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • Documentation

    • Enhanced docs with framework integration details for Symfony and Laravel
    • Added comprehensive usage examples: minimal transactional sending, sandbox vs production guidance, bulk streaming, and full-featured email construction
    • Reorganized capabilities reference into consolidated categories
  • Changelog

    • Added top-level changelog entry for version 3.9.1 noting README improvements

@coderabbitai
Copy link

coderabbitai bot commented Oct 20, 2025

Walkthrough

README.md was restructured and expanded: the "Supported functionality" block was replaced with a "Framework integration" section for Symfony and Laravel, and the Usage section was extended with minimal transactional examples, sandbox vs production guidance, bulk streaming, and a full-featured email construction example. CHANGELOG.md adds a new 3.9.1 entry noting README improvements.

Changes

Cohort / File(s) Change Summary
Documentation — README updates
README.md
Replaced "Supported functionality" with "Framework integration" (Symfony, Laravel); expanded Usage with Minimal (transactional) usage, Sandbox vs Production guidance, Bulk stream example, and a Full-featured email construction example (from, replyTo, to, templates, headers, embedding, categories, variables, exception handling); restructured capabilities list into categorized sections and adjusted code samples/escaping.
Changelog — version bump
CHANGELOG.md
Added topmost entry for version 3.9.1 (2025-10-27) with note "Improve README"; no API or functional changes.

Estimated code review effort

🎯 3 (Moderate) | ⏱️ ~20 minutes

Poem

🐇 I hopped through lines of README bright,

Guides and examples set just right,
Sandbox, bulk, and templates sing,
Bridges to frameworks now take wing,
A tiny hop — docs gleam with light. ✨

Pre-merge checks and finishing touches

❌ Failed checks (2 warnings, 1 inconclusive)
Check name Status Explanation Resolution
Description Check ⚠️ Warning The pull request description "Improve README file" is extremely minimal and does not follow the required template structure. The template specifies required sections including Motivation, Changes (with bullet points), How to test (with checkboxes), and an optional Images and GIFs section. The provided description contains none of these sections—no motivation is explained, no detailed list of changes is provided, and no testing guidance is included. This represents a largely incomplete description that fails to meet the repository's documentation standards. Please expand the pull request description to follow the template by adding: a Motivation section explaining why the README improvements were needed, a Changes section listing the specific updates (such as adding framework integration section, expanding usage examples, and reformatting supported functionality), and a How to test section with verification steps. The raw summary provides useful details that should be incorporated into the description.
Docstring Coverage ⚠️ Warning Docstring coverage is 0.00% which is insufficient. The required threshold is 80.00%. You can run @coderabbitai generate docstrings to improve docstring coverage.
Title Check ❓ Inconclusive The title "Improve README" is directly related to the changeset, as the raw summary confirms the README.md was substantially updated with new sections, examples, and restructured content. However, the title is quite generic and vague—it uses a non-descriptive term ("Improve") that could apply to almost any documentation change without conveying what specific improvements were made. A teammate scanning the history would understand that the README changed, but not whether framework integrations were added, examples were expanded, or other specific enhancements occurred.
✨ Finishing touches
🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)
  • Create PR with unit tests
  • Post copyable unit tests in a comment
  • Commit unit tests in branch feature/improve-readme

📜 Recent review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI

Review profile: CHILL

Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 143a0f4 and 15287c1.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • CHANGELOG.md (1 hunks)
✅ Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (1)
  • CHANGELOG.md

Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share

Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands and usage tips.

@yanchuk yanchuk self-requested a review October 23, 2025 09:43
Copy link
Contributor

@yanchuk yanchuk left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

The structure is fine, thanks. no new inputs. let's just separately work on functionality/examples section in #55

@gaalferov gaalferov marked this pull request as ready for review October 24, 2025 09:02
Copy link

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 0

🧹 Nitpick comments (2)
README.md (2)

76-81: Specify language for environment variables code block.

Add a language identifier to the fenced code block for better rendering and syntax highlighting:

-Example `.env` variables (or export in shell):
-```
+Example `.env` variables (or export in shell):
+```bash
 MAILTRAP_API_KEY=your_api_token # https://mailtrap.io/api-tokens

This addresses the MD040 linting hint and improves readability.


238-262: Fix unordered list indentation in Supported functionality section.

Adjust nested list items to use 2-space indentation instead of 4 spaces to align with markdown linting rules (MD007):

 ## Supported functionality
 
 Currently, with this SDK, you can:
-    - Email API/SMTP
-        - Send an email (Transactional and Bulk streams)
-        - Send an email with a Template
-        - Send a batch of emails (Transactional and Bulk streams)
-        - Sending domain management CRUD
-    - Email Sandbox
-        - Send an email
-        - Send an email with a template
-        - Send a batch of emails
-        - Message management
-        - Inbox management
-        - Project management
-    - Contact management
-        - Fields CRUD
-        - Contacts CRUD
-        - Lists CRUD
-        - Import/Export
-        - Events
-    - General
-        - Templates CRUD
-        - Suppressions management (find and delete)
-        - Billing info
+- Email API/SMTP
+  - Send an email (Transactional and Bulk streams)
+  - Send an email with a Template
+  - Send a batch of emails (Transactional and Bulk streams)
+  - Sending domain management CRUD
+- Email Sandbox
+  - Send an email
+  - Send an email with a template
+  - Send a batch of emails
+  - Message management
+  - Inbox management
+  - Project management
+- Contact management
+  - Fields CRUD
+  - Contacts CRUD
+  - Lists CRUD
+  - Import/Export
+  - Events
+- General
+  - Templates CRUD
+  - Suppressions management (find and delete)
+  - Billing info
📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI

Review profile: CHILL

Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 9fa8b36 and 143a0f4.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • README.md (5 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
🪛 markdownlint-cli2 (0.18.1)
README.md

77-77: Fenced code blocks should have a language specified

(MD040, fenced-code-language)


242-242: Unordered list indentation
Expected: 2; Actual: 4

(MD007, ul-indent)


243-243: Unordered list indentation
Expected: 2; Actual: 4

(MD007, ul-indent)


244-244: Unordered list indentation
Expected: 2; Actual: 4

(MD007, ul-indent)


245-245: Unordered list indentation
Expected: 2; Actual: 4

(MD007, ul-indent)


247-247: Unordered list indentation
Expected: 2; Actual: 4

(MD007, ul-indent)


248-248: Unordered list indentation
Expected: 2; Actual: 4

(MD007, ul-indent)


249-249: Unordered list indentation
Expected: 2; Actual: 4

(MD007, ul-indent)


250-250: Unordered list indentation
Expected: 2; Actual: 4

(MD007, ul-indent)


251-251: Unordered list indentation
Expected: 2; Actual: 4

(MD007, ul-indent)


252-252: Unordered list indentation
Expected: 2; Actual: 4

(MD007, ul-indent)


254-254: Unordered list indentation
Expected: 2; Actual: 4

(MD007, ul-indent)


255-255: Unordered list indentation
Expected: 2; Actual: 4

(MD007, ul-indent)


256-256: Unordered list indentation
Expected: 2; Actual: 4

(MD007, ul-indent)


257-257: Unordered list indentation
Expected: 2; Actual: 4

(MD007, ul-indent)


258-258: Unordered list indentation
Expected: 2; Actual: 4

(MD007, ul-indent)


260-260: Unordered list indentation
Expected: 2; Actual: 4

(MD007, ul-indent)


261-261: Unordered list indentation
Expected: 2; Actual: 4

(MD007, ul-indent)


262-262: Unordered list indentation
Expected: 2; Actual: 4

(MD007, ul-indent)

🔇 Additional comments (2)
README.md (2)

33-39: Framework integration section improves discoverability.

The new section clearly signposts bridge packages and reduces friction for framework users—good addition to the documentation.


44-229: Usage examples are well-structured and progressively informative.

The progression from minimal to full-featured examples with clear sandbox/production guidance and exception handling provides excellent documentation for different user levels.

@yanchuk yanchuk removed the request for review from SergeyKorolev October 24, 2025 12:37
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants