Skip to content

Update babel-plugin-transform-runtime to version 6.12.0 🚀#24

Merged
madhums merged 1 commit into
masterfrom
greenkeeper-babel-plugin-transform-runtime-6.12.0
Aug 1, 2016
Merged

Update babel-plugin-transform-runtime to version 6.12.0 🚀#24
madhums merged 1 commit into
masterfrom
greenkeeper-babel-plugin-transform-runtime-6.12.0

Conversation

@greenkeeperio-bot
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Hello lovely humans,

babel-plugin-transform-runtime just published its new version 6.12.0.

State Update 🚀
Dependency babel-plugin-transform-runtime
New version 6.12.0
Type devDependency

This version is not covered by your current version range.

Without accepting this pull request your project will work just like it did before. There might be a bunch of new features, fixes and perf improvements that the maintainers worked on for you though.

I recommend you look into these changes and try to get onto the latest version of babel-plugin-transform-runtime.
Given that you have a decent test suite, a passing build is a strong indicator that you can take advantage of these changes by merging the proposed change into your project. Otherwise this branch is a great starting point for you to work on the update.

Do you have any ideas how I could improve these pull requests? Did I report anything you think isn’t right?
Are you unsure about how things are supposed to work?

There is a collection of frequently asked questions and while I’m just a bot, there is a group of people who are happy to teach me new things. Let them know.

Good luck with your project ✨

You rock!

🌴


This pull request was created by greenkeeper.io.

Tired of seeing this sponsor message? ⚡ greenkeeper upgrade

@madhums madhums force-pushed the greenkeeper-babel-plugin-transform-runtime-6.12.0 branch 2 times, most recently from 003beb9 to 82fde07 Compare August 1, 2016 20:49
@madhums madhums merged commit b9400f3 into master Aug 1, 2016
@madhums madhums deleted the greenkeeper-babel-plugin-transform-runtime-6.12.0 branch August 1, 2016 20:50
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants