Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

ci: fix wrong script in llvm-build-bump-pr #70

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Nov 4, 2024
Merged

Conversation

lumirlumir
Copy link
Owner

No description provided.

@github-actions github-actions bot added the 🏷️ type: ci Auto-generated label based on Conventional Commits specification for GitHub release notes label Nov 4, 2024
Copy link

github-actions bot commented Nov 4, 2024

Labels have been automatically applied based on the conventional commit types.🏷️

@lumirlumir lumirlumir merged commit 49ceb89 into main Nov 4, 2024
35 checks passed
@lumirlumir lumirlumir deleted the ci-fix-llvm branch November 4, 2024 02:43
Copy link

codecov bot commented Nov 4, 2024

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 100.00%. Comparing base (79b49f2) to head (c4f51e3).
Report is 1 commits behind head on main.

@@            Coverage Diff            @@
##              main       #70   +/-   ##
=========================================
  Coverage   100.00%   100.00%           
=========================================
  Files            1         1           
  Lines            7         7           
=========================================
  Hits             7         7           

Continue to review full report in Codecov by Sentry.

Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact), ø = not affected, ? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update 79b49f2...c4f51e3. Read the comment docs.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
🏷️ type: ci Auto-generated label based on Conventional Commits specification for GitHub release notes
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant