We read every piece of feedback, and take your input very seriously.
To see all available qualifiers, see our documentation.
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
~ 70% cat test.ttl @prefix prov: <http://www.w3.org/ns/prov#> . <http://example.com/?a=b> a prov:Entity.
~ 71% provconvert -infile test.ttl -outfile - -outformat provn document prefix pre_1 <http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#> prefix bnode <http://openprovenance.org/provtoolbox/bnode/> prefix xsd <http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema> prefix pre_0 <http://example.com/> entity(pre_0:?a=b) endDocument
~ 72% provconvert -infile test.ttl -outfile - -outformat provn|provconvert -infile - -informat provn -outfile - -outformat ttl line 6:15 mismatched input '=' expecting ')' extensibility: qnameDisabled false b line 6:17 mismatched input ')' expecting '(' @prefix prov: <http://www.w3.org/ns/prov#> . @prefix pre_1: <http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#> . @prefix bnode: <http://openprovenance.org/provtoolbox/bnode/> . @prefix xsd: <http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#> . @prefix pre_0: <http://example.com/> . @prefix rdfs: <http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#> . ~ 73%
Should it be:
entity(pre_0:?a\=b)
Which incidentally gives:
~ 74% provconvert -infile test.provn -outfile - -outformat ttl <http://example.com/?a\\=b> a prov:Entity .
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
defined (un)escaping of PROV local names (issue #120)
9b9b92d
escaping/unescaping of PROV local names when importing/exporting RDF …
7ade75c
…URI (issue #120)
The last two commits are now addressing this issue. Would be interesting to try round trip on a whole range of URIs ....
Sorry, something went wrong.
I've been meaning to look at Fuzzing tools. Ideally you'd want something that you can give a grammar to but I'm not sure whats out there.
Issue now addressed in development branch.
No branches or pull requests
Should it be:
Which incidentally gives:
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: