Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[lldb-dap] Updated README.md for newly added attach properties. #99926

Merged
merged 55 commits into from
Jul 26, 2024

Conversation

santhoshe447
Copy link
Contributor

@santhoshe447 santhoshe447 commented Jul 22, 2024

Added "gdb-remote-port" and "gdb-remote-hostname" attach properties usage in
README.md and updated package.json version to 0.2.3

This was missed in PR #91570

Santhosh Kumar Ellendula and others added 30 commits November 17, 2023 15:09
Adding a "port" property to the VsCode "attach" command likely extends the functionality of the debugger configuratiuon to allow attaching to a process using PID or PORT number.
Currently, the "Attach" configuration lets the user specify a pid. We tell the user to use the attachCommands property to run "gdb-remote <port>".
Followed the below conditions for "attach" command with "port" and "pid"
We should add a "port" property. If port is specified and pid is not, use that port to attach. If both port and pid are specified, return an error saying that the user can't specify both pid and port.

Ex - launch.json
{
	"version": "0.2.0",
    "configurations": [
        {
            "name": "lldb-dap Debug",
            "type": "lldb-dap",
            "request": "attach",
            "port":1234,
            "program": "${workspaceFolder}/a.out",
            "args": [],
            "stopOnEntry": false,
            "cwd": "${workspaceFolder}",
            "env": [],

        }
    ]
}
Adding a "port" property to the VsCode "attach" command likely extends the functionality of the debugger configuration to allow attaching to a process using PID or PORT number.
Currently, the "Attach" configuration lets the user specify a pid. We tell the user to use the attachCommands property to run "gdb-remote ".
Followed the below conditions for "attach" command with "port" and "pid"
We should add a "port" property. If port is specified and pid is not, use that port to attach. If both port and pid are specified, return an error saying that the user can't specify both pid and port.

Ex - launch.json
{
"version": "0.2.0",
"configurations": [
{
"name": "lldb-dap Debug",
"type": "lldb-dap",
"request": "attach",
"port":1234,
"program": "${workspaceFolder}/a.out",
"args": [],
"stopOnEntry": false,
"cwd": "${workspaceFolder}",
"env": [],

    }
]
}

In this patch we have resolved code formatting issues and fixed "test_by_name" failure.
…ed review comments

Addressed all review comments.
…d all review comments.

All review comments have been addressed, and the attach-by-port tests have been verified on
Linux machine. Although the functionality is intended to support both Linux and macOS, we were
unable to verify it on macOS due to lack of access.
Santhosh Kumar Ellendula and others added 18 commits May 28, 2024 11:27
…ed review comments.

Used named pipe to read debug server listening port.
Since we are only using "gdb-remote" process plugin, changed to "gdb-remote-port" and
"gdb-remote-hostname" from "port" and "hostname"
I have shifted "Pipe" class to common location "lldb/packages/Python/lldbsuite/test/tools/lldb-server/lldbgdbserverutils.py"
Added "gdb-remote-port" and "gdb-remote-hostname" attach properties usage in
README.md.

This was missed in PR llvm#91570
@tedwoodward
Copy link

Please update the version number in package.json, so we can publish the new extension to the marketplace

Copy link
Member

@JDevlieghere JDevlieghere left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM. Can you please bump the version number in the package.json file so we can publish an update to the marketplace?

@tedwoodward tedwoodward merged commit 7345025 into llvm:main Jul 26, 2024
6 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants