[lldb] Change MemoryRegionInfo::SetIsShadowStack into a "builder" method - #189565
Merged
Conversation
Meaning a method on an object, which returns a reference to self. I am doing this because it was pointed out to me that MemoryRegionInfo has lots of construction paramaters, and most of the time, we want the default value for most of the things. So now we can do: MemoryRegionInfo(...); // Shadow stack is "don't know". MemoryRegionInfo(...).SetIsShadowStack(eNo) // Shadow stack is "no". Which removes one parameter from every use of the constructor. Along the way I realised that the shadow stack "ss" flag is only tested by the Guarded Control Stack tests, which only run on specific Arm hardware. I've added a new "ss" test to LinuxProcMapsTest, which will run on any system.
DavidSpickett
enabled auto-merge (squash)
March 31, 2026 08:49
zwu-2025
pushed a commit
to zwu-2025/llvm-project
that referenced
this pull request
May 17, 2026
…hod (llvm#189565) Meaning a method on an object, which returns a reference to self. I am doing this because it was pointed out to me that MemoryRegionInfo has lots of construction paramaters, and most of the time, we want the default value for most of the things. So now we can do: MemoryRegionInfo(...); // Shadow stack is "don't know". MemoryRegionInfo(...).SetIsShadowStack(eNo) // Shadow stack is "no". Which removes one parameter from every use of the constructor. Along the way I realised that the shadow stack "ss" flag is only tested by the Guarded Control Stack tests, which only run on specific Arm hardware. I've added a new "ss" test to LinuxProcMapsTest, which will run on any system.
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Meaning a method on an object, which returns a reference to self.
I am doing this because it was pointed out to me that MemoryRegionInfo has lots of construction paramaters, and most of the time, we want the default value for most of the things.
So now we can do:
MemoryRegionInfo(...); // Shadow stack is "don't know".
MemoryRegionInfo(...).SetIsShadowStack(eNo) // Shadow stack is "no".
Which removes one parameter from every use of the constructor.
Along the way I realised that the shadow stack "ss" flag is only tested by the Guarded Control Stack tests, which only run on specific Arm hardware. I've added a new "ss" test to LinuxProcMapsTest, which will run on any system.